RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    SM-101외 12종의 항생물질에 대한 항균력 시험 = Antimicrobial Activities of SM-101 and 12 Other Drugs Against Clinical Isolates

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40027255

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    SM-101, SP-102, SA-103, SB-104, SC-105, and SD-106, Korean products, were tested for its antimicrobial effect I comparison with those of ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefotaxime, sulbactam, and piperacillin. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of total 286 clinical isolates were determined by microdilution broth method and all of antimicrobials were tested at concentration from 0.125 to 128 ㎍/ml.
    Ninety percent of coagulase-negative staphylococci were inhibited at 4 ㎍/ml of SB-104, SM-101 and SB-104 showed relatively lower MIC range against methicllin-susceptble Staphylococcus aureus. Ninety percent of ampicillin-susceptible E. coli were inhibited at 2 ㎍/ml of SP-102 and SC-105. Fifty percent of P. aeruginosa were inhibited at 8㎍/ml of SP-102 and SC-105. Compared to ampicillin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, and sulbactam, SM-101 and 5 other antimicrobials showed higher activities against Bacteroides spp, and SA-103 showed the lowest range of MIC against Bacteroides spp. Among 6 antimicrobial products, SD-106 showed the highest MIC range against all of clinical isolates.
    번역하기

    SM-101, SP-102, SA-103, SB-104, SC-105, and SD-106, Korean products, were tested for its antimicrobial effect I comparison with those of ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefotaxime, sulbactam, and piperacillin. Minimal inhibitory conce...

    SM-101, SP-102, SA-103, SB-104, SC-105, and SD-106, Korean products, were tested for its antimicrobial effect I comparison with those of ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefotaxime, sulbactam, and piperacillin. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of total 286 clinical isolates were determined by microdilution broth method and all of antimicrobials were tested at concentration from 0.125 to 128 ㎍/ml.
    Ninety percent of coagulase-negative staphylococci were inhibited at 4 ㎍/ml of SB-104, SM-101 and SB-104 showed relatively lower MIC range against methicllin-susceptble Staphylococcus aureus. Ninety percent of ampicillin-susceptible E. coli were inhibited at 2 ㎍/ml of SP-102 and SC-105. Fifty percent of P. aeruginosa were inhibited at 8㎍/ml of SP-102 and SC-105. Compared to ampicillin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, and sulbactam, SM-101 and 5 other antimicrobials showed higher activities against Bacteroides spp, and SA-103 showed the lowest range of MIC against Bacteroides spp. Among 6 antimicrobial products, SD-106 showed the highest MIC range against all of clinical isolates.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼