RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      페미니스트 형식주의: 근대 초기 영국 여성 예언문학의 미래 = Feminist Formalism: A Future of Women’ s Prophetic Literature in Early Modern England

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108839956

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper outlines and assesses recent criticism calling for formalist approaches to early modern British women ’ s writing. In doing so, this paper proposes to read women ’ s prophecy through feminist formalism, a research methodology that combines historicist and formalist approaches centering on feminist insight, in order not only to improve a marked tendency to avoid studying women ’ s religious writings in a formalist vein, but also to help resolve the critical disjunction between the study of early modern British women ’ s literature and canonical literature in a creative way. This paper suggests that studying prophetic forms in a integrated literary history that encompasses mainstream and non-mainstream prophetic literature contributes to promote an academic dialogue between the study of noncanonical women writers and canonical male author scholarship. It can bring in new perspectives on the writings of canonical male authors in the context of the broader field of early modern culture beyond merely including women ’ s literature into the canon. It also hopes to provide a case study of investigating Milton and female prophets from an integrative perspective, which shows that analyzing women ’ s writings in relation to the broader literary canon enriches the study of early modern women writers and canonical literature.
      번역하기

      This paper outlines and assesses recent criticism calling for formalist approaches to early modern British women ’ s writing. In doing so, this paper proposes to read women ’ s prophecy through feminist formalism, a research methodology that combi...

      This paper outlines and assesses recent criticism calling for formalist approaches to early modern British women ’ s writing. In doing so, this paper proposes to read women ’ s prophecy through feminist formalism, a research methodology that combines historicist and formalist approaches centering on feminist insight, in order not only to improve a marked tendency to avoid studying women ’ s religious writings in a formalist vein, but also to help resolve the critical disjunction between the study of early modern British women ’ s literature and canonical literature in a creative way. This paper suggests that studying prophetic forms in a integrated literary history that encompasses mainstream and non-mainstream prophetic literature contributes to promote an academic dialogue between the study of noncanonical women writers and canonical male author scholarship. It can bring in new perspectives on the writings of canonical male authors in the context of the broader field of early modern culture beyond merely including women ’ s literature into the canon. It also hopes to provide a case study of investigating Milton and female prophets from an integrative perspective, which shows that analyzing women ’ s writings in relation to the broader literary canon enriches the study of early modern women writers and canonical literature.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Margaret J. M. Ezell, "Writing Women’s Literary History" Johns Hopkins UP 1993

      2 Sasha Roberts, "Women’s Literary Capital in Early Modern England: Formal Composition and Rhetorical Display in Manuscript and Print" 14 (14): 247-, 2007

      3 Diane Purkiss, "Women, Writing, History, 1640-1740" B.T. Batsford Ltd 139-, 1992

      4 Sarah C. E. Ross, "Women, Poetry and Politics in Seventeenth-Century Britain" Oxford UP 15-, 2015

      5 Patricia Crawford, "Women in English Society, 1500-1800" Routledge 196-, 1985

      6 Catharine Gray, "Women Writers and Public Debate in 17th-Century Britain" Palgrave Macmillan 2007

      7 Elizabeth Bouldin, "Women Prophets and Radical Protestantism in the British Atlantic World, 1640-1730" Cambridge UP 2015

      8 Phyllis Mack, "Visionary Women: Ecstatic Prophecy in Seventeenth-Century England" U of California P 1-, 1992

      9 Elaine Hobby, "Virtue of Necessity: English Women’s Writing 1649-88" Virago Press 1988

      10 Danielle Clarke, "The Work of Form: Poetics and Materiality in Early Modern Culture" Oxford UP 2014

      1 Margaret J. M. Ezell, "Writing Women’s Literary History" Johns Hopkins UP 1993

      2 Sasha Roberts, "Women’s Literary Capital in Early Modern England: Formal Composition and Rhetorical Display in Manuscript and Print" 14 (14): 247-, 2007

      3 Diane Purkiss, "Women, Writing, History, 1640-1740" B.T. Batsford Ltd 139-, 1992

      4 Sarah C. E. Ross, "Women, Poetry and Politics in Seventeenth-Century Britain" Oxford UP 15-, 2015

      5 Patricia Crawford, "Women in English Society, 1500-1800" Routledge 196-, 1985

      6 Catharine Gray, "Women Writers and Public Debate in 17th-Century Britain" Palgrave Macmillan 2007

      7 Elizabeth Bouldin, "Women Prophets and Radical Protestantism in the British Atlantic World, 1640-1730" Cambridge UP 2015

      8 Phyllis Mack, "Visionary Women: Ecstatic Prophecy in Seventeenth-Century England" U of California P 1-, 1992

      9 Elaine Hobby, "Virtue of Necessity: English Women’s Writing 1649-88" Virago Press 1988

      10 Danielle Clarke, "The Work of Form: Poetics and Materiality in Early Modern Culture" Oxford UP 2014

      11 Susan Wiseman, "The Oxford Handbook of Milton" Oxford UP 534-546, 2009

      12 Katharine Gillespie, "The Oxford Handbook of Literature and the English Revolution" Oxford UP 462-480, 2012

      13 Danielle Clarke, "The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Women’s Writing in English, 1540-1700" Oxford UP 1-, 2022

      14 Katharine Gillespie, "The History of British Women’s Writing, 1610-1690" Palgrave Macmillan 80-96, 2011

      15 Christopher Hill, "The Experience of Defeat: Milton and Some Contemporaries" Faber and Faber 21-, 1984

      16 Hilary Hinds, "The Cry of a Stone" Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies 31-47, 2000

      17 Lara Dodds, "The Case for a Feminist Return to Form" 13 (13): 82-91, 2018

      18 David Loewenstein, "The Cambridge History of Early Modern English Literature" Cambridge UP 2002

      19 Laura Lunger Knoppers, "The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing" Cambridge UP 4-, 2009

      20 Hilary Hinds, "The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing" Cambridge UP 235-246, 2009

      21 David Loewenstein, "Scriptural Exegesis, Female Prophecy, and Radical Politics in Mary Cary" 46 (46): 133-153, 2006

      22 David Loewenstein, "Representing Revolution in Milton and His Contemporaries: Religion, Politics, and Polemics in Radical Puritanism" Cambridge UP 92-124, 2001

      23 Danielle Clarke, "Renaissance Transformations" Edinburgh UP 114-, 2009

      24 Alice Eardley, "Recreating the Canon: Women Writers and Anthologies of Early Modern Verse" 14 (14): 2007

      25 Sarah Kunjummen, "Reading Milton like a Woman" 63 (63): 76-, 2021

      26 Paul Salzman, "Reading Early Modern Women’s Writing" Oxford UP 109-134, 2006

      27 Christopher Hill, "Radical Prose in 17th Century England: From Marprelate to the Levellers" 32 (32): 95-, 1982

      28 Teresa Feroli, "Political Speaking Justified: Women Prophets and the English Revolution" U of Delaware P 2006

      29 Nigel Smith, "Perfection Proclaimed: Language and Literature in English Radical Religion, 1640-1660" Clarendon Press 1989

      30 Sharon Achinstein, "Milton and the Revolutionary Reader" Princeton UP 3-, 1994

      31 Elizabeth M. Sauer, "Milton and Gender" Cambridge UP 133-152, 2005

      32 Clement Hawes, "Mania and Literary Style: The Rhetoric of Enthusiasm from the Ranters to Christopher Smart" Cambridge UP 1996

      33 Walter S. H. Lim, "John Milton, Radical Politics, and Biblical Republicanism" U of Delaware P 170-210, 2006

      34 Lara Dodds, "Happy Accidents: Critical Belatedness, Feminist Formalism, and Early Modern Women’s Writing" 62 (62): 2020

      35 Hilary Hinds, "God’s Englishwomen: Seventeenth-Century Radical Sectarian Writing and Feminist Criticism" Manchester UP 1996

      36 Elizabeth Scott-Baumann, "Forms of Engagement: Women, Poetry, and Culture, 1640-1680" Oxford UP 2-, 2013

      37 Shannon Miller, "Engendering the Fall: John Milton and Seventeenth-Century Women Writers" U of Pennsylvania P 79-106, 2008

      38 Jaime Goodrich, "Beyond Canonicity: The Future(s) of Early Modern Women Writers" 63 (63): 2021

      39 Rachel Adcock, "Baptist Women’s Writings in Revolutionary Culture, 1640-1680" Ashgate Press 2015

      40 Patricia Phillippy, "A History of Early Modern Women’s Writing" Cambridge UP 2018

      41 W. Scott Howard, "A History of Early Modern Women’s Writing" Cambridge UP 315-331, 2018

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼