군자적 리더십의 타당도에 관한 연구 = A Validation Study of Kunja's Leadership

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to validate the concept of Kunja’s leadership. In study 1, we investigated discriminant and convergent validity of Kunja's leadership by comparing it with transformational leadership and authentic leadership on the basis of 494 full-time workers' data. The result supported our argument that Kunja's leadership would be different from transformational leadership and authentic leadership. In study 2, we tested the subscale's effectiveness of Kunja's leadership with 90 team level data gained from 18 Korean business organizations. The results of regression analysis supported research hypotheses: Each subscale of Kunja's leadership would positively affect subordinates' trust in their leaders after holding for transformational leadership and authentic leadership respectively. The implications of these results would be discussed in the conclusion.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 군자적 리더십의 타당도 검증을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 연구 1은 군자적 리더십의 구성타당도를 확인하기 위한 것으로서 494명의 직장인들에게서 얻은 데이터를 활용하여 군자적 리더십과 변혁적 및 진실의 리더십의 구성개념들과의 관계성을 분석하였다. 두 리더십 변인들과 군자적 리더십의 구성개념들간의 높은 상관관계로 인해 발생할 수 있는 다중공선성의 문제를 피하기 위해 단계적 회귀분석(stepwise regression)을 수행하였다. 분석결과 신(信)이 변혁 및 진실의 리더십과 공통적으로 높은 상관관계가 있고, 비록 인(仁)과 지(智)의 요소가 변혁 및 진실의 리더십을 설명하는 요소로 포함되기는 하나 설명되는 부분이 약하며, 의(義)와 예(禮)는 변혁 및 진실의 리더십에 포함되지 않고 있는 군자적 리더십의 독특성을 내포하고 있음을 발견하였다. 그리고 세 리더십에 관한 확인적 요인분석 결과를 통해 군자적 리더십이 변혁적 리더십 및 진실의 리더십과 판별되는 개념임을 확인하였다. 연구 2는 군자적 리더십의 준거관련타당도를 확인하기 위한 것으로서 18개 기업의 90개 팀으로부터 얻은 자료를 활용하여 군자적 리더십의 구성개념들이 리더에 대한 신뢰에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 위계적 회귀분석 결과, 군자적 리더십의 구성개념들인 인의예지신이 각각 리더에 대한 신뢰에 정적인 영향을 미치고 있으며, 오상의 요인들을 회귀식에 모두 포함하여 상대적 기여도를 확인한 결과 인(仁)과 신(信)이 리더에 대한 신뢰에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 결정적인 하위구성개념임을 발견하였다. 본 연구의 결과와 시사점에 관해서 결론부분에서 자세히 논의하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 류수영, "한국인의 유교적 가치측정문항개발 연구" 한국인사·조직학회 15 (15): 171-205, 2007

2 전택수, "한국인의 경제적 성격과 한국경제학 연구방법론" 한국학중앙연구원 26 (26): 25-66, 2003

3 신유근, "한국기업 최고경영자의 행동특성과 리더십 스타일" 4 (4): 203-233, 1996

4 전택수, "한국경제 발전과정에서 보인 전통문화의 역할" 46 (46): 95-122, 1998

5 이경묵, "사서에 나타난 리더십" 1 : 83-140, 2004

6 류수영, "군자적 리더십의 개념․측정․효과성에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 2009

7 류수영, "군자적 리더십의 개념 및 측정도구 개발연구" 한국심리학회 28 (28): 209-237, 2009

8 Lewicki, R. J., "Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. in: Conflict, cooperation, and justice" Jossey-Bass 133-173, 1995

9 Dirks, K. T., "Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice" 87 (87): 611-628, 2002

10 Deutsch, M., "Trust and suspicion" 2 : 265-279, 1958

11 Zand, D. E., "Trust and managerial problem solving" 17 : 229-239, 1972

12 Butler, J. K., Jr., "Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory" 17 (17): 643-663, 1991

13 Lord, R. G, "Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research" 11 (11): 551-579, 2000

14 Conger, J. A., "Theoretical foundations of charismatic leadership. in: Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness" Jossey‐Bass. 1988

15 McClelland, D. C., "The two faces of power" 24 (24): 29-47, 1970

16 Weber, M., "The theory of social and economic organization (T. Parsons, Trans.)" Free Press 1947

17 Goffman, E, "The presentation of self in everyday life" Doubleday & Company, Inc 1959

18 Erickson, R. J., "The importance of authenticity for self and society" 18 (18): 121-144, 1995

19 MacKenzie, S. B., "The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of sales performance" 57 : 123-150, 1993

20 French, J. R. P., "The bases of social power. in: Studies in social power" University of Michigan Press 150-167, 1959

21 Boseman, G., "The Australian multinational: Parent and subsidiary relationships" 26 : 43-51, 1986

22 Kerr, S., "Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement" 22 : 375-403, 1978

23 Lewis, J. D., "Social atomism, holism, and trust" 26 : 455-471, 1985

24 Podsakoff, P. M., "Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction?" 34 : 21-63, 1984

25 Conger, J. A., "Perceived behavioral attributes of charismatic leadership" 24 (24): 86-102, 1992

26 Klein, K. J., "Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. in: Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions" Jossey‐Bass 2000

27 Cropanzano, R., "Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice" 58 : 164-209, 2001

28 Conger, J. A., "Measuring charisma: Dimensionality and validity of the Conger- Kanungo scale of charismatic leadership" 14 (14): 290-302, 1997

29 Whitener, E. M., "Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior" 23 (23): 513-530, 1998

30 Bass, B. M., "Management styles associated with organizational, task, personal, and interpersonal contingencies" 60 (60): 720-729, 1975

31 Lord, R. G., "Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts" 12 : 133-152, 2001

32 Dorfman, P. W., "Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures" 8 (8): 233-274, 1997

33 Bass, B. M., "Leadership and performance beyond expectations" Free Press 1985

34 Burns, J. M., "Leadership" Harper & Row 1978

35 Honnon, J. M., "International resource strategy and its determinants: The case of subsidiaries in Taiwan" 26 : 531-554, 1995

36 Shin, Y., "Individualism and collectivism in Korean industry. in: Psychology of the Korean people" Dong-A Publishing 189-208, 1994

37 Blau, P. M., "Exchange and power in social life" Wiley 1964

38 Bass, B. M., "Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior" 10 (10): 181-217, 1999

39 James, L. R., "Estimating within‐group interrater reliability with and without response bias" 69 (69): 85-98, 1984

40 House, R. J., "Culture, Leadership, and Organizations" Sage Publications 2004

41 Lord, R. G., "Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions" 12 (12): 311-338, 2001

42 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

43 Conger, J. A., "Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement" 15 : 439-452, 1994

44 Conger, J. A., "Charismatic leadership in organizations" Sage Publications 1998

45 Gardner, W. L., "Can you see the real me? A self‐based model of authentic leader and follower development" 16 : 343-372, 2005

46 Harter, J. K., "Authenticity. in: Handbook of positive psychology" Oxford University Press 382-394, 2002

47 Walumbwa, F. O., "Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure" 34 (34): 89-126, 2008

48 Avolio, B. J., "Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership" 16 : 315-338, 2005

49 Sparrowe, R. T, "Authentic leadership and the narrative self" 16 : 419-439, 2005

50 Ilies, R., "Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes" 16 : 373-394, 2005

51 Podsakoff, P. M., "An examination of the psychometric properties and nomological validity of some revised and reduced substitutes for leadership scales" 79 (79): 702-713, 1994

52 McAllister, D. J., "Affect- and cognition -based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations" 38 : 24-59, 1995

53 Dansereau, F., Jr., "A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process" 13 : 46-78, 1975

54 Lord, R. G., "A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions" 34 : 343-378, 1984

55 Bhattacharya, R., "A formal model of trust based on outcomes" 23 (23): 459-472, 1998