한국과 중국의 체포구속제도의 비교연구 = A Comparative Study on the Arrest and Attachment System in Korea and China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The exchange and mutual relation between Korea and China have been improved more and more in many fields since Korea formed a good relationship with China, and also the world of criminal law in Korea has gradually become more interested in the procedure of criminal case of China and has gradually had more exchange with China. From among relatively only a few study and exchange of criminal law system in China as compared with German Law or Anglo-American Law, arrest and attachment much related directly to protection of human rights show features different from ours. This study focuses on arrest and attachment in China rather those in Korea, and compares them with ours by deriving similarities and differences between China and Korea. A suspect is demanded to attend for the investigation by investigation agency, and for hearing a case by court. In this case, there are two systems to demand a suspect to attend, one is the recall without enforcement, and the other is apprehension with enforcement. In addition, there are attachment and arrest to investigate and hear a suspect and the accused for comparatively long time. There is the system of raising a suit by him/herself in China, which the general public can prosecute directly to the court in certain case, and the court in China also can recall, arrest, and arrest because the accused becomes the target for court investigation from the beginning of this case. The arrest can be regarded as the longest and most powerful attachment system in China. In addition, there is another system similar to the a flagrant offense arrest by the code of criminal procedure in Korea. Therefore it can be considered that terms and contents of those systems in China are different from the arrest systems such as a flagrant offense arrest, arrest without warrant, and arrest with warrant, and the attachment to arrest the suspect and accused in Korea.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 李明淸, "留置芻議"

2 신동운, "신형사소송법" 법문사 2008

3 陈瑞华, "评法院审判委员会制度"

4 佚名, "談治安傳喚制度"

5 熊一新, "治安管理處罰法解讀與適用" 法律出版社 2005

6 劉家琛, "新刑事訴訟法條文釋義" 人民法院出版社 1996

7 孔凡勇, "探析刑事证人拒绝出庭作证的原因及对策"

8 卢小传, "废除?保留?!——关于审判委员会制度的讨论"

9 肖建国 肖建光, "审判委员会制度考－兼论取消审判委员会制度的现实基础"

10 王作富, "刑法" 中國人民大學出版社 472-, 2006

11 嚴剛, "刑事証人作証制度及其完善"

12 王國樞, "刑事訴訟法學" 北京大學出版社 1998

13 陳光中, "刑事訴訟法學" 中國政法大學出版社 1997

14 樊崇義, "刑事訴訟法學" 中國政法大學出版社 1996

15 程榮斌, "刑事訴訟法" 中國人民大學出版社 2005

16 張建良, "刑事强制措施" 中國人民公安大學出版社 2005