RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      진공의 압력과 시간을 달리할 때 시멘트시험편의 유효공극률 변화 = Effective Porosity Variation of Cement Samples According to Vacuum Pressure and Time

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100134078

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Effective porosity has been measured for cement specimen as a function of vacuum time and pressure in the vacuum saturation process. Six cement specimen are used; three of them are made of the same ratio of cement and sand, the other three are 100% cement mortar, of which average porosity is about 25% and 40%, respectively. Using the 6 samples, measured effective porosities are compared and examined with 5 different vacuum pressures (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 torr) and times (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 minute), respectively. Comparing measured effective porosity from experiments when vacuum time varies from 100 minute to 20 minute with 20 minute step and vacuum pressure is fixed to 10, 6, and 2 torr, average deviation decreases as 0.6, 0.5, and 0.2% respectively. Comparing measured effective porosity from experiments when vacuum pressure varies from 2 torr to 10 torr with 2 torr step and vacuum time is fixed to 100, 60, and 20 minute, average deviation increases as vacuum time decreases. These results can be a background of suggested method of ISRM that describes the vacuum time longer than 60 minute and vacuum pressure higher than 6 torr. In this study, only qualitative discussion can be possible for the effects on the effective porosity by decreasing 20 minute vacuuming time at the same pressure or by decreasing 2 torr of vacuum pressure at the same vacuum time. This is because the sample could not reached to perfectly dried condition even though the sample were dried at 105oC and following the ISRM suggested method, so that initial water content could not be the same at each experiment.
      번역하기

      Effective porosity has been measured for cement specimen as a function of vacuum time and pressure in the vacuum saturation process. Six cement specimen are used; three of them are made of the same ratio of cement and sand, the other three are 100% ce...

      Effective porosity has been measured for cement specimen as a function of vacuum time and pressure in the vacuum saturation process. Six cement specimen are used; three of them are made of the same ratio of cement and sand, the other three are 100% cement mortar, of which average porosity is about 25% and 40%, respectively. Using the 6 samples, measured effective porosities are compared and examined with 5 different vacuum pressures (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 torr) and times (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 minute), respectively. Comparing measured effective porosity from experiments when vacuum time varies from 100 minute to 20 minute with 20 minute step and vacuum pressure is fixed to 10, 6, and 2 torr, average deviation decreases as 0.6, 0.5, and 0.2% respectively. Comparing measured effective porosity from experiments when vacuum pressure varies from 2 torr to 10 torr with 2 torr step and vacuum time is fixed to 100, 60, and 20 minute, average deviation increases as vacuum time decreases. These results can be a background of suggested method of ISRM that describes the vacuum time longer than 60 minute and vacuum pressure higher than 6 torr. In this study, only qualitative discussion can be possible for the effects on the effective porosity by decreasing 20 minute vacuuming time at the same pressure or by decreasing 2 torr of vacuum pressure at the same vacuum time. This is because the sample could not reached to perfectly dried condition even though the sample were dried at 105oC and following the ISRM suggested method, so that initial water content could not be the same at each experiment.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이상규, "진공 압력과 시간을 달리할 때시멘트시험편의 유효공극률 변화" 203-206, 2012

      2 한국암반공학회, "암석의 공극률 및 밀도 측정 표준시험법" 16 (16): 95-98, 2006

      3 이상규, "습식진공과 건식진공에 의한 시험편의 유효공극률 비교" 195-197, 2012

      4 이상규, "수분분리기 및 이를 포함하는 수분 포획장치"

      5 이상규, "건조과정에서 무게 모니터링을 통한 암석 시험편의 고체무게 산출 방법" 한국자원공학회 47 (47): 183-190, 2010

      6 ISRM, "Suggested methods for determining water content, porosity, density, absorption and related properties and swelling and slake-durability index properties" 1979

      1 이상규, "진공 압력과 시간을 달리할 때시멘트시험편의 유효공극률 변화" 203-206, 2012

      2 한국암반공학회, "암석의 공극률 및 밀도 측정 표준시험법" 16 (16): 95-98, 2006

      3 이상규, "습식진공과 건식진공에 의한 시험편의 유효공극률 비교" 195-197, 2012

      4 이상규, "수분분리기 및 이를 포함하는 수분 포획장치"

      5 이상규, "건조과정에서 무게 모니터링을 통한 암석 시험편의 고체무게 산출 방법" 한국자원공학회 47 (47): 183-190, 2010

      6 ISRM, "Suggested methods for determining water content, porosity, density, absorption and related properties and swelling and slake-durability index properties" 1979

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 물리탐사 -> 지구물리와 물리탐사
      외국어명 : Geophysical Exploration -> Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration
      KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.15 0.15 0.15
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.14 0.15 0.311 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼