RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      經濟成長을 위한 企業課稅에 關한 硏究 = A Study on the Business Taxation for Economic Growth in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75029592

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In general, public capital formation and various forms of government expenditures have active effects on accelerating economic growth. The productive effects of the expenditures can only be realized by suppressing private purchasing power through taxation and relieving a part to national resources from private use. Therefore, taxation indirectly accelerates economic growth through government expenditures. The effects of taxation itself on economic growth, however, are generally harmful. Taxation has unfavorable effects on the willingness and ability of private sector for the Labor, saving investment and technological progress. The long-range objective of the taxation policy, therefore, is to secure tax revenue in such a way that the harmful effects of taxation may be minimized and active incentives must be given to the willingness and ability of the private sector. The taxation policy to solve this problem is generally called incentive taxation. Important forms of the incentive taxation are business taxes individual income taxes. Therefore, when we discuss taxation policy, the growth of GNP and NNW(net national welfare), it is important to clarify the manner how business taxes and individual income taxes have unfavorable effects on the growth of GNP and NNW, and to search for the proper method of the taxation for business taxes and individual income taxes form the point of view of ecfnomic incentive. Based on the foregoing consideration, I came to the following conclusion:
      Reducing or exempting tax on the capital gains, the interest from saving, and its capital proper would increase willingness and ability of private sector to save and lessen harmful effects of business taxes and individual income taxes on personal savings, thus contributing on the economic growth. But, if this policy is applied uniformly, the result will be that higher income groups would bear comparatively less tax burden. Also, if the scheduler taxation is overemphasized, the effects of increased progressive taxation, which is the characteristic feature of global taxation in the revised bill, will be greatly lessened. Therefore, from the point of view of fair tax burden, it is necessary to apply different allowance rate according to the amount of total taxable income or to set up upper limit on deduction or exemption of tax. On the other hand, the tax exemption limit on transfer income tax on land or house should be set up for small income groups.
      As to the means of lessening harmful effects of corporation tax on investment, it would be better if such tax reduction policy should encourage investment or help increase internal fund. Therefore, it is generally understood that less tax. rate on reserved profits would be better than general tax deduct system, and it would be even better to adopt special depreciation system or investment allowance system. It is prescribed in the revised bill that only one of the three systems should be able to apply to the strategic industries, and deducted fund must be used only for designated purposes. Considering highly modernized industrial structure and fair tax burden, the revised bill is much more appropriate than the present tax regulations. From the point of view of economic incentive, it is the consumption-type that is most suitable to Korea among various value-added taxes.
      In order to increase poofits and labor productivity and wages, we should have a guide-post policy for the wage system of labor productivity, and all the businesses should raise the wages by adopting the policy, whereas the government should impose less tax rate on value-added tax. Consequently it is believed that the welfare of the laborers will be much more improved than before.
      Such a taxation policy will eventually lead to the growth of NNW as well as well-blanced economic growth in both supply and demand.
      번역하기

      In general, public capital formation and various forms of government expenditures have active effects on accelerating economic growth. The productive effects of the expenditures can only be realized by suppressing private purchasing power through taxa...

      In general, public capital formation and various forms of government expenditures have active effects on accelerating economic growth. The productive effects of the expenditures can only be realized by suppressing private purchasing power through taxation and relieving a part to national resources from private use. Therefore, taxation indirectly accelerates economic growth through government expenditures. The effects of taxation itself on economic growth, however, are generally harmful. Taxation has unfavorable effects on the willingness and ability of private sector for the Labor, saving investment and technological progress. The long-range objective of the taxation policy, therefore, is to secure tax revenue in such a way that the harmful effects of taxation may be minimized and active incentives must be given to the willingness and ability of the private sector. The taxation policy to solve this problem is generally called incentive taxation. Important forms of the incentive taxation are business taxes individual income taxes. Therefore, when we discuss taxation policy, the growth of GNP and NNW(net national welfare), it is important to clarify the manner how business taxes and individual income taxes have unfavorable effects on the growth of GNP and NNW, and to search for the proper method of the taxation for business taxes and individual income taxes form the point of view of ecfnomic incentive. Based on the foregoing consideration, I came to the following conclusion:
      Reducing or exempting tax on the capital gains, the interest from saving, and its capital proper would increase willingness and ability of private sector to save and lessen harmful effects of business taxes and individual income taxes on personal savings, thus contributing on the economic growth. But, if this policy is applied uniformly, the result will be that higher income groups would bear comparatively less tax burden. Also, if the scheduler taxation is overemphasized, the effects of increased progressive taxation, which is the characteristic feature of global taxation in the revised bill, will be greatly lessened. Therefore, from the point of view of fair tax burden, it is necessary to apply different allowance rate according to the amount of total taxable income or to set up upper limit on deduction or exemption of tax. On the other hand, the tax exemption limit on transfer income tax on land or house should be set up for small income groups.
      As to the means of lessening harmful effects of corporation tax on investment, it would be better if such tax reduction policy should encourage investment or help increase internal fund. Therefore, it is generally understood that less tax. rate on reserved profits would be better than general tax deduct system, and it would be even better to adopt special depreciation system or investment allowance system. It is prescribed in the revised bill that only one of the three systems should be able to apply to the strategic industries, and deducted fund must be used only for designated purposes. Considering highly modernized industrial structure and fair tax burden, the revised bill is much more appropriate than the present tax regulations. From the point of view of economic incentive, it is the consumption-type that is most suitable to Korea among various value-added taxes.
      In order to increase poofits and labor productivity and wages, we should have a guide-post policy for the wage system of labor productivity, and all the businesses should raise the wages by adopting the policy, whereas the government should impose less tax rate on value-added tax. Consequently it is believed that the welfare of the laborers will be much more improved than before.
      Such a taxation policy will eventually lead to the growth of NNW as well as well-blanced economic growth in both supply and demand.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 韓國經濟의 實態와 그 成長要因
      • 1. 韓國經濟의 實態
      • 2. 韓國經濟의 成長要因
      • Ⅲ. 企業課稅의 貯蓄效果
      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 韓國經濟의 實態와 그 成長要因
      • 1. 韓國經濟의 實態
      • 2. 韓國經濟의 成長要因
      • Ⅲ. 企業課稅의 貯蓄效果
      • 1. 企業課稅의 轉嫁와 歸着
      • 2. 企業課稅의 貯蓄沮害的 效果
      • 3. 個人所得稅와 個人貯蓄
      • Ⅳ. 企業課稅의 投資效果
      • 1. 法人稅와 企業投資
      • 2. 附加價値稅와 企業投資
      • Ⅴ. 企業課稅와 勞動生産性
      • 1. 企業課稅와 勞動의 需給
      • 2. 企業課稅와 勞動生産性向上
      • Ⅵ. 結論
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼