RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      中韩“无极太极”论辩之比较研究 = The Study about the Comparison of the Debate on "Wuji•Taiji" between the Scholars of China and the South Korea

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      中国宋代的朱陆“无极太极”论辩是韩国朝鲜时期晦忘“无极太极”论辩的理论背景,但两次论辩并不同。朱熹与陆九渊,虽都信奉孔孟儒学,但在整个思想体系的建构上,双方的观点尖锐对立,集中表现在是否承认“无极”的存在。李彦迪以朱熹的学术观点为根据,批判曹汉辅又只承认“无极”,以“而”字连接“无极”与“太极”,强调“无极”与“太极”之间的紧密关系。朱陆“无极太极”论辩,不仅为中国宋明理学的发展做出了贡献,而且影响到朱子学在韩国的本土化进程。而晦忘“无极太极”论辩,在韩国性理学史上的重要性不容忽视,对性理学思想的深入发展和性理学的独特理论风格的形成打下了理论基础。
      번역하기

      中国宋代的朱陆“无极太极”论辩是韩国朝鲜时期晦忘“无极太极”论辩的理论背景,但两次论辩并不同。朱熹与陆九渊,虽都信奉孔孟儒学,但在整个思想体系的建构上,双方的观点尖锐...

      中国宋代的朱陆“无极太极”论辩是韩国朝鲜时期晦忘“无极太极”论辩的理论背景,但两次论辩并不同。朱熹与陆九渊,虽都信奉孔孟儒学,但在整个思想体系的建构上,双方的观点尖锐对立,集中表现在是否承认“无极”的存在。李彦迪以朱熹的学术观点为根据,批判曹汉辅又只承认“无极”,以“而”字连接“无极”与“太极”,强调“无极”与“太极”之间的紧密关系。朱陆“无极太极”论辩,不仅为中国宋明理学的发展做出了贡献,而且影响到朱子学在韩国的本土化进程。而晦忘“无极太极”论辩,在韩国性理学史上的重要性不容忽视,对性理学思想的深入发展和性理学的独特理论风格的形成打下了理论基础。

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The debate between Zhu and Lu's theory on "Wuji•Taiji" in the Song Dynasty of China was the theoretical background of Hui and Wang's controversy on the same question during the Korean periods, but the two arguments were different. Zhu Xi(1130~1200) and Lu Jiuyuan(1139~1193), both of whom believe in Confucianism of Confucius and Mencius, had quite different ideas in the construction of the entire ideological system, which especially could be seen in the question about whether or not to recognize the existence of "Wuji". Based on Zhu Xi's views, Li Yandi(1491~1553) criticized Cao Hanfu(?~?) for only acknowledging "Wuji", advocating connecting "Wuji" and "Taiji" with the word "er" to emphasize the close relationship between "Wuji" and "Taiji". Zhu and Lu's debate on "Wuji•Taiji" not only made a great contribution to the development of Chinese Song and Ming dynasties, but also influenced the localization of Zhuzi' theory in the south Korea. And it also couldn't be ignored the important role Hui and Wang's controversy played in the history of Neo-Confucianism of the South Korea, which has laid a theoretical foundation for Neo-Confucianism on the deeper development and the formation of the unique theoretical style of it.
      번역하기

      The debate between Zhu and Lu's theory on "Wuji•Taiji" in the Song Dynasty of China was the theoretical background of Hui and Wang's controversy on the same question during the Korean periods, but the two arguments were different. Zhu Xi(1130~1200) ...

      The debate between Zhu and Lu's theory on "Wuji•Taiji" in the Song Dynasty of China was the theoretical background of Hui and Wang's controversy on the same question during the Korean periods, but the two arguments were different. Zhu Xi(1130~1200) and Lu Jiuyuan(1139~1193), both of whom believe in Confucianism of Confucius and Mencius, had quite different ideas in the construction of the entire ideological system, which especially could be seen in the question about whether or not to recognize the existence of "Wuji". Based on Zhu Xi's views, Li Yandi(1491~1553) criticized Cao Hanfu(?~?) for only acknowledging "Wuji", advocating connecting "Wuji" and "Taiji" with the word "er" to emphasize the close relationship between "Wuji" and "Taiji". Zhu and Lu's debate on "Wuji•Taiji" not only made a great contribution to the development of Chinese Song and Ming dynasties, but also influenced the localization of Zhuzi' theory in the south Korea. And it also couldn't be ignored the important role Hui and Wang's controversy played in the history of Neo-Confucianism of the South Korea, which has laid a theoretical foundation for Neo-Confucianism on the deeper development and the formation of the unique theoretical style of it.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장도규, "이언적의 태극론과 도덕론 일고" 한국사상문화학회 (53) : 7-32, 2010

      2 고성애, "이언적의 태극론" 철학연구회 (88) : 5-27, 2010

      3 李彦迪, "韩国文集丛刊 24" 民族文化促进 会 389-399, 1988

      4 张品端, "韩国儒学史上“无极太极”论辩——以李彦迪和曹汉辅为中 心" 122-128, 2018

      5 陆九渊, "象山先生全集卷36" 商务印书馆 1-28, 1935

      6 陆九渊, "象山先生全集 卷2" 商务印书馆 22-32, 1935

      7 洪军, "论韩国儒学史上的“无极太极”之辩——以李彦迪的“无极太 极”论为中心" 98-106, 2017

      8 Lee Donguk, "朱陆无极太极论争研究" 247-277, 2010

      9 顾春, "朱陆无极太极之辩新论" 56-66, 2002

      10 주광호, "朱熹와 陸九淵의 ‘無極太極’ 논쟁" 철학연구소 (36) : 475-508, 2008

      1 장도규, "이언적의 태극론과 도덕론 일고" 한국사상문화학회 (53) : 7-32, 2010

      2 고성애, "이언적의 태극론" 철학연구회 (88) : 5-27, 2010

      3 李彦迪, "韩国文集丛刊 24" 民族文化促进 会 389-399, 1988

      4 张品端, "韩国儒学史上“无极太极”论辩——以李彦迪和曹汉辅为中 心" 122-128, 2018

      5 陆九渊, "象山先生全集卷36" 商务印书馆 1-28, 1935

      6 陆九渊, "象山先生全集 卷2" 商务印书馆 22-32, 1935

      7 洪军, "论韩国儒学史上的“无极太极”之辩——以李彦迪的“无极太 极”论为中心" 98-106, 2017

      8 Lee Donguk, "朱陆无极太极论争研究" 247-277, 2010

      9 顾春, "朱陆无极太极之辩新论" 56-66, 2002

      10 주광호, "朱熹와 陸九淵의 ‘無極太極’ 논쟁" 철학연구소 (36) : 475-508, 2008

      11 姜敬林, "晦斋李彦迪的哲学思想研究" 成均馆大学 2008

      12 李志庆, "晦斋李彦迪的“太极问辩”研究" 163-200, 199

      13 朱熹, "晦庵先生朱文公文集(二)卷31" 上海古籍出版社、安徽教育出版社 1330-1378, 2010

      14 朱熹, "晦庵先生朱文公文集 (二)卷36" 上海古籍出版社、安徽教育出版社 1557-1601, 2010

      15 황갑연, "『易傳』의 '太極陰陽'에 대한 理學者와 心學者의 이해 방식 차이와 원인 -朱熹와 象山의 '無極과 太極 및 陰陽'에 관한 변론을 중심으로-" 퇴계학연구원 (127) : 91-132, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-02-27 학회명변경 영문명 : institute of korean studes -> Academia Koreana KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.57
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.56 0.61 1.133 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼