RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Assessing Cognitive Attributes in the 8th grade Geometry

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104793871

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study identified what cognitive attributes are required of eighth graders to solve geometrical problems such as ‘Recall,’ ‘Analyze,' ‘Justify,' ‘Synthesize/Integrate,' and 'Solve Non-routine Problems' by using the cognitive diagnostic theory. The five attributes are proved as the skills for solving the geometric problems. Many students have not fully mastered the attributes of ‘Justify' and ‘Synthesize/Integrate'. There was high correlation between these attributes. ‘Analyze' best predicted the changes in the geometric achievement. And while students with high levels of geometrical achievement have mastered all the five attributes, those in the mid- and low-level range of performance have mastered fewer attributes.
    번역하기

    This study identified what cognitive attributes are required of eighth graders to solve geometrical problems such as ‘Recall,’ ‘Analyze,' ‘Justify,' ‘Synthesize/Integrate,' and 'Solve Non-routine Problems' by using the cognitive diagnostic t...

    This study identified what cognitive attributes are required of eighth graders to solve geometrical problems such as ‘Recall,’ ‘Analyze,' ‘Justify,' ‘Synthesize/Integrate,' and 'Solve Non-routine Problems' by using the cognitive diagnostic theory. The five attributes are proved as the skills for solving the geometric problems. Many students have not fully mastered the attributes of ‘Justify' and ‘Synthesize/Integrate'. There was high correlation between these attributes. ‘Analyze' best predicted the changes in the geometric achievement. And while students with high levels of geometrical achievement have mastered all the five attributes, those in the mid- and low-level range of performance have mastered fewer attributes.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김선희, "수학 평가 결과의 분석을 위한 인지 진단 이론의 활용" 대한수학교육학회 10 (10): 259-277, 2008

    2 Tatsuoka,K.K, "Toward integration of item response theory and cognitive error diagnoses. In Diagnostic monitoring of skills and knowledge acquisition" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1990

    3 Mullis, "TIMSS 2007 Assessment Frame work. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education"

    4 Tall, D, "Symbols and the Bifurcation between Procedural and Conceptual Thinking" 1 : 81-104, 2001

    5 van Hiele, "Structure and insight: a theory of mathematics education" Academic Press 1986

    6 Hartz, S, "Skills Diagnosis: Theory and Practice. User Manual for Arpeggio software"

    7 Tatsuoka,K.K, "Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory" 20 (20): 345-354, 1983

    8 Hershkowitz, R, "Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In Mathematics and cognition" Cambridge University Press 70-95, 1990

    9 NCTM, "Principles and standards for school mathematics"

    10 김수진, "Fusion Model에 의한수학 능력 진단을 위한 Q-행렬의 정교화" 한국교육평가학회 21 (21): 115-139, 2008

    1 김선희, "수학 평가 결과의 분석을 위한 인지 진단 이론의 활용" 대한수학교육학회 10 (10): 259-277, 2008

    2 Tatsuoka,K.K, "Toward integration of item response theory and cognitive error diagnoses. In Diagnostic monitoring of skills and knowledge acquisition" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1990

    3 Mullis, "TIMSS 2007 Assessment Frame work. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education"

    4 Tall, D, "Symbols and the Bifurcation between Procedural and Conceptual Thinking" 1 : 81-104, 2001

    5 van Hiele, "Structure and insight: a theory of mathematics education" Academic Press 1986

    6 Hartz, S, "Skills Diagnosis: Theory and Practice. User Manual for Arpeggio software"

    7 Tatsuoka,K.K, "Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory" 20 (20): 345-354, 1983

    8 Hershkowitz, R, "Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In Mathematics and cognition" Cambridge University Press 70-95, 1990

    9 NCTM, "Principles and standards for school mathematics"

    10 김수진, "Fusion Model에 의한수학 능력 진단을 위한 Q-행렬의 정교화" 한국교육평가학회 21 (21): 115-139, 2008

    11 Hamilton, L, "Assessment as a policy tool.Rev Res" 27 : 25-68, 2003

    12 Thissen, D, "Are Tests Comprising Both Multiple-Choice and Free-Response Items Necessarily Less Unidimensional than Multiple-Choice Tests? An Analysis of Two Tests" 31 (31): 113-123, 1994

    13 Tatsuoka,K.K, "Architecture of knowledge structure and cognitive diagnosis:A statistical pattern recognition and classification approach. In Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1995

    14 Hartz, S, "A Bayesian framework for the Unified Model for assessing cognitive abilities: blending theory with practice" The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.11 1.11 1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.01 0.99 1.315 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼