RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일본의 개인정보보호법제의 최근 동향 = 「개인정보의 보호에 관한 법률안」을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76189066

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In Japan, to protect personal information by government there's been 「Act on the Protection of Personal Information by Administrative Agencies」since 1988 in the public sphere. On the other hand, in the civil sphere there isn't any general act like that, they have protected several kinds of personal data repectively by special laws like 「Protection of Communications Secrets Act」, 「Use and Protection of Credit Information Act」, etc. and the rest has been charged to self-regulation of buisiness sectors. So 「Bill of Protection of Personal Information」is being submitted to the legislative body.
    The bill will serve as an organic law by clarifing the fundamental rule of personal data protection applying both public and civil area. At the same time it will serve as a general law of civil area and apply the rule to the business sectors dealing with personal data. Also the bill includes an Escape Clause(Art. 55) and a Consideration Clause(Art. 40) to solve the contradiction between constitutional rights and administrative control.
    With reference to Japanese legal policy, we should adopt the omnibus legal style over the public and civil area, and advance the strict regulation system specifically in public area. In respect to civil area, establishing a general statute law for personal information, we should make sectoral approaches to each area handling sensitive personal data (like financeㆍcredit, medical care, education, telecommunication). In addition, with considering the harmony between utility of personal data and protection of personal data unlike public area, we should do our best to balance between self-regulation and administrative control.
    번역하기

    In Japan, to protect personal information by government there's been 「Act on the Protection of Personal Information by Administrative Agencies」since 1988 in the public sphere. On the other hand, in the civil sphere there isn't any general act like...

    In Japan, to protect personal information by government there's been 「Act on the Protection of Personal Information by Administrative Agencies」since 1988 in the public sphere. On the other hand, in the civil sphere there isn't any general act like that, they have protected several kinds of personal data repectively by special laws like 「Protection of Communications Secrets Act」, 「Use and Protection of Credit Information Act」, etc. and the rest has been charged to self-regulation of buisiness sectors. So 「Bill of Protection of Personal Information」is being submitted to the legislative body.
    The bill will serve as an organic law by clarifing the fundamental rule of personal data protection applying both public and civil area. At the same time it will serve as a general law of civil area and apply the rule to the business sectors dealing with personal data. Also the bill includes an Escape Clause(Art. 55) and a Consideration Clause(Art. 40) to solve the contradiction between constitutional rights and administrative control.
    With reference to Japanese legal policy, we should adopt the omnibus legal style over the public and civil area, and advance the strict regulation system specifically in public area. In respect to civil area, establishing a general statute law for personal information, we should make sectoral approaches to each area handling sensitive personal data (like financeㆍcredit, medical care, education, telecommunication). In addition, with considering the harmony between utility of personal data and protection of personal data unlike public area, we should do our best to balance between self-regulation and administrative control.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서설-개인정보보호제도의 연혁
    • Ⅱ. 개인정보보호법제의 현황
    • Ⅲ. 개인정보보호법제화의 최근 동향
    • Ⅳ. 「개인정보의 보호에 관한 법률안」(「個人情報の保護に關する法律案」)의 성격과 내용
    • Ⅴ. 결어
    • Ⅰ. 서설-개인정보보호제도의 연혁
    • Ⅱ. 개인정보보호법제의 현황
    • Ⅲ. 개인정보보호법제화의 최근 동향
    • Ⅳ. 「개인정보의 보호에 관한 법률안」(「個人情報の保護に關する法律案」)의 성격과 내용
    • Ⅴ. 결어
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.07 1.07 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.08 1.07 1.097 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼