RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      시적 주체의 ‘문제화’: ‘극적 독백’과 [J. 앨프리드 프루프록의 사랑 노래] = ‘Problematization’ of Poetic Subject in “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103970263

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Dramatic monologues appear in T. S. Eliot’s major poems. Eliot’s use of the dramatic monologues that are not always perfect in the Victorian poetic terms reflects his poetic or aesthetic ideals that poetry should represent a unified or immediate experience, that is, a unification of thought and feeling. Especially Eliot’s preference for the unconventional dramatic monologue forms, which contributes to the characterization of his poetic style as a modernist poetics, results in our critical debates about them. For example the critical difference in our approach to “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” between as a dramatic monologue and as an interior monologue derives from Eliot’s strategically ambiguous treatment of the forms.
      The ultimate poetic aim of Eliot’s ambiguous use of the dramatic forms lies in the ‘problematization’ of poetic subjects or lyrical selves to attack on the conventional concept of autonomous subjects. The ambiguous voices of unidentifiable poetic subjects or speakers in Eliot’s major poems reveal his modernist view of human subject, anticipating the postmodernist one. Paradoxically, the ambiguous voices of unidentifiable subjects that often appear in divided consciousness help to represent a unified experience in the poems. In short, Eliot’s use of the unconventional dramatic monologues suggests his modernist poetics which focuses on the idea of the aimlessly drifting human subjects who, nevertheless, do not give up seeking for the absolute truth or authority to refer to.
      번역하기

      Dramatic monologues appear in T. S. Eliot’s major poems. Eliot’s use of the dramatic monologues that are not always perfect in the Victorian poetic terms reflects his poetic or aesthetic ideals that poetry should represent a unified or immediate e...

      Dramatic monologues appear in T. S. Eliot’s major poems. Eliot’s use of the dramatic monologues that are not always perfect in the Victorian poetic terms reflects his poetic or aesthetic ideals that poetry should represent a unified or immediate experience, that is, a unification of thought and feeling. Especially Eliot’s preference for the unconventional dramatic monologue forms, which contributes to the characterization of his poetic style as a modernist poetics, results in our critical debates about them. For example the critical difference in our approach to “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” between as a dramatic monologue and as an interior monologue derives from Eliot’s strategically ambiguous treatment of the forms.
      The ultimate poetic aim of Eliot’s ambiguous use of the dramatic forms lies in the ‘problematization’ of poetic subjects or lyrical selves to attack on the conventional concept of autonomous subjects. The ambiguous voices of unidentifiable poetic subjects or speakers in Eliot’s major poems reveal his modernist view of human subject, anticipating the postmodernist one. Paradoxically, the ambiguous voices of unidentifiable subjects that often appear in divided consciousness help to represent a unified experience in the poems. In short, Eliot’s use of the unconventional dramatic monologues suggests his modernist poetics which focuses on the idea of the aimlessly drifting human subjects who, nevertheless, do not give up seeking for the absolute truth or authority to refer to.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Gish, "Time in the Philosophy of T A Study in Structure and Theme" Macmillan 1981

      2 London, "New Bearings in English Poetry" 1932

      3 Sinfield,Alan, "Dramatic Monologue" Methuen 1977

      4 Byron,, "Dramatic Monologue" Routledge 2003

      5 David, "Conflicts in Consciousness U of Illinois P" 1984

      6 Brooker, "Approaches to Teaching Eliot’s Poetry and Plays" 1988

      7 Smith, "A Study in Sources and Meaning U of Chicago P" 1974

      8 Southam, "A Student’s Guide to the Selected Poems of T" 1981

      9 Williamson, "A Reader’s Guide to T" 1967

      10 Langbaum,Robert, ".The Poetry of Experience:The Dramatic Monologue in Modern Literary Tradition" Norton 1973

      1 Gish, "Time in the Philosophy of T A Study in Structure and Theme" Macmillan 1981

      2 London, "New Bearings in English Poetry" 1932

      3 Sinfield,Alan, "Dramatic Monologue" Methuen 1977

      4 Byron,, "Dramatic Monologue" Routledge 2003

      5 David, "Conflicts in Consciousness U of Illinois P" 1984

      6 Brooker, "Approaches to Teaching Eliot’s Poetry and Plays" 1988

      7 Smith, "A Study in Sources and Meaning U of Chicago P" 1974

      8 Southam, "A Student’s Guide to the Selected Poems of T" 1981

      9 Williamson, "A Reader’s Guide to T" 1967

      10 Langbaum,Robert, ".The Poetry of Experience:The Dramatic Monologue in Modern Literary Tradition" Norton 1973

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼