한글판 작업과제 몰입상태척도(Korean version of Flow State Scale for Occupational Task: K-FSSOT)의 타당도 및 신뢰도연구 = Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the Flow State Scale for Occupational Task

국문 초록 (Abstract)

목적 : 본 연구는 작업치료 활동에서 대상자의 몰입상태정도를 측정하는 한글판 작업과제 몰입상태척도(Korean version of Flow State Scale for Occupational Task: K-FSSOT)를 개발하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 한글판 작업과제 몰입상태척도 개발을 위해 체계적인 번안과정을 거쳐 타당도 및 신뢰도검증을 하였다. 타당도 검증은 작업치료사 10명의 내용타당도와 환자 20명의 문항이해도 조사를 통해CVI 값을 산출하였다. 신뢰도 검증은 환자 33명의 내적일치도 및 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 조사하였다. 결과 : 내용타당도의 문항별 I-CVI 값은 .90~1.00으로 나타났고, 전체 항목의 평균인 S-CVI 값은 .97로적절한 것으로 확인되었다. 신뢰도 검증 결과 전체 문항의 내적일치도 값은 .855로 높은 수준으로나타났으며, 검사-재검사 신뢰도 값은 .894(p<.01)로 높은 상관관계를 보임으로 높은 신뢰도가 확인되었다. 결론 : K-FSSOT가 대상자의 참여와 몰입을 고민하는 작업치료사에게 작업치료 활동을 수행하는 대상자의몰입상태정도를 측정하는데 유용한 도구로 활용되기를 기대한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective : This study aimed to develop a Korean version of the Flow State Scale for Occupational Task (K-FSSOT), to measure the level of a flow experience of a subject in occupational therapy activities. Methods : To develop a measure of K-FSSOT, validity and reliability were verified through a systematic development process. The validity was verified by calculating the content validity index (CVI) through the content validity of 10 occupational therapists and a question-and-answer survey of 20 patients. Reliability was verified by investigating the internal consistency and examination-re-test reliability of 33 patients. Results : The item-CVI for each question in the content feasibility study was .90 to 1.00, and the scale-CVI, which is the average of the whole item, was found to be appropriate at .97. The verification of reliability indicated that the intrinsic value of the entire question was high at .855, and the test-retest reliability value was high at .894 (p<.01), showing a high correlation, and very high reliability. Conclusion : K-FSSOT could be used as a useful tool to measure the level of a flow experience of the target in performing occupational therapy activities for occupational therapists concerned about the participation and flow experience of the target.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구 방법 Ⅲ. 연구 결과 Ⅳ. 고 찰 Ⅴ. 결 론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김지훈, "몰입을 활용한 기능적 작업치료가 뇌졸중 환자의 상지기능과 일상생활활동에 미치는 영향" 특수교육재활과학연구소 54 (54): 71-88, 2015

2 김지훈, "뇌졸중 환자를 위한 몰입기반 치료의 개발 및 효과성 연구" 특수교육재활과학연구소 55 (55): 451-469, 2016

3 Regmi, K., "Understanding the processes of translation and transliteration in qualitative research" 9 (9): 16-26, 2010

4 Koller, M., "Translation procedures for standardized quality of life questionnaires : The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC)approach" 43 (43): 1810-1820, 2007

5 Sperber, A. D., "Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research" 126 (126): 124-128, 2004

6 Martin, P. A., "The psychology of leisure : Research approaches to the study of leisure" 132 (132): 311-, 1975

7 Yoshida, K., "The flow state scale for occupational tasks : Development, reliability, and validity" 23 (23): 54-61, 2013

8 Lee, T. J., "The effect of flow experience on career attitude maturity and career decision efficacy" Hongik University 2003

9 Nakamura, J., "The concept of flow" 9 (9): 239-263, 2014

10 Mukaka, M. M., "Statistics corner : A guide to appropriate use of correlation in medical research" 24 (24): 69-71, 2012

11 임윤정, "Sensory Profile 평가도구의 국내적용을 위한 번역연구" 대한작업치료학회 15 (15): 25-42, 2007

12 Carli, M., "Optimal experience:Psychological studies of flow in consciousness" Cambridge University Press 288-318, 1988

13 Molineux, M., "Occupation for occupational therapists" Wiley 1-14, 2004

14 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1992:Development perspectives on motivation" University of Nebraska Press 57-97, 1993

15 Polit, D. F., "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations" 30 (30): 459-467, 2007

16 Yoshida, K., "Flow experience during attentional training improves cognitive functions in patients with traumatic brain injury : An exploratory case study" 24 (24): 81-87, 2014

17 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Flow : The psychology of optimal experience" 24 (24): 93-94, 1990

18 Lynn, M. R., "Determination and quantification of content validity" 35 (35): 382-385, 1986

19 Shulman, K. I., "Clock-drawing : Is it the ideal cognitive screening test" 15 (15): 548-561, 2000

20 Wright, J. J., "Challenge-skills and mindfulness : An exploration of the conundrum of flow process" 26 (26): 25-32, 2006

21 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Beyond boredom and anxiety:Experiencing flow in work and play" Jossey-Bass 2000