中国环境公益诉讼的发展 — 以设立环保法庭的地区为中心

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In order to settle the problem of regional restriction occurred when carry out the environmental protection by administrative means，some heavily polluted areas in China revolutionarily established the environmental protection court and issued related regulations，so as to protect the environment through carrying forward the environmental public interest litigation. Compared with the Administrative Environmental Public Interest Litigation，the Chinese government is more inclined to carry forward the Civil Environmental Public Interest Litigation. But the biggest problem which haunts the environmental protection court is few people resort to the court for such a complaint. The social system as well as cultural tradition underlying this phenomenon is deep and profound. First，the environmental deterioration reflects only one side of the entire social status quo of China， and it is caused by the state-led model of development lacking of the necessary democratic supervision. The essence of the environmental public interest litigation should be that democracy supervises state to carry out its governing role on social affairs. It is necessary to foster a democratic culture when sets about to establish the public interest litigation，and it can’t be accomplished in one day. Given the democracy is absent，it is worrisome of the prospect that how long the environmental public interest litigation which is dominated by state or local government will last and whether it could be successful in the end. Second, the court is not independent in China in which separation of powers hasn’t be adopted, and currently it is positioned to a large extent only to assist the government to solve social problems as it did before. Such position and situation will undoubtedly create a court as weak as not be able to shoulder the responsibility of environmental public interest litigation of which it has the function to form environmental policie s，even there is the righteous brave enough to file a suit against the government to the court on behalf of public interest. Third, when an administrative environmental public interest litigation is to be lodged，the litigation is reasonable only when the state environmental protection authority can do something but actually it did not. The state environmental protection authority should be granted sufficient enforcement power before filing an administrative environmental public interest litigation. To push forward the environmental public interest litigation，in addition to the above profound problems to be solved, it has to loose the standard of establishing environmental protection group，improve the management system of such group，enhance the governmental information disclosure，and perfect the identification system. Considering all the reasons above，it will take a long time for China to develop environmental public interest litigation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序言
• Ⅱ. 环境公益诉讼的含义及其必要性
• Ⅲ. 中国推进环境公益诉讼的尝试
• Ⅳ. 中国环境公益诉讼存在的问题分析及对策
• Ⅴ. 小结
• 参考文献
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 张卫平, "起诉难：一个中国问题的思索" 6 : 65-, 2009

2 "贵州省首例检察机关当原告提起环境民事公益诉讼案开庭"

3 李云超, "贵州环境公益诉讼第一案宣判天峰化工公司被判停止侵害" 2008

4 周之江, "贵州依法审理第一起跨行政区域环境公益诉讼案"

5 赵星, "试论我国环境污损司法鉴定机构的建构——以完善环境犯罪的惩治为视角"

6 赵杰, "论社会司法鉴定机构的公益属性" 6 : 48-, 2007

7 孙飞, "论环境污染司法鉴定机构的设置" 2008

8 叶勇飞, "论环境民事公益诉讼" 5 : 2004

9 安然, "论我国环境污损司法鉴定机构的革新与完善" 2010

10 安然, "论我国环境污损司法鉴定机构的革新与完善" 2010

11 郭华, "论我国司法鉴定管理制度的方向与跟进" 8 : 2005

12 赖薇, "论NGO在环境行政公益诉讼中的法律地位" 中国政法大学 2006

13 黄学贤, "行政公益诉讼研究" 中国政法大学出版社 2008

14 "自然之友就铬渣污染事件向云南曲靖中院提起公益诉讼"

15 吴玉章, "社会团体的法律问题" 社会科学文献出版社 54-, 2004

16 "环境公益诉讼：困局何因，当事者说"

17 万鄂湘, "环境公益诉讼已逼到门下谁能代表污染受害者"

18 高洁, "环境公益诉讼与环保法庭的生命力——中国环保法庭的发展与未来"

19 别涛, "环境公益诉讼" 法律出版社 2007

20 吕忠梅, "环境公益实现之诉讼制度构想, In 环境公益诉讼" 法律出版社 23-, 2007

21 网络报道, "潘岳：修修补补解决不了环境问题：须完善法律"

22 "海南高院破解环境公益诉讼两大困局拟设环保公益资金赋予部分环保公益组织主体资格"

23 林莉红, "法社会学视野下的中国公益诉讼" 1 : 2008

24 "民事诉讼法修正案（草案）条文及草案说明"

25 李云龙, "民主、自由、人权、正义——一个社会主义者的解读" 河南人民出版社 2002

26 齐树洁, "接近“环境正义”：域外经验与我国实践" 秋季 : 2009

27 "抡起大棒打蚊子——云南环境公益诉讼第一案出台内情"

28 郄建荣, "打击环境犯罪， 司法为何使不上劲"

29 曹东海, "怒江保卫战幕后的民间力量"

30 吴琼, "对我国环保非政府组织的法学分析" 华东政法学院法学 2004

31 "地方环保局长的心声：不是不作为而是无法作为"

32 方道茂, "司法鉴定结论科学性的采信标准" 6 : 94-96, 2006

33 陶国中, "司法鉴定机构生存和发展环境问题的研究与思考" 3 : 2011

34 陶国中, "司法鉴定机构生存和发展环境问题的研究与思考" 3 : 2011

35 颜运秋, "公益诉讼理念研究" 中国检察出版社 2002

36 "全国首例社团组织环境行政公益诉讼案贵阳开审"

37 "全国首例环境民事公益诉讼以调解结案"

38 "云南环境保护法庭全国最多"

39 "中国绿色国民经济核算研究报告2004" 2004

40 别涛, "中国的环境公益诉讼及其立法设想, In 环境公益诉讼," 法律出版社 2-, 2007

41 国家环境保护总局, "中国环境统计年报（2006年）" 中国环境科学出版社 2007

42 孔金萍, "中国环境公益诉讼的必要性" 한중법학회 16 : 205-226, 2011

43 王社坤, "中国环保法庭的现状与问题" 学会材料 78-,

44 郭少峰, "两院士上书建议开发怒江水电站"

45 常林, "专家学者聚首京城纪念《决定》实施5周年"

46 "http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2007-12/27/content_7325592.htm"

47 胥晓莺, "NGO‘怒江保卫战’逆转？"

48 The World Bank, "Cost of Pollution in China: Economic Estimates of Physical Damages" The Word Bank 2007