RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Limitation of High Pitch Sound Perception in Nontumor Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implantation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106054945

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background and Objectives Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) is another option forhearing rehabilitation in non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients who cannot undergo cochlearimplantation (CI). However, the average performance of ABI is worse than that of CI. We analyzedthe psycho-electrical parameters of each electrode and psycho-acoustic response to differentfrequency sounds in nontumor patients with ABI.
      Subjects and Method Sixteen patients with ABI from July 2008 to May 2013 were includedin the study. They were followed up for 4 to 56 months. Among them, 12 were prelingualdeaf with a narrow internal auditory canal or cochlear ossification. The remaining four were postlingualdeaf adults with severely ossified cochleae. We analyzed the electrical parameters [impedance,threshold level (T level), and dynamic range] of each of the 12 electrodes. We alsoevaluated the sound field pure-tone threshold, Ling 6 sound detection-identification test (Ling6 test), and pitch ranking data of these patients.
      Results The impedance, T level, and dynamic range did not significantly differ among electrodes.
      However, the pure-tone threshold to sound field stimulation was elevated in the hightone area, where more variables were found than in the low frequency area. Patients could notidentify /S/ and /Sh/ sounds in the Ling 6 test. The mean T level and the dynamic range of thethree highest pitch-perceiving electrodes in each patient was higher and narrower, respectively,than those of the three lowest pitch-perceiving electrodes.
      Conclusion The nontumor patients with ABI have difficulty perceiving high pitch sound.
      More sophisticated penetrating type electrodes and, if possible, bimodal stimulation with CI,could be considered.
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) is another option forhearing rehabilitation in non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients who cannot undergo cochlearimplantation (CI). However, the average performance of ABI is worse than th...

      Background and Objectives Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) is another option forhearing rehabilitation in non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients who cannot undergo cochlearimplantation (CI). However, the average performance of ABI is worse than that of CI. We analyzedthe psycho-electrical parameters of each electrode and psycho-acoustic response to differentfrequency sounds in nontumor patients with ABI.
      Subjects and Method Sixteen patients with ABI from July 2008 to May 2013 were includedin the study. They were followed up for 4 to 56 months. Among them, 12 were prelingualdeaf with a narrow internal auditory canal or cochlear ossification. The remaining four were postlingualdeaf adults with severely ossified cochleae. We analyzed the electrical parameters [impedance,threshold level (T level), and dynamic range] of each of the 12 electrodes. We alsoevaluated the sound field pure-tone threshold, Ling 6 sound detection-identification test (Ling6 test), and pitch ranking data of these patients.
      Results The impedance, T level, and dynamic range did not significantly differ among electrodes.
      However, the pure-tone threshold to sound field stimulation was elevated in the hightone area, where more variables were found than in the low frequency area. Patients could notidentify /S/ and /Sh/ sounds in the Ling 6 test. The mean T level and the dynamic range of thethree highest pitch-perceiving electrodes in each patient was higher and narrower, respectively,than those of the three lowest pitch-perceiving electrodes.
      Conclusion The nontumor patients with ABI have difficulty perceiving high pitch sound.
      More sophisticated penetrating type electrodes and, if possible, bimodal stimulation with CI,could be considered.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Maini S, "Update on long-term results with auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patients" 10 (10): 33-37, 2009

      2 Kuchta J, "The multichannel auditory brainstem implant: how many electrodes make sense?" 100 (100): 16-23, 2004

      3 Moore JK, "The human auditory brain stem: a comparative view" 29 (29): 1-32, 1987

      4 Ling D, "Speech and the hearing-impaired child: theory and practice" Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing 2002

      5 Vincent C, "Results of the MXM Digisonic auditory brainstem implant clinical trials in Europe" 23 (23): 56-60, 2002

      6 Sennaroglu L, "Preliminary results of auditory brainstem implantation in prelingually deaf children with inner ear malformations including severe stenosis of the cochlear aperture and aplasia of the cochlear nerve" 30 (30): 708-715, 2009

      7 Otto SR, "Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients" 96 (96): 1063-1071, 2002

      8 Ebinger K, "Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: US clinical trial results" (27) : 50-53, 2000

      9 Otto S, "Multichannel auditory brain stem implant: case studies comparing fitting strategies and results" 166 : 36-39, 1995

      10 Colletti V, "Hearing habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in two children with cochlear nerve aplasia" 60 (60): 99-111, 2001

      1 Maini S, "Update on long-term results with auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patients" 10 (10): 33-37, 2009

      2 Kuchta J, "The multichannel auditory brainstem implant: how many electrodes make sense?" 100 (100): 16-23, 2004

      3 Moore JK, "The human auditory brain stem: a comparative view" 29 (29): 1-32, 1987

      4 Ling D, "Speech and the hearing-impaired child: theory and practice" Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing 2002

      5 Vincent C, "Results of the MXM Digisonic auditory brainstem implant clinical trials in Europe" 23 (23): 56-60, 2002

      6 Sennaroglu L, "Preliminary results of auditory brainstem implantation in prelingually deaf children with inner ear malformations including severe stenosis of the cochlear aperture and aplasia of the cochlear nerve" 30 (30): 708-715, 2009

      7 Otto SR, "Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients" 96 (96): 1063-1071, 2002

      8 Ebinger K, "Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: US clinical trial results" (27) : 50-53, 2000

      9 Otto S, "Multichannel auditory brain stem implant: case studies comparing fitting strategies and results" 166 : 36-39, 1995

      10 Colletti V, "Hearing habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in two children with cochlear nerve aplasia" 60 (60): 99-111, 2001

      11 Eisenberg LS, "Electrical stimulation of the auditory brain stem structure in deafened adults" 24 (24): 9-22, 1987

      12 Choi JY, "Early surgical results of auditory brainstem implantation in nontumor patients" 121 (121): 2610-2618, 2011

      13 Schwartz MS, "Auditory brainstem implants" 5 (5): 128-136, 2008

      14 Sennaroglu L, "Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement" 32 (32): 187-191, 2011

      15 Lenarz M, "Auditory brainstem implant part II: subjective assessment of functional outcome" 23 (23): 694-697, 2002

      16 Grayeli AB, "Auditory brainstem implant in bilateral and completely ossified cochleae" 24 (24): 79-82, 2003

      17 Lesinski-Schiedat A, "Auditory brainstem implant in auditory rehabilitation of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: Hannover programme" (27) : 15-17, 2000

      18 Sanna M, "Auditory brainstem implant in a child with severely ossified cochlea" 116 (116): 1700-1703, 2006

      19 Colletti V, "Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children" 133 (133): 126-138, 2005

      20 Otto SR, "Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant" 29 (29): 1147-1154, 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-04-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학 -> 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery -> Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
      KCI등재
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-06-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery -> Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-06-14 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society Of Otolaryngology -> Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head &N -> Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.13 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼