정의의 아포리아(aporia)와형의 유예제도에 대한 법문학적 이해-카뮈의 <손님>을 예로 하여 = Understanding the Aporias of Justice and Suspension of Penalty in View of Law and Literature. -in Camus` “The Guest”

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper covers the interaction among philosophy, literature and law. Justice, as illustrated by Derrida, is produced by deconstructing the law. This particular justice has three aporias: epokhe of the rule, the ghost of the undecidable, the urgency that obstructs the horizon of knowledge.These three aporias of justice are distinct when applied to the decision situations of Camus` “The Guest” characters. Decision situations and form in decision making process of a judge in trial can be analogized to the decision situation and form of each character(Balducci, Daru, the Arab). Both the decision making judge and each decision making character encounter aporias of justice. However the judge who decides thorough trial in real world cannot resolve aporias of justice by approaching it theoretically but only by approaching it practically.Suspension of penalty is one typical representation of the existent practical resolution of the current legal system. By suspending, the judge in the middle of each character`s situation can make a decision while placed inbetween two opposite notions; between ‘universality of law and distinctiveness of specific situation’ (as of the first aporia), between ‘decision for justice and undecidability of justice’(as of the second aporia), and between ‘resignation for disjustice and hope for justice’(as of the last aporia). The law-philosophical and law-literary meanings inherent in suspension of penalty let us have more practical understanding of Derrida`s aporias of justice.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상돈, "형사소송에서 논증의무조절과 이성적 법정책-공판조서와 판결서작성의 편의주의적 간소화에 대한 비판" 9 : 1994

2 정채연, "유럽사회에서 다문화정책의 현황과 관용의 한계 －프랑스의 라이시떼와 독일의 민주적 헌정주의를 중심으로－" 법학연구소 36 (36): 325-371, 2012

3 J. Derrida, "에코그라피: 텔레비전에 관하여 Echographies de la television: entretiens filmes" 민음사 2002

4 Albert Camus, "알베르 카뮈 전집" 책세상 2010

5 이상돈, "안락사의 절차적 정당화-안락사의 실체와 법적 대응-" 18 : 1999

6 윤원준, "신의 음성과 책임: 레비나스와 데리다의 생각 속의 키에르케고르적 윤리" 한국조직신학회 (28) : 149-176, 2010

7 이상돈, "법이론" 박영사 1997

8 J. Derrida, "법의 힘 Force de loi" 문학과 지성사 2004

9 이상돈, "법문학이란 무엇인가? -법문학을 통한 법적 정의의 실현가능성에 대한 시론-" 법학연구원 (48) : 59-82, 2007

10 이상돈, "법문학비평의 개념, 방법, 이론, 실천" 안암법학회 통 (통): 389-426, 2007

11 이소영, "법문학" 新英社 2005

12 Edward W. Said, "문화와 제국주의" 도서출판 창 2011

13 문광훈, "무한한 정의 - 발터 벤야민과 자크 데리다의 법 이해 -" 한국독일언어문학회 (51) : 109-127, 2011

14 J. Derrida, "마르크스의 유령들 Spectres de Marx" 이제이북스 2007

15 이은정, "데리다의 시적 환대 －환대의 생성적 아포리아－" 인문학연구원 (44) : 91-121, 2009

16 이상돈, "기초법학" 법문사 2010

17 Drucilla Cornell, "Working through Derrida" Northwestern University Press Evanston 1993

18 Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, "The Suspension of Suspension: SETTLING FOR THE IMPROBABLE" University of California Press 15 (15): 2003

19 Edwin P. Grobe, "The Psychological Structure of Camus’s “L’Hôte”" 40 (40): 1966

20 Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, "Spatial justice: law and the geography of withdrawal" Cambridge University Press 6 (6): 2010

21 Jungah Kim, "Rooted and Rootless, Exiled and Belonging: Aporetic Moments of Justice as Law in Camus’s “The Guest”" University of California Press 25 (25): 2013

22 Jacques Derrida, "Margins of Philosophy" The University of Chicago Press 1982

23 Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, "Law’s Spatial Turn: Geography, Justice and a Certain Fear of Space" 7 (7): 2011

24 Klaus Günther, "Der Sinn für Angemessenheit" Ffm 1987

25 John D. Caputo, "Deconstruction in a nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida" Fordham University Press 1997