RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      지방정부의 상대적 노인복지 수준에 관한 실증적 연구 = 충청남도 15개 지방정부를 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105540847

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study has been designed to compare local budget level among various communities in Chung-Nam province, Korea. We aimed to explore traditional roots and the policy development of community care for elderly people in Korea, and to analysis the continuation thends affecting its policy development. One of the issues in this study is the different use of the term ‘community care’ in Korea. The term ‘community care’ in the study refers to community-based services that provide an alternative to only family care at home. Since the late 1980s, community care policy for elderly people has concentrated on creating a safety net and on temporary selective measures aiming at protection of the standard of living of the weakest groups. Therefore, formal community care service for elderly people under poverty line was implemented on the based of voluntary home helper in 1987. Since e early 1990s, neo-liberalists have taken at their face value assumed at the state has been being restructured in Korea. Consequently, the community care policy has emphasized a mixed economy of care and the government largely has remained in a minimum role of sustaining community care for elderly people. Thus, no satisfactory recipe has been developed over 20 years of community care for elderly people in Korea. Community care for elderly people is at best a patchy scarf of resources, at worst non-existent in Korea. A clear comprehensive policy is required which sets out the responsibilities of the various agencies and professionals involved in this field.
      번역하기

      This study has been designed to compare local budget level among various communities in Chung-Nam province, Korea. We aimed to explore traditional roots and the policy development of community care for elderly people in Korea, and to analysis the cont...

      This study has been designed to compare local budget level among various communities in Chung-Nam province, Korea. We aimed to explore traditional roots and the policy development of community care for elderly people in Korea, and to analysis the continuation thends affecting its policy development. One of the issues in this study is the different use of the term ‘community care’ in Korea. The term ‘community care’ in the study refers to community-based services that provide an alternative to only family care at home. Since the late 1980s, community care policy for elderly people has concentrated on creating a safety net and on temporary selective measures aiming at protection of the standard of living of the weakest groups. Therefore, formal community care service for elderly people under poverty line was implemented on the based of voluntary home helper in 1987. Since e early 1990s, neo-liberalists have taken at their face value assumed at the state has been being restructured in Korea. Consequently, the community care policy has emphasized a mixed economy of care and the government largely has remained in a minimum role of sustaining community care for elderly people. Thus, no satisfactory recipe has been developed over 20 years of community care for elderly people in Korea. Community care for elderly people is at best a patchy scarf of resources, at worst non-existent in Korea. A clear comprehensive policy is required which sets out the responsibilities of the various agencies and professionals involved in this field.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼