In order to discuss pro‐Japanese Chinese literature in the Manchurian area, the present study paid attention first to the logic of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity(王道樂土論)’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races(...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103969391
김영문 (충주대학교)
2009
Korean
Chinese Japanophile's Literature in Manzhou ; Logical structure ; the Realm of Peace and Prosperity ; Five Peoples' Harmony ; The Literature of Japanese Imperialism ; Japanese Colonial Manzhou ; Chinese Japanophile's Literature in Manzhou ; Logical structure ; the Realm of Peace and Prosperity ; Five Peoples' Harmony ; The Literature of Japanese Imperialism ; Japanese Colonial Manzhou
KCI등재
학술저널
191-222(32쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In order to discuss pro‐Japanese Chinese literature in the Manchurian area, the present study paid attention first to the logic of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity(王道樂土論)’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races(...
In order to discuss pro‐Japanese Chinese literature in the Manchurian area, the present study paid attention first to the logic of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity(王道樂土論)’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races(五族協和論)’, the mottos that the government of Manchukuo(滿洲國) put up from the outset of the state. The foundation of Manchukuo was promoted not by the voluntary will of the residents in the Manchurian area but by the invasive policy of Japanese imperialism, and thus the ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ insisted on by Manchukuo had to be overshadowed by the power of Japanese imperialism that was pursuing supremacy over Asia. Nevertheless, most of pro‐Japanese people in Manchukuo justified their pro‐Japanese logic based on ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity.’ It was because ‘the theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ wore a Confucian coat and thus the pro‐Japanese people could justify their being pro‐Japanese for the cause of Confucian royalty to the king and patriotism.
While ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ functioned as a national ideal on the foundation of the country in combination with emperor‐centered imperialism, ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ was logic for national integration proposed as social implementation of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity.’ In ‘The theory of harmony of the five races,’ ‘the five races(五族)’ meant the major peoples living in Manchukuo, which were Manchurians, Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans and Japanese. In addition, ‘harmony(協和)’ meant cooperation and peace among the peoples. The authorities of Japanese imperialism and Manchukuo spread the idea through the society arbitrarily and disguised the logic of imperialism shrewdly. Therefore, the logic to spread monarchism through ‘the Manchurian Concordia Association(滿洲協和會)’, to attain cooperation and peace among the races in Manchukuo, and then to take the harmony for the base of the promotion of people's will and the conveyance of the ruler's will to people was in fact nothing but a sophism to keep people ignorant and uncritical, submitting, complying and cooperating to monarchism and imperialism. In brief, ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ outwardly took the form of equality pursued by an independent country, but in reality, it was typical pro‐Japanese logic aiming to win over Manchurian residents.
‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ penetrated rapidly into pro‐Japanese literature in those days. In particular, the writers of the ‘Yiwenzhi group(藝文志派)’, which was a representative group of pro‐Japanese authors in Manchukuo, advocated ‘Write-Printism(寫印主義)’ and maintained that writers must commit themselves to writing and publication purposelessly. This may be the literary reflection of ‘The theory of the realm of peace and prosperity’ lacking criticism of realities and ‘The theory of harmony of the five races’ supporting blind cooperation and reconciliation.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 한수영, "친일문학의 재인식" 소명출판 2005
2 김재용, "친일문학의 내적 논리" 역락 2003
3 신정호, "중국 '친일문학' 연구의 시각과 쟁점(1)" 영남중국어문학회 (48) : 493-522, 2006
4 김재용, "재일본 및 재만주 친일문학의 논리" 역락 2004
5 송승석, "일제 말기 타이완 일본어문학 연구" 연세대 2004
6 김장선, "위만주국시기 조선인 문학과 중국인 문학의 비교 연구" 역락 2004
7 임성모, "만주국 협화회의 총력전 체제 구상 연구 ― ‘국민운동’ 노선의 모색과 그 성격" 연세대학교 1998
8 馮爲群, "談東北淪陷時期的文學期刊" 中國現代文學硏究會 1 : 1993
9 黃萬華, "藝文志派四大作家" 中國現代文學硏究會. 1 : 1993
10 儒丐, "福昭創業記, 東方國民文庫" 滿日文化協會 1939
1 한수영, "친일문학의 재인식" 소명출판 2005
2 김재용, "친일문학의 내적 논리" 역락 2003
3 신정호, "중국 '친일문학' 연구의 시각과 쟁점(1)" 영남중국어문학회 (48) : 493-522, 2006
4 김재용, "재일본 및 재만주 친일문학의 논리" 역락 2004
5 송승석, "일제 말기 타이완 일본어문학 연구" 연세대 2004
6 김장선, "위만주국시기 조선인 문학과 중국인 문학의 비교 연구" 역락 2004
7 임성모, "만주국 협화회의 총력전 체제 구상 연구 ― ‘국민운동’ 노선의 모색과 그 성격" 연세대학교 1998
8 馮爲群, "談東北淪陷時期的文學期刊" 中國現代文學硏究會 1 : 1993
9 黃萬華, "藝文志派四大作家" 中國現代文學硏究會. 1 : 1993
10 儒丐, "福昭創業記, 東方國民文庫" 滿日文化協會 1939
11 小川平吉, "王道覇道と皇道政治" 廣文堂書店 1935
12 鄭孝胥, "王道政治指導原理 孔敎新編釋義" 深川母子園出版部 1934
13 최정옥, "滿洲國 文學의 硏究" 고려대 2007
14 小松, "滿人作家小說集第二集ㆍ蒲公英" 三和書房 1940
15 古丁, "滿人作家小說集ㆍ原野" 三和書房 1939
16 爵靑, "歐陽家的人們" 國民畵報社 1945
17 "東北現代文學大系" 沈陽出版社 1996
18 古丁, "平沙" 中央公論社 1940
19 興亞協會, "在滿朝鮮人通信" 1939
20 佐藤知恭, "回鑾訓民詔書衍義" 民生部 1936
21 劉曉麗, "僞滿洲國時期附逆作品的表裏" 4 : 2006
22 김미정, "中日戰爭時期 周作人의 親日行爲에 對한 一考察" 韓國中國現代文學學會 (20) : 2001
23 "中國淪陷區文學大系" 廣西敎育出版社 2000
24 藝文書房, "『藝文志』(月刊), 新京: 1943. 11.-1944. 10"
25 藝文志事務會, "『藝文志』(半年刊), 新京: 1939. 6.-1940. 6"
26 劉曉麗, "≪藝文志≫ 雜誌與僞滿洲國時期的文學" 黑龍江大學 6 : 2005
27 鄭孝胥, "(滿州國)王道の片鱗" 1936
화해를 위한 두 진혼곡 ― 『색/계』와 『난징! 난징!』
제국일본의 화공(華工)과 식민당국의 화공정책 ― 식민지 조선과 타이완을 중심으로
전지구화의 기억과 미래, 번역의 정치와 예술의 윤리 ― 호미 바바 방한 강연 리뷰
“革命文学”论争中的茅盾 ― 1928年至“左联”成立前夕茅盾的“自述”和“辩解”
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
1999-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.36 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.37 | 0.34 | 0.589 | 0.43 |