RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    인공지능 윤리에서의 차별 방지 = Non-discrimination in Artificial Intelligence Ethics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107275561

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The need for non-discrimination in artificial intelligence was not much noticed in the early stages of artificial intelligence development, but it emerged as an important issue as early artificial intelligence based on biased data produced discriminative results. Although there is a mixture of anti-discrimination and engagement policies, non-discrimination is considered a very important issue in the recently announced artificial intelligence ethics compared to the early artificial intelligence ethics.
    Remarkably, European Union forms a regulatory framework that leads to the “Artificial Intelligence White Paper”, “Artificial Intelligence Ethics Guidelines”, and “Assessment List” regarding artificial intelligence ethics.
    In Korea, legal norms, ethical guidelines, and assessments related to artificial intelligence ethics need to form a framework for new disciplines that are organically connected. Unfortunately, there is no law in Korea that states the principle of non-discrimination in relation to artificial intelligence, but the "Basic Law on Intelligence Informatization" can be considered as the closest law. First of all, legal regulations that declare basic principles related to artificial intelligence will be needed. In conjunction with this, we can think of ways to create ethical guidelines for the prevention of discrimination in artificial intelligence systems and to create assessment criteria in stages to define specific requirements.
    번역하기

    The need for non-discrimination in artificial intelligence was not much noticed in the early stages of artificial intelligence development, but it emerged as an important issue as early artificial intelligence based on biased data produced discriminat...

    The need for non-discrimination in artificial intelligence was not much noticed in the early stages of artificial intelligence development, but it emerged as an important issue as early artificial intelligence based on biased data produced discriminative results. Although there is a mixture of anti-discrimination and engagement policies, non-discrimination is considered a very important issue in the recently announced artificial intelligence ethics compared to the early artificial intelligence ethics.
    Remarkably, European Union forms a regulatory framework that leads to the “Artificial Intelligence White Paper”, “Artificial Intelligence Ethics Guidelines”, and “Assessment List” regarding artificial intelligence ethics.
    In Korea, legal norms, ethical guidelines, and assessments related to artificial intelligence ethics need to form a framework for new disciplines that are organically connected. Unfortunately, there is no law in Korea that states the principle of non-discrimination in relation to artificial intelligence, but the "Basic Law on Intelligence Informatization" can be considered as the closest law. First of all, legal regulations that declare basic principles related to artificial intelligence will be needed. In conjunction with this, we can think of ways to create ethical guidelines for the prevention of discrimination in artificial intelligence systems and to create assessment criteria in stages to define specific requirements.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 오태원, "초연결사회의 미래규범" 한국인터넷윤리학회 1 (1): 7-21, 2017

    2 한애라, "인공지능과 젠더차별" 젠더법학연구소 11 (11): 1-39, 2019

    3 임경석, "바람직한 디지털 공동체와 시민성을 위한 윤리(규범) 선언 - 철학적 단상 -" 한국인터넷윤리학회 3 (3): 43-48, 2019

    4 EU Commission, "White Paper on Artificial Intelligence"

    5 EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, "Trustworthy AI Assessment List"

    6 UNESCO, "First Version of a draft text of a Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence"

    7 EU Commission, "Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI"

    8 오태원, "EU의 인공지능 백서와 인공지능 윤리 구현 정책" 한국인터넷윤리학회 4 (4): 22-31, 2020

    9 EU Commission, "Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence"

    10 EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, "Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) for self-assessment"

    1 오태원, "초연결사회의 미래규범" 한국인터넷윤리학회 1 (1): 7-21, 2017

    2 한애라, "인공지능과 젠더차별" 젠더법학연구소 11 (11): 1-39, 2019

    3 임경석, "바람직한 디지털 공동체와 시민성을 위한 윤리(규범) 선언 - 철학적 단상 -" 한국인터넷윤리학회 3 (3): 43-48, 2019

    4 EU Commission, "White Paper on Artificial Intelligence"

    5 EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, "Trustworthy AI Assessment List"

    6 UNESCO, "First Version of a draft text of a Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence"

    7 EU Commission, "Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI"

    8 오태원, "EU의 인공지능 백서와 인공지능 윤리 구현 정책" 한국인터넷윤리학회 4 (4): 22-31, 2020

    9 EU Commission, "Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence"

    10 EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, "Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) for self-assessment"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
    2022-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼