RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      自白排際의 法理  :  The Exclusion of Anti-Due process of Law = CONFESSION IN THE LEGAL PRINCIPLES

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30002374

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Confession in judicial procedures is highly regarded, and for this reason many and various ways are employed in order to obtain it, some methods unfortunately infringing on human rights.
      There are certain problems involved in how to set the law in regards to the infringement of this right.
      There is currently a debate on the interpretation of the Legal Principles. This has gone through a process of change in the United States, the original source of this law.
      It is time to accept this progressive change as it is evident in the United States in the case of Confession in McNabb and Mellory. The Confession should be in accordance with the due process of law with accompanying evidence without regards of the Voluntary Confession as contained the Constitution Article 10 F, and Article 309 in the Code of the Criminal Procedures.
      번역하기

      The Confession in judicial procedures is highly regarded, and for this reason many and various ways are employed in order to obtain it, some methods unfortunately infringing on human rights. There are certain problems involved in how to set the law i...

      The Confession in judicial procedures is highly regarded, and for this reason many and various ways are employed in order to obtain it, some methods unfortunately infringing on human rights.
      There are certain problems involved in how to set the law in regards to the infringement of this right.
      There is currently a debate on the interpretation of the Legal Principles. This has gone through a process of change in the United States, the original source of this law.
      It is time to accept this progressive change as it is evident in the United States in the case of Confession in McNabb and Mellory. The Confession should be in accordance with the due process of law with accompanying evidence without regards of the Voluntary Confession as contained the Constitution Article 10 F, and Article 309 in the Code of the Criminal Procedures.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 一. 序
      • 二. 自由排除法理의 變遷 - 美國을 中心으로 -
      • 三. 自由排除에 關한 見解와 批判
      • 四. 憲法 第10條6項 및 刑訴法 第309 條 檢討
      • 1. 法理
      • 一. 序
      • 二. 自由排除法理의 變遷 - 美國을 中心으로 -
      • 三. 自由排除에 關한 見解와 批判
      • 四. 憲法 第10條6項 및 刑訴法 第309 條 檢討
      • 1. 法理
      • 2. 分析, 檢討
      • 五. 結語
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼