RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    분배 불공정성과 관계 갈등이 지식축적에 미치는 영향: 인센티브 민감성 및 업무 의존도의 역할 = Influence of Distributive Injustice and Relation Conflict on Knowledge Hoarding: Role of Sensitivity to Incentive and Task Interdependence

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108896205

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    코로나19 사태를 겪으면서, 조직들은 지식 자원의 체계적인 관리가 조직 내 업무 효율성 및 성과를 높임을 인식하게 되었으며, 지식관리에 많은 투자를 하고 있다. 하지만, 지속성 관점에서 지식관리 체계가 확립되기 위해서는 조직원의 능동적인 지식공유 참여 활동이 요구된다. 본 연구는 개인이 지식을 소유하고자 하는 관점인 지식축적을 적용하고, 조직 환경, 개인 특성, 업무 특성을 반영하여 지식축적 원인에 대한 메커니즘을 설명하고자 한다. 연구는 지식관리 정책 또는 시스템을 구축한 기업에 다니는 근로자를 대상으로 설문하였으며, 확보한 381건의 표본을 AMOS 22.0과 Process 3.1 매크로에 반영하여 가설을 검정하였다. 결과는 지식공유에 대한 분배 불공정성이 지식공유와 관련된 관계 갈등을 유발하여, 개인의 지식축적을 높이는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 인센티브 민감성이 분배 불공정성과 상호작용 효과를 일으켜 지식축적을 높였으며, 업무 상호작용성이 분배 불공정성 및 관계 갈등과 상호작용 효과를 일으켜 지식축적을 감소시켰다. 본 연구의 결과는 조직 내부의 지식축적을 억제하기 위한 조직의 지식관리 전략의 수립에 기여 한다.
    번역하기

    코로나19 사태를 겪으면서, 조직들은 지식 자원의 체계적인 관리가 조직 내 업무 효율성 및 성과를 높임을 인식하게 되었으며, 지식관리에 많은 투자를 하고 있다. 하지만, 지속성 관점에서 ...

    코로나19 사태를 겪으면서, 조직들은 지식 자원의 체계적인 관리가 조직 내 업무 효율성 및 성과를 높임을 인식하게 되었으며, 지식관리에 많은 투자를 하고 있다. 하지만, 지속성 관점에서 지식관리 체계가 확립되기 위해서는 조직원의 능동적인 지식공유 참여 활동이 요구된다. 본 연구는 개인이 지식을 소유하고자 하는 관점인 지식축적을 적용하고, 조직 환경, 개인 특성, 업무 특성을 반영하여 지식축적 원인에 대한 메커니즘을 설명하고자 한다. 연구는 지식관리 정책 또는 시스템을 구축한 기업에 다니는 근로자를 대상으로 설문하였으며, 확보한 381건의 표본을 AMOS 22.0과 Process 3.1 매크로에 반영하여 가설을 검정하였다. 결과는 지식공유에 대한 분배 불공정성이 지식공유와 관련된 관계 갈등을 유발하여, 개인의 지식축적을 높이는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 인센티브 민감성이 분배 불공정성과 상호작용 효과를 일으켜 지식축적을 높였으며, 업무 상호작용성이 분배 불공정성 및 관계 갈등과 상호작용 효과를 일으켜 지식축적을 감소시켰다. 본 연구의 결과는 조직 내부의 지식축적을 억제하기 위한 조직의 지식관리 전략의 수립에 기여 한다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In light of the COVID-19 incident, organizations have recognized the importance of systematically managing knowledge resources to enhance work efficiency and performance within the organization. We have adopted the perspective of knowledge hoarding, which entails the ownership of individual knowledge, and aim to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that contribute to knowledge hoarding by considering the organizational environment, personal characteristics, and task characteristics. To test our hypothesis, we conducted a survey among employees working in companies that have implemented knowledge management policies or systems. We obtained a total of 381 samples, which were analyzed using AMOS 22.0 and Process 3.1 macros. Our findings reveal that distributive injustice leads to conflicts relationships and subsequently increases individual knowledge hoarding. Furthermore, we found that sensitivity to incentive interacts with distributive injustice, further exacerbating knowledge hoarding. Conversely, task interdependence mitigates knowledge hoarding by interacting with distributive injustice and relation conflict. These results contribute to the development of effective organizational knowledge management strategies aimed at curbing knowledge hoarding within the organization.
    번역하기

    In light of the COVID-19 incident, organizations have recognized the importance of systematically managing knowledge resources to enhance work efficiency and performance within the organization. We have adopted the perspective of knowledge hoarding, w...

    In light of the COVID-19 incident, organizations have recognized the importance of systematically managing knowledge resources to enhance work efficiency and performance within the organization. We have adopted the perspective of knowledge hoarding, which entails the ownership of individual knowledge, and aim to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that contribute to knowledge hoarding by considering the organizational environment, personal characteristics, and task characteristics. To test our hypothesis, we conducted a survey among employees working in companies that have implemented knowledge management policies or systems. We obtained a total of 381 samples, which were analyzed using AMOS 22.0 and Process 3.1 macros. Our findings reveal that distributive injustice leads to conflicts relationships and subsequently increases individual knowledge hoarding. Furthermore, we found that sensitivity to incentive interacts with distributive injustice, further exacerbating knowledge hoarding. Conversely, task interdependence mitigates knowledge hoarding by interacting with distributive injustice and relation conflict. These results contribute to the development of effective organizational knowledge management strategies aimed at curbing knowledge hoarding within the organization.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김진수 ; 황인호, "혁신적 조직 구조 확립이 사내 기업가정신과 기업 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 42 (42): 245-274, 2020

    2 황인호, "지식관리시스템을 활용한 지식공유 의도 향상에 대한 연구: 기술수용모델, 업무 스트레스, 공유 분위기를 중심으로" 한국산업정보학회 26 (26): 17-34, 2021

    3 Siew H. Chan, "The moderating roles of subjective (perceived) and objective task complexity in system use and performance" Elsevier BV 51 : 393-402, 2015

    4 Blakely, G. L., "The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensitivity on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors" 20 : 259-273, 2005

    5 Khan, A. K., "The Mediating Role of Discrete Emotions in the Relationship between Injustice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors : A Study in Pakistan" 28 : 49-61, 2013

    6 Sharma, R., "The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation" JSTOR 31 (31): 219-, 2007

    7 Wang, X., "Technostress among University Teachers in Higher Education : A Study Using Multidimensional Person-environment Misfit Theory" 10 : 1791-, 2019

    8 Ayyagari, R., "Technostress : Technological Antecedents and Implications" 35 (35): 831-858, 2011

    9 Aibinu, A. A., "Structural Equation Modelling of Organizational Justice and Cooperative Behaviour in the Construction Project Claims Process : Contractors' Perspectives" 29 (29): 463-481, 2011

    10 Schreurs, B., "Speaking Up When Feeling Job Insecure : The Moderating Role of Punishment and Reward Sensitivity" 28 (28): 1107-1128, 2015

    1 김진수 ; 황인호, "혁신적 조직 구조 확립이 사내 기업가정신과 기업 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 42 (42): 245-274, 2020

    2 황인호, "지식관리시스템을 활용한 지식공유 의도 향상에 대한 연구: 기술수용모델, 업무 스트레스, 공유 분위기를 중심으로" 한국산업정보학회 26 (26): 17-34, 2021

    3 Siew H. Chan, "The moderating roles of subjective (perceived) and objective task complexity in system use and performance" Elsevier BV 51 : 393-402, 2015

    4 Blakely, G. L., "The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensitivity on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors" 20 : 259-273, 2005

    5 Khan, A. K., "The Mediating Role of Discrete Emotions in the Relationship between Injustice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors : A Study in Pakistan" 28 : 49-61, 2013

    6 Sharma, R., "The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation" JSTOR 31 (31): 219-, 2007

    7 Wang, X., "Technostress among University Teachers in Higher Education : A Study Using Multidimensional Person-environment Misfit Theory" 10 : 1791-, 2019

    8 Ayyagari, R., "Technostress : Technological Antecedents and Implications" 35 (35): 831-858, 2011

    9 Aibinu, A. A., "Structural Equation Modelling of Organizational Justice and Cooperative Behaviour in the Construction Project Claims Process : Contractors' Perspectives" 29 (29): 463-481, 2011

    10 Schreurs, B., "Speaking Up When Feeling Job Insecure : The Moderating Role of Punishment and Reward Sensitivity" 28 (28): 1107-1128, 2015

    11 Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory" McGraw-Hill 1978

    12 Yazdanmehr, A., "Peers Matter : The Moderating Role of Social Influence on Information Security Policy Compliance" 30 (30): 791-844, 2020

    13 Zhang, Z., "Organizational Rewards and Knowledge Hiding : Task Attributes as Contingencies" 59 (59): 2385-2404, 2021

    14 Judge, T. A., "Organizational Justice and Stress : The Mediating Role of Work-family Conflict" 89 (89): 395-404, 2004

    15 Jahanzeb, S., "Organizational Injustice and Knowledge Hiding : The Roles of Organizational Dis-identification and Benevolence" 59 (59): 446-462, 2021

    16 Colquitt, J. A., "On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice : A Construct Validation of a Measure" 86 (86): 386-400, 2001

    17 Hystad, S. W., "Moral Disengagement as a Mechanism between Perceptions of Organisational Injustice and Deviant Work Behaviours" 68 : 138-145, 2014

    18 Dalkir, K., "Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice" Routledge 2013

    19 Market Research, "Knowledge Management Market Research Reports & Industry Analysis" 2022

    20 Anand, P., "Knowledge Hiding in Organizations : Everything That Managers Need to Know" 33 (33): 12-15, 2019

    21 Connelly, C. E., "Knowledge Hiding in Organizations" 33 (33): 64-88, 2012

    22 Fong, P. S., "Knowledge Hiding and Team Creativity : The Contingent Role of Task Interdependence" 56 (56): 329-343, 2018

    23 Afshan, G., "It’s not Justice if It’s not for All : Cross-level Interaction of Interactional Justice Differentiation and Supervisory Justice on Psychological Safety and Conflict" 33 (33): 782-811, 2022

    24 Hayes, A. F., "Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach" Guilford Publications 2017

    25 Losada-Otalora, M., "Interpersonal Conflict at Work and Knowledge Hiding in Service Organizations : The Mediator Role of Employee Well-being" 13 (13): 63-90, 2020

    26 Oubrich, M., "Impacts of Leadership Style, Organizational Design and HRM Practices on Knowledge Hiding : The Indirect Roles of Organizational Justice and Competitive Work Environment" 137 : 488-499, 2021

    27 Mohammad Jamal Albana, "Impact of linguistic ostracism on knowledge sharing, hiding and hoarding and the moderating role of cultural intelligence" Emerald 51 (51): 1180-1198, 2021

    28 Liu, Y., "Identity, Moral, and Equity Perspectives on the Relationship between Experienced Injustice and Time Theft" 118 : 73-83, 2013

    29 김영균, "IS 인력의 조직내 갈등이 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국산업정보학회 15 (15): 71-81, 2010

    30 Peng, H., "How and When Intragroup Relationship Conflict Leads to Knowledge Hiding : The Roles of Envy and Trait Competitiveness" 32 (32): 383-406, 2021

    31 Rosenbaum, M. E., "Group Productivity and Process : Pure and Mixed Reward Structures and Task Interdependence" 39 (39): 626-642, 1980

    32 Semerci, B. A., "Examination of Knowledge Hiding with Conflict, Competition and Personal Values" 30 (30): 111-131, 2019

    33 Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

    34 Tooranloo, H. S., "Evaluating Knowledge Management Failure Factors Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy FMEA Approach" 57 (57): 183-205, 2018

    35 Erkutlu, H., "Empowering Leadership and Organizational Job Embeddedness : The Moderating Roles of Task Interdependence and Organizational Politics" 210 : 3-10, 2015

    36 Alalwan, J. A., "Decision Support Capabilities of Enterprise Content Management Systems : An Empirical Investigation" 68 : 39-48, 2014

    37 Bentler, P. M., "Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models" 107 (107): 238-246, 1990

    38 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research : A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

    39 Abubakar, A. M., "Applying Artificial Intelligence Technique to Predict Knowledge Hiding Behavior" 49 : 45-57, 2019

    40 Huo, W., "Antecedents and Intervention Mechanisms : A Multi-level Study of R&D Team’s Knowledge Hiding Behavior" 20 (20): 880-897, 2016

    41 Chatterjee, S., "Antecedents and Consequences of Knowledge Hiding : The Moderating Role of Knowledge Hiders and Knowledge Seekers in Organizations" 128 : 303-313, 2021

    42 Wixom, B. H., "An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success" 25 (25): 17-41, 2001

    43 Adams, J. S, "Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2)" Academic Press 267-299, 1965

    44 Venkatesh, V., "A Cultural Contingency Model of Knowledge Sharing and Job Performance" 140 : 202-219, 2022

    45 Jiacheng, W., "A Cognitive Model of Intra-organizational Knowledge-sharing Motivations in the View of Cross-culture" 30 (30): 220-230, 2010

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼