RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      독 · 소 파이프라인 가스협정과 독일문제 (die Deutsche Frage) = German-Soviet Pipeline and Gas Agreement and German Question (die Deutsche Frage)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104574991

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The Pipeline and gas agreement between FRG(Federal Republic of Germany) and Soviet in 1970 was one of the most important agreement in new ostpolitik. Pipeline and Gas agreement was the big business that built the foundation of the cooperation between FRG and Soviet, and was the model of following economic agreement.
      The purpose of this study is to analyze the economic elevating cooperative ties between FRG and Soviet, and through studying this, we can see interrelation between economic interests of two countries and German question. France and Italy kept this agreement in check and monitored FRG's trade with Eastern Europe. It is noteworthy that CSU like anticommunism party carried forward this business actively.
      FRG made used of this agreement as a means of promoting new Ostpolitik. In this study the writer noticed that the Pipe-gas agreement was signed keeping step with new Ostpolitik that was aimed coexistence with Soviet, examined coexistence through economic exchange and handling for german question in relation to economic exchange. The agreement accompanied with big business gathered momentum under the same goals that were economic benefits, coexistence and peace. Detente was already developed broadly and FRG jumped on the this bandwagon through new Ostpolitik. Through analyzing Pipe-gas Agreement in detail we can see practical approach for German question between the two countries, and detente that both countries promoted. through this understanding we can see also the agreement as a means of peaceful coexistence. Economic agreement intensified the division of Germany but, through this division and status quo, the institutional peace was realized. Moscow treaty was the good case that showed institutional peace of the both countries. Economic rapprochement and practical interest between two countries enabled to establish channels of communication and contact, although German question could not be improved, the inconvenience and damage caused by German question could be reduced. the Pipeline-Gas agreement was at the heart of eastern trade and new Ostpolitik.
      번역하기

      The Pipeline and gas agreement between FRG(Federal Republic of Germany) and Soviet in 1970 was one of the most important agreement in new ostpolitik. Pipeline and Gas agreement was the big business that built the foundation of the cooperation between ...

      The Pipeline and gas agreement between FRG(Federal Republic of Germany) and Soviet in 1970 was one of the most important agreement in new ostpolitik. Pipeline and Gas agreement was the big business that built the foundation of the cooperation between FRG and Soviet, and was the model of following economic agreement.
      The purpose of this study is to analyze the economic elevating cooperative ties between FRG and Soviet, and through studying this, we can see interrelation between economic interests of two countries and German question. France and Italy kept this agreement in check and monitored FRG's trade with Eastern Europe. It is noteworthy that CSU like anticommunism party carried forward this business actively.
      FRG made used of this agreement as a means of promoting new Ostpolitik. In this study the writer noticed that the Pipe-gas agreement was signed keeping step with new Ostpolitik that was aimed coexistence with Soviet, examined coexistence through economic exchange and handling for german question in relation to economic exchange. The agreement accompanied with big business gathered momentum under the same goals that were economic benefits, coexistence and peace. Detente was already developed broadly and FRG jumped on the this bandwagon through new Ostpolitik. Through analyzing Pipe-gas Agreement in detail we can see practical approach for German question between the two countries, and detente that both countries promoted. through this understanding we can see also the agreement as a means of peaceful coexistence. Economic agreement intensified the division of Germany but, through this division and status quo, the institutional peace was realized. Moscow treaty was the good case that showed institutional peace of the both countries. Economic rapprochement and practical interest between two countries enabled to establish channels of communication and contact, although German question could not be improved, the inconvenience and damage caused by German question could be reduced. the Pipeline-Gas agreement was at the heart of eastern trade and new Ostpolitik.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Karsten Rudolph, "Wirtschaftsdiplomatie im Kalten Krieg: Die Ostpolitik der westdeutschen Großindustrie 1945-1991" Frankfurt am Mein 295-, 2004

      2 Michael Kreile, "West Germany: The Dynamics of Expansion" 31 (31): 791-, 1977

      3 Robert W. Dean, "West German Trade with the East: the Political Dimension" New York 128-, 1974

      4 John Lewis Gaddis, "We Now Know. Rethinking Cold War History" Oxford 26-, 1997

      5 Angela Stent, "Wandel durch Handel?: Die politisch-wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Sowjetunion" Köln 1983

      6 Friedrich Christian Delius, "Transit Westberlin: Erlebnisse im Zwischenraum" Berlin 120-, 2000

      7 Alexander Dallin, "The Use of History: Understanding the Soviet Union and Russia" Lanham 131-, 2009

      8 Werner D. Lippert, "The Economic Diplomacy of Ostpolitik: Origins of Nato's Energy Dilemma" New York 2011

      9 Hans Kalt, "Stalins langer Schatten: das Scheiten des sowjetischen Modells" Köln 132-, 1994

      10 Janusz Józef Węc, "Sozialliberale Ostpolitik: Die FDP und der Warschauer Vertrag Die Haltung der FDP gegenüber den Verhandlungen mit Polen über den Warschauer Vertrag vom 7. Dezember 1970" Potsdam 5-, 2011

      1 Karsten Rudolph, "Wirtschaftsdiplomatie im Kalten Krieg: Die Ostpolitik der westdeutschen Großindustrie 1945-1991" Frankfurt am Mein 295-, 2004

      2 Michael Kreile, "West Germany: The Dynamics of Expansion" 31 (31): 791-, 1977

      3 Robert W. Dean, "West German Trade with the East: the Political Dimension" New York 128-, 1974

      4 John Lewis Gaddis, "We Now Know. Rethinking Cold War History" Oxford 26-, 1997

      5 Angela Stent, "Wandel durch Handel?: Die politisch-wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Sowjetunion" Köln 1983

      6 Friedrich Christian Delius, "Transit Westberlin: Erlebnisse im Zwischenraum" Berlin 120-, 2000

      7 Alexander Dallin, "The Use of History: Understanding the Soviet Union and Russia" Lanham 131-, 2009

      8 Werner D. Lippert, "The Economic Diplomacy of Ostpolitik: Origins of Nato's Energy Dilemma" New York 2011

      9 Hans Kalt, "Stalins langer Schatten: das Scheiten des sowjetischen Modells" Köln 132-, 1994

      10 Janusz Józef Węc, "Sozialliberale Ostpolitik: Die FDP und der Warschauer Vertrag Die Haltung der FDP gegenüber den Verhandlungen mit Polen über den Warschauer Vertrag vom 7. Dezember 1970" Potsdam 5-, 2011

      11 Bruce Parrott, "Sources of Russian Conduct Toward Regional Conflict, In Cooperative Security: Reducing Third World Wars" New York 104-, 1995

      12 Paul R. Bennett, "Russian Negotiating Strategy: Analytic Case Studies from SALT and START" New York 45-, 1997

      13 Jürgen Nötzold, "Politische Voraussetzungen der Wirschaftsbeziehungen zwischen West und Ost" 36 (36): 37-53, 1985

      14 Valentin Falin, "Politische Erinnerungen (München, 1993), pp. 55-56; Hans Dietrich Genscher, Erinnerungen" Berlin 98-99, 1995

      15 Michael Kreile, "Ostpolitik und Ökonomische Interessen Egbert, In Die Ostpolitik der Bundesrepublik: Triebkräfte, Wiederstände, Konsequenzen" Opladen 76-, 1974

      16 Axel Rückert, "Ostpolitik und Ostgeschäft" 27 : 73-, 1971

      17 Michael Kreile, "Osthandel und Ostpolitik" Baden-Baden 1978

      18 NARA, "Nixon Presidential Materials (NPM), NSC Country Files, box 694, folder 2, Memorandum of Conversation (Rumor, Ortona, Stabler)" 1969

      19 Randall E., "Newnahm, Deutsche Mark Diplomacy: Positive Economic Sanction in German-Russian Relations" University Park 2002

      20 Alfred E. Shultz, "Member of the Board of Directors of DEMAG" 2 (2): 6-, 1967

      21 Arnulf Baring, "Macht-Wechsel: Die Ära Brandt-Scheel" Stuttgart 234-235, 1982

      22 Alf Mintzel, "Geschichte der CSU: Ein Überblick" Opladen 259-, 1977

      23 Christoph Bluth, Braitan, "Germany, and Western Nuclear Strategy" Oxford 172-, 1995

      24 Kirsten Westphal, "Germany and the EU-Russia Energy Dialogue, In The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe's Future Energy Security" Aldershot 95-, 2008

      25 Angela Romano, "From Détente in Europe to European Détente: How the West Shaped the Helsinki CSCE" Brussels 74-, 2009

      26 Günter Schmid, "Entscheidung in Bonn: Die Entstehung der Ost- und Deutschlandpolitik 1969/1970" Köln 239-, 1979

      27 Thomas Kästner, "Energie in 60 Minuten: Ein Reiseführer durch die Gaswirtschaft" Wiesbaden 105-, 2011

      28 Dirk Kroegel, "Einen Anfnag finden!: Kurt Georg Kiesinger in der Außen- und Deutshchlandpolitik der Großen Koalition" München 292-, 1997

      29 Beverly Crawford, "Economic Vulnerability in International Relations: East-West Trade, Investment, and Finance" New York 173-, 1993

      30 Hanns-Dieter Jacobsen, "Die Ost-West- Wirtschaftsbeziehungen als deutsch-amerikanisches Problem" Baden-Baden 77-78, 1986

      31 Werner Bührer, "Die Adenauer-Ära: Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949-1963" München 307-308, 1993

      32 Gunter Hellmann, "Deutsche Außenpolitik: Eine Einführung" Wiesbaden 96-, 2006

      33 Manfred Pohl, "Deutsch-russisch/sowjetische Wirtschaftsbeziehungen 1850-1988" Mainz 151-, 1988

      34 Otto Wolff von Amerongen, "Der Weg nach Osten: Vierzig Jahre Brückenbau für die deutsche Wirtschaft" München 114-, 1992

      35 William A. Clark, "Crime and Punishment in Soviet Officialdom: Combating Corruption in the Political Elite 1965-1990" New York 149-, 1993

      36 Hélène Seppain, "Contrasting US and German Attitudes to Soviet Trade, 1917-91" Houndmills 303-, 1992

      37 Willy Brandt, Berliner Ausgabe, "Band 6: Ein Volk der guten Nachbarn. Außenund Deutschlandpolitik 1966-1974, Bearb. von Helga Grebing" Berlin 566-, 2005

      38 Vladislav M. Zubok, "A Failed Empire: The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev" Chapel Hill 204-, 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.46 0.46 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.35 0.28 0.811 0.58
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼