This research analyzed evaluation result of past indicator data closely and is to develop reasonable indicator that take environment change factor into account, therefor, Korea Highway Corporation acquires good evaluation grade, also in the future, Th...
This research analyzed evaluation result of past indicator data closely and is to develop reasonable indicator that take environment change factor into account, therefor, Korea Highway Corporation acquires good evaluation grade, also in the future, There were executed more systematic and deep analysis about these evaluation index items in this research, and drew following conclusion to develop and apply reasonable and rational evaluation index that reflect management circumstances of Korea Highway Corporation. First, 'sales amount versus sales expenses ratio', which is the index to measure efficiency not the growth of an entity, is suitable index for the real condition and specific charater of Korea Highway Corporation, in case of administrational fixed capital productivity. Second, in the case of depreciation, it is necessary to take fixed depreciation of 10 years under corperation tax law, or fixed depreciation of 30 years under the law of toll road. Third, for administrational fixed capital productivity, it is coincided with the purpose of maximizing the efficiency through the effort of reducing the operational cost, that the expenses related with deficit of certain highway lines are better to be separated and deducted from the index of operational productivity, the operational expenses and labor cost, to balance the evaluation. Fourth, in the long-term strategy, to take those matters into consideration, which are the endless increase of highway or reduce of highway traffic, the evaluation, is rather to be changed by the method, set of target (best target: 90%, lowest target: 120%), which reflects the average achievements of recent 5 years. Fifth, the evaluation index of traffic management by ?distribution of 5 years, current applied method, is rather to be changed by the method, set of target (best target: 90%, lowest target: 120%), which reflects the average achievements of recent 5 years. Sixth, it is a suggestion that quantity management expenses are better to be separated from the expenses related with deficit of certain highway lines and to deduct operating expense and labor cost of deficit of certain highway lines by each index item to balance the evaluation.