RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      의식에 대한 1인칭과 3인칭 접근법의 융합 가능성 = On the Possibility of Convergence in the First-Person and Third-Person Approaches to Consciousness

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108117217

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Normally consciousness indicates waking, attentive mental states. In order to pin down the nature of consciousness, there have been two distinct methods. In the context of contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive science, those two are respectively called “the first-person method” and “the third-person method.” According to Francisco Varela, phenomenological descriptive method represents the former, whereas brain science or neuroscience stands for the latter. It is noticeable that some scholars have recently proposed that those two approaches, in order for them to become a more proper study of consciousness, need to be somehow integrated. In this regard Varela puts forward the idea that the first-person and the third-person methods in consciousness studies should be combined or converged, in a way that can fulfill the condition of mutual constraints between the two methods. We can acknowledge and accept Varela’s view. But Varela’s specific claim that the way in which those two methods are integrated should be “mutual constraints” or “mutual determination” is so strong that it seems to be, rather, implausible. Concerning this matter, the author of the paper argues that the way in which convergence between the first-person and the third-person approaches to consciousness is made, particularly considering the current aspects of the developments of philosophy and sciences, should be “mutual dialogue” or “mutual growth.”
      번역하기

      Normally consciousness indicates waking, attentive mental states. In order to pin down the nature of consciousness, there have been two distinct methods. In the context of contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive science, those two are respective...

      Normally consciousness indicates waking, attentive mental states. In order to pin down the nature of consciousness, there have been two distinct methods. In the context of contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive science, those two are respectively called “the first-person method” and “the third-person method.” According to Francisco Varela, phenomenological descriptive method represents the former, whereas brain science or neuroscience stands for the latter. It is noticeable that some scholars have recently proposed that those two approaches, in order for them to become a more proper study of consciousness, need to be somehow integrated. In this regard Varela puts forward the idea that the first-person and the third-person methods in consciousness studies should be combined or converged, in a way that can fulfill the condition of mutual constraints between the two methods. We can acknowledge and accept Varela’s view. But Varela’s specific claim that the way in which those two methods are integrated should be “mutual constraints” or “mutual determination” is so strong that it seems to be, rather, implausible. Concerning this matter, the author of the paper argues that the way in which convergence between the first-person and the third-person approaches to consciousness is made, particularly considering the current aspects of the developments of philosophy and sciences, should be “mutual dialogue” or “mutual growth.”

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김영진, "현대 인지과학과 고전적 현상학 -그 간극 메우기에 관한 고찰-" 동서사상연구소 (27) : 1-22, 2018

      2 크리스토프 코흐, "의식" 알마 출판사 2014

      3 김영진, "데넷의 헤테로 현상학: 그 원리상의 난점과 의의에 관한 시론" 한국현상학회 (77) : 25-50, 2018

      4 스타니슬라스 데하네, "뇌의식의 탄생" 한언 2017

      5 Ludlow, P., "There's Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument" MIT Press 2004

      6 Searle, J. R., "The Rediscovery of the Mind" MIT Press 1992

      7 Stoljar, D., "The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia" Routledge 158-163, 2006

      8 Armstrong, D. M., "The Mind-Body Problem: An Opinionated Introduction" Westview Press 1999

      9 Ryle, G., "The Concept of Mind" Barns and Noble, Inc 1949

      10 Van Manen, M., "Researching Lived Experience" State University of New York Press 2003

      1 김영진, "현대 인지과학과 고전적 현상학 -그 간극 메우기에 관한 고찰-" 동서사상연구소 (27) : 1-22, 2018

      2 크리스토프 코흐, "의식" 알마 출판사 2014

      3 김영진, "데넷의 헤테로 현상학: 그 원리상의 난점과 의의에 관한 시론" 한국현상학회 (77) : 25-50, 2018

      4 스타니슬라스 데하네, "뇌의식의 탄생" 한언 2017

      5 Ludlow, P., "There's Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument" MIT Press 2004

      6 Searle, J. R., "The Rediscovery of the Mind" MIT Press 1992

      7 Stoljar, D., "The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia" Routledge 158-163, 2006

      8 Armstrong, D. M., "The Mind-Body Problem: An Opinionated Introduction" Westview Press 1999

      9 Ryle, G., "The Concept of Mind" Barns and Noble, Inc 1949

      10 Van Manen, M., "Researching Lived Experience" State University of New York Press 2003

      11 Bennett, M. R., "Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience" Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2003

      12 Noë, A., "Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness" Hill and Wang 2009

      13 김영진, "On the Methodological Constraints that a Theory of Phenomenal Consciousness Ought to Adopt" 한국현상학회 (52) : 1-23, 2012

      14 Churchland, P. S., "Neurophilosophy" MIT Press 1986

      15 Varela, F. J., "Neurophenomenology" 3 : 330349-, 1996

      16 Searle, J. R., "Mind, Language, and Society" Brockman, Inc 1998

      17 Smith, J., "Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis" Sage Publications Ltd 2009

      18 Varela, F. J., "First-person Methodologies : What, Why, How?" 6 : 1-14, 1999

      19 Geogalis, N., "First-Person Methodologies : A View from Outside the Phenomenological Tradition" XLV : 93-112, 2007

      20 Chalmers, D., "Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness" 2 : 200-219, 1995

      21 Churchland, P. S., "Can Neurobiology Teach Us Anything about Consciousness?" 67 (67): 23-40, 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.3
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.23 0.863 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼