이명박 정부 교육정책에 대한 지젝의 “세 계론(three orders theory)”에 의거한 분석 = An Analysis on Lee Myung Park Government`s Educational Policies with Zizek`s Three Order Theory

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A purpose of this study is to analyze latent purposes of Lee Myung Park Government`s educational policy. A measure which be used on the research is Zizek`s ``Three Order Theory``. ``The Three Order Theory`` refers to fields of three versions that psychological functions effect living of person. ``The Imaginary Order``, first stage of ``The Three Order Theory`` refers to field that a confirming to ``the other person`` gives effects to living, ``The Symbolic Order`` refers to field which a confirming to authority and rules gives effects to living, and ``The Real Order`` refers to field which a committment to natural needs and drives gives effects to living. And something in ``The Imaginary Order`` disguise true beings in the ``The Real Order``, because that public appearance of anything in the ``The Real Order`` make the self be dreadful. According to ``The three Order``, the Lee Government`s ``Improvement of Educational Competitive Power`` and ``Building of Advanced Nation`` are educational policies in terms of ``The Imaginary Order``, because of the ``Improvement of Educational Competitive Power`` and ``Building of Advanced Nation`` refer to conforming to the educational system of the advanced nations as ``the Other``. the ``Building of Society that firmly estimates Laws and Principles`` of the Lee Government are educational policies in terms of ``The Symbolic Order``, because that the ``Building of Society that estimates Laws and Principles`` refers to retrieving and keeping a strong public authority and enforcement through a schooling. Although without the appearanced statements, the true intents of the educational policy as latent one in terms of ``The Real Order`` are ``reproduction of academic background and wealth for themselves as upper class people``. Although Lee Myung Park Government really wants to establish the educational policies for the reproduction of ``what they have``, and fulfill them, they dose not dare to make an acting it out because of resistance of people who hate an unequality. So they suggest the ``Improvement of Educational Competitive Power`` and ``Building of Advanced Nation`` as a fantasy in order to cunningly disguise their real intention.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이현우, "흐름_국내 학술출판계의 아이콘 ‘지젝’"

2 제7대 대통령직 인수위원회, "제7대 대통령직 인수위원회 백서 :성공 그리고 나눔"

3 이택광, "인문좌파를 위한 가이드" 글항아리 2010

4 김현강, "슬라보예 지젝" 이룸

5 목영해, "바람 든 한국교육" 문음사 2009

6 Myers,Tony, "누가 슬라보예 지젝을 미워하는가" 엘피 2005

7 한국교육과정평가원, "국제학업성취도평가에 나타난 중․고등학생의 학력변화" 한국교육과정 평가원 2008

8 Brecht Forum, "http://brecht forum.org/zizek"

9 Zižk, Slavoj, "The Sublime Object of Ideology in 이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" 인간사랑 2002

10 Zižk,Slavoj, "The Iraqi Borrowed Kettle in 이라크" 도서출판 b 2004

11 Telegraph, "Telegraph(2010). 5. July"

12 Wikipedia, "Slavoj Žižek"

13 김원호, "S.지젝의 비평담론 연구" 경북대학교 2007

14 The European Graduate School, "Graduate School & Post Graduate Studies"

15 오마이 뉴스, "6월 18일" 2010

16 경향신문, "4월 29일"

17 시사IN, "4월 25일"

18 교육과학기술부, "2008년 주요 국정과제 실행계획" 2008

19 교육과학기술부, "10월 30일 보도자료"