RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    552년 백제의 한강유역 포기[棄]와 신라,고구려의 밀약설(密約說) = Baekje`s Resignation of the Hangang Basin and the Secret Treaty between Silla and Goguryeo in 552

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100057957

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    From the beginning of King Seong`s reign, Baekje suffered from Goguryeo`s military attacks, and after being defeated by Goguryeo in the Battle of 529, Baekje moved its capital. King Seong had two important missions: he had to defend Baekje from Goguryeo on the one hand, and he had to keep Kaya from breaking away on the other. In order to overcome the crisis, King Seong carried out a dual foreign policy. Clearly indentifying the mutual enemy, he formed an alliance with Silla or Kaya and with Japan. This was to fortify its power through war as well as to prevent the severance of the alliance. From the year 523 to 538, Baekje kept two war fronts. On the northern front, Baekje was struggling with Goguryeo`s attacks, and on the southern front, it was in conflict with Kaya over the occupation of the Sum-Jin Basin. Baekje conducted a non-violent campaign in the Anla region; however, after Geum-Gwan Kaya surrendered to Silla, it fell into a difficult situation. After the year of 541, Baekje implemented an aggressive foreign policy in the Kaya region. As a result, Baekje was able to put Dae Kaya under its control. Also, after the annexation with Silla, Baekje launched aggressive military assaults against Goguryeo. Baekje was able to do this by taking advantage of Goguryeo`s state of internal affairs at that time. However, it would have been impossible if it were not for the help of Silla. Silla, recognizing the importance of its role, demanded compensation for its military assistance, and Baekje ceded Silla a large portion of territory that it had gained between 550 and 551. In the mean time, King Seong constantly claimed that Baekje was being attacked by the allies of Goguryeo and Silla, with the intent to draw Kaya and Japan into its forces. Through this strategy, Backje, until 551, was able to form an alliance that included Silla during the battles with Goguryeo, and to mobilize troops from Kaya and Japan during the battles with Silla. Hence, it is problematic to view Baekje`s resignation of Hansung and Pyongyang nd the marrying of its princess to the King of Silla as an act of retreat, simply a esult of Silla and Goguryeo`s secret treaty. Although the treaty was for the mutual nterests of Silla and Goguryeo, as evidenced in the erection of the Hwangchoryong nd Maunryong steles(568), it is problematic to view Silla`s occupation of the Han asin and its northeastern territorial expansion after the Gwansansung Battle simply as a esult of the secret treaty with Goguryeo. To conclude, the Gwansansung Battle was ntended to be a turning point for Baekje. It was a battle in which Baekje planned to ttack Goguryeo with the help of Silla, to take Kaya under control, and then, to attack illa.
    번역하기

    From the beginning of King Seong`s reign, Baekje suffered from Goguryeo`s military attacks, and after being defeated by Goguryeo in the Battle of 529, Baekje moved its capital. King Seong had two important missions: he had to defend Baekje from Gogury...

    From the beginning of King Seong`s reign, Baekje suffered from Goguryeo`s military attacks, and after being defeated by Goguryeo in the Battle of 529, Baekje moved its capital. King Seong had two important missions: he had to defend Baekje from Goguryeo on the one hand, and he had to keep Kaya from breaking away on the other. In order to overcome the crisis, King Seong carried out a dual foreign policy. Clearly indentifying the mutual enemy, he formed an alliance with Silla or Kaya and with Japan. This was to fortify its power through war as well as to prevent the severance of the alliance. From the year 523 to 538, Baekje kept two war fronts. On the northern front, Baekje was struggling with Goguryeo`s attacks, and on the southern front, it was in conflict with Kaya over the occupation of the Sum-Jin Basin. Baekje conducted a non-violent campaign in the Anla region; however, after Geum-Gwan Kaya surrendered to Silla, it fell into a difficult situation. After the year of 541, Baekje implemented an aggressive foreign policy in the Kaya region. As a result, Baekje was able to put Dae Kaya under its control. Also, after the annexation with Silla, Baekje launched aggressive military assaults against Goguryeo. Baekje was able to do this by taking advantage of Goguryeo`s state of internal affairs at that time. However, it would have been impossible if it were not for the help of Silla. Silla, recognizing the importance of its role, demanded compensation for its military assistance, and Baekje ceded Silla a large portion of territory that it had gained between 550 and 551. In the mean time, King Seong constantly claimed that Baekje was being attacked by the allies of Goguryeo and Silla, with the intent to draw Kaya and Japan into its forces. Through this strategy, Backje, until 551, was able to form an alliance that included Silla during the battles with Goguryeo, and to mobilize troops from Kaya and Japan during the battles with Silla. Hence, it is problematic to view Baekje`s resignation of Hansung and Pyongyang nd the marrying of its princess to the King of Silla as an act of retreat, simply a esult of Silla and Goguryeo`s secret treaty. Although the treaty was for the mutual nterests of Silla and Goguryeo, as evidenced in the erection of the Hwangchoryong nd Maunryong steles(568), it is problematic to view Silla`s occupation of the Han asin and its northeastern territorial expansion after the Gwansansung Battle simply as a esult of the secret treaty with Goguryeo. To conclude, the Gwansansung Battle was ntended to be a turning point for Baekje. It was a battle in which Baekje planned to ttack Goguryeo with the help of Silla, to take Kaya under control, and then, to attack illa.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 金秉柱, "羅濟同盟에 관한 연구" 46 : 1984

    2 金壽泰, "한중관계 2000년 동행과 공유의 역사" 2008

    3 강민식, "증평 이성산성과 道西都西道安縣" 21 : 2013

    4 차용걸, "신라 석축 산성의 성립과 특징" 석당학술원 (41) : 179-230, 2008

    5 김병남, "성왕 초기 가야 지역의 상황과 백제의 대응" 한국사상문화학회 (53) : 77-106, 2010

    6 金周成, "백제사상의 전쟁" 2000

    7 김병남, "백제 성왕대 관산성 전투의 의미" 전북사학회 (36) : 5-31, 2010

    8 주보돈, "백제 聖王의 죽음과 신라의 ‘國法’" 백제문화연구소 1 (1): 129-152, 2012

    9 노중국, "동아세아와 백제" 2003

    10 전덕재, "관산성전투에 대한 새로운 고찰" 신라문화연구소 34 (34): 31-76, 2009

    1 金秉柱, "羅濟同盟에 관한 연구" 46 : 1984

    2 金壽泰, "한중관계 2000년 동행과 공유의 역사" 2008

    3 강민식, "증평 이성산성과 道西都西道安縣" 21 : 2013

    4 차용걸, "신라 석축 산성의 성립과 특징" 석당학술원 (41) : 179-230, 2008

    5 김병남, "성왕 초기 가야 지역의 상황과 백제의 대응" 한국사상문화학회 (53) : 77-106, 2010

    6 金周成, "백제사상의 전쟁" 2000

    7 김병남, "백제 성왕대 관산성 전투의 의미" 전북사학회 (36) : 5-31, 2010

    8 주보돈, "백제 聖王의 죽음과 신라의 ‘國法’" 백제문화연구소 1 (1): 129-152, 2012

    9 노중국, "동아세아와 백제" 2003

    10 전덕재, "관산성전투에 대한 새로운 고찰" 신라문화연구소 34 (34): 31-76, 2009

    11 김영심, "관산성 전투 전후 시기 대가야 백제와 신라의 대립"

    12 김영관, "고구려의 청주지역 진출 시기" 한국고대학회 (25) : 657-674, 2006

    13 閔德植, "高句麗의 道西縣城考" 36 : 1983

    14 盧泰敦, "高句麗의 漢水流域喪失의 原因에 대하여" 13 : 1976

    15 梁起錫, "高句麗의 忠州地域進出과 經營" 6 : 2002

    16 盧重國, "高句麗百濟新羅사이의 力關係變化에 대한 一考" 28 : 1981

    17 양기석, "管山城戰鬪의 樣相과 影響" 12 : 2008

    18 김병남, "百濟의 加耶 進出과 ‘泗沘會議’" 백제연구소 55 (55): 251-272, 2012

    19 梁起錫, "百濟聖王代의 政治改革과 그 性格" 4 : 1990

    20 이도학, "百濟 熊津期 漢江流域支配 問題와 그에 대한 認識" 서울역사편찬원 (73) : 51-98, 2009

    21 정운용, "泗沘都邑期의 百濟" 2007

    22 金甲童, "新羅와 百濟의 管山城戰鬪" 52 : 1999

    23 張彰恩, "新羅慈悲~炤知王代築城交戰地域의 검토와 그 의미" 2 : 2004

    24 成周鐸, "新羅三年山城硏究" 7 : 1976

    25 김주성, "城戰鬪의 背景" 12 : 2008

    26 金泰植, "加耶聯盟史" 일조각 1993

    27 李鎔賢, "加羅(大加耶)를 둘러싼 국제적 환경과 그 대외교섭" 10 : 2000

    28 장창은, "6세기 중반 한강 유역 쟁탈전과 管山城 戰鬪" 진단학회 (111) : 1-43, 2011

    29 주보돈, "5~6세기 중엽 高句麗와 新羅의 관계" 11 : 2006

    30 정재윤, "5~6세기 백제의 南朝 중심 외교정책과 그 의미" 백제문화연구소 2 (2): 173-198, 2009

    31 양기석, "5~6세기 백제의 北界" 20 : 2005

    32 노중국, "5~6세기 고구려와 백제의 관계" 11 : 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.61
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.56 1.438 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼