인격권 침해에 있어서 금지청구에 대한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Generally, the Civil Act intends to protect free economic activity by individual property right which mainly divides into property act and family act. Such concept and definition of the Civil Act is based on property act, and human’s status of the modern Civil Act. To the contrary, there was a transformation and change in the perspective of the Civil Act today compared with the modern Civil Act which mainly focused on property act. Recently, there was a trend of change in the Civil Act concept in the Civil Act academy. It means the transformation to the Civil Act view「from an act of capitalism economic society’ act (for commodity exchange) to an act of civil society (and civilian)」. In the center is the stress on the personal rights. Reflecting such change, recently, Civil Act is called as ‘basic act of civil society’ or ‘constitution of civil right’ becoming an important rights concept that are compatible to property rights. Personal rights has attributes of life, body, health, liberty, honor and privacy and can be defined a sum of profit protected by the infringement of the 3rd party for a free development. This study aims to describe the legal relief measure and any special consideration different to other legal rights and profits if there is an infringement or under threat of infringement of personal rights or personal profit by the 3rd party. To respond such matters, it needs to clarify illegal actions, and the scope of personal rights or personal profits in every order of Civil Act order and any other order related to Civil Act. As personal rights are the basis in the requirements of injunction, the foundation of personal rights, i.e. the rights perspective is important. Accordingly, it examines two personal rights as traditional problem handing method and social construction principle which are two trends of personal rights protection. It is followed by the examination of the concept of personal rights on the basis of rights perspective of personal rights.
And, if there is any infringement or under threat of infringement, it is impossible to restore it to the original form. Thus, It pays attention to the requirements of injunction as a measure of legal relief of protection any infringement in advance. In case that the requirements of injunction is admitted, it examines the basis of such admission, and the subject of requesting injunction, conditions of requesting injunction, reduction of burden of proof, transfer of burden of proof, expiry term of indemnity by the infringement. If there is any concern of the infringement of personal rights, it seems property to introduce and legalize the requirements of injunction as legal relief. As such, it is meaningful as it can increase its efficacy for actual and factual regulations beyond simple formative, declarative or nominal regulation. By reflecting such significant change of the Civil Act, the provision on personal rights are introduced in the revision of personal rights plan in Korea, and various scholars suggest the legislation of personal rights. It aims to suggest an introduction of the revision of Civil Act in Korea by suggesting the revision plan of personal rights and the requirements of injunction as legal relief.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김재형, "인격권에 관한 판례의 동향" 한국민사법학회 (27) : 349-399, 2005

2 김재형, "인격권에 관한 입법제안" 한국민사법학회 57 : 41-107, 2011

3 이은영, "소비자법과 민법" 세창출판사 2010

4 송오식, "불법행위의 효과로서 금지 및 예방청구권 －대법원 2010. 8. 25.자 2008마1541 결정－" 법학연구소 31 (31): 519-558, 2011

5 위계찬, "불법행위의 금지청구권" 비교법학연구소 33 : 247-280, 2011

6 김상중, "불법행위에 대한 금지청구권 규정의 신설 제안" 한국민사법학회 55 (55): 177-233, 2011

7 양창수, "민법입문(제5판)" 박영사 2011

8 김상용, "민법과 민사특별법의 관계-민사특별법의 정리방향을 중심으로-" 한국민사법학회 (18) : 2000

9 지원림, "민법강의" 홍문사 2012

10 김종현, "금지청구권의 허용을 위한 기준" 서울대학교 법학평론 편집위원회 2 : 2011

11 星野英一, "私法における人間―民法財産法を中心として―, In 基本民法１―人" 岩波書店 1983

12 大塚直, "生活妨害の差止に関する裁判例の分析(4・完)" (650) :

13 大塚直, "生活妨害の差止に関する基礎的考察(二)" 103 (103): 1986

14 大阪弁護士会環境権研究会, "環境権"

15 山本敬三, "現代社会におけるリベラリズムと私的自治(1)・(2・完)" 133 (133):

16 小橋一郎訳, "現代ローマ法体系第1巻" 1993

17 笹倉秀夫, "法哲学講義" 東京大学出版会 2002

18 大村敦志, "民法読解総則編" 有斐閣 2009

19 木村和成, "民事紛争における人格権の機能について―人格権の再定位の観点から―" (38) : 2008

20 장병일, "死者의 생전 법률행위와 사후 人格의 보호 - 대판 2008.11.20. 2007다27670(전원합의체) 판결을 중심으로-" 한독사회과학회 20 (20): 137-162, 2010

21 吉田克己, "景観利益』の法的保護" (1120) :

22 藤岡康宏, "日本型権利論の法実現と民法理論, 民法理論と企業法制"

23 広中俊雄, "新版民法綱要(第1巻総論)" 創文社 2006

24 藤岡康宏, "損害賠償法の構造" 成文堂 2002

25 橋本泰宏, "損害賠償法" 不磨書房 2003

26 木村和成, "我が国における人格権概念の特質(一)" (34) : 2005

27 青柳武彦, "情報化時代のプライバシー研究—個の尊敬と公共性の調和に向けて—" NTT出版 2008

28 根本尚徳, "差止請求権の発生根拠に関する理論的考察(4)—差止請求権の基礎理論序説—" 81 (81): 2006

29 根本尚徳, "差止請求権の発生根拠に関する理論的考察(2)—差止請求権の基礎理論序説—" 80 (80): 2005

30 根本尚徳, "差止請求権の発生根拠に関する理論的考察(1)—差止請求権の基礎理論序説—" 80 (80): 2005

31 根本尚徳, "差止請求権の発生根拠に関する理論的考察(1)-(9․未完)" 80 (80): 2005

32 根本尙德, "差止請求権の理論" 有斐閣 2011

33 川嶋四郎, "差止的救済の有用性に関する一展望—新たな民事救済の世紀に寄せて—" (1062) : 2001

34 角森正雄, "差止めと損害賠償との関係について" (1062) : 2001

35 大村敦志, "基本民法Ⅰ総則・物権総論(第3版)" 有斐閣 2007

36 沢井, "公害差止の法理(増補第2刷)" 日本評論社 1979

37 内田貴, "債権法の新時代―「債権法改正の基本方針」の概要―"

38 潮見佳男, "債権各論Ⅱ・不法行為法" 新世社 2009

39 大塚直, "保護法益としての人身と人格" (1126) : 1998

40 大塚直, "保護としての人身と人格" (1126) : 1998

41 洪春義, "人格權의 保護에 관한 硏究" 全北大學校 大學院 1990

42 이창현, "人格權侵害의 救濟手段에 대한 法制史的 考察" 법학연구소 12 (12): 437-469, 2010

43 五十嵐清, "人格権論" 一粒社 1989

44 五十嵐清, "人格権法概説" 有斐閣 2003

45 斉藤博, "人格権法の研究" 一粒社 1979

46 石井智弥, "人格権保護の基礎理論─民法における「人間の尊厳」の保障─" 日本私法学会 (73) :

47 淡路剛久, "人格権・環境権に基づく差止請求権" (1062) : 2001

48 三島宗彦, "人格権の保護" 有斐閣 1965

49 大塚直, "人格権に基づく差止請求—他の構成による差止との関係を中心として —" 116 (116): 1997

50 大塚直, "人格権に基づく差止請求—他の構成による差止との関係を中心として —" 116 (116): 1997

51 大塚直, "人格権に基づく差止請求" 116 (116): 1997

52 山本敬三, "人格権, In 民法の争点" 2007

53 斎藤博, "人格価値の保護と民法" 一粒社 1986

54 吉村良一, "不法行為法(第4版)" 有斐閣 2010

55 窪田充見, "不法行為法" 有斐閣 2008

56 潮見佳男, "不法行為法" 信山社 1999

57 吉村良一, "不法行為の差止訴訟, In 民法の争点" 有斐閣 2007

58 内藤篤, "パブリシティ権概説(第2版)" 木鐸社 49-, 2005

59 原島重義, "わが国における権利論の推移" (4) : 1976