RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      聖王 堯舜의 연구사 궤적: 역사의 경계에서 문화적 기억까지 = Research Trajectory of Sage-rulers Yao and Shun: From the Boundaries of History to Cultural Memory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109477033

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In pre-modem East Asian literature, the figure of the sage-king (聖王) occupies a singularly authoritative role as a model of governance. Among these figures, Yao and Shun stand out as frequent exemplars, yet questions surrounding their historicity have fueled a longstanding scholarly debate since the advent of modem historiography. In traditional contexts, Yao and Shun were viewed as historical sage-rulers, but with the rise of the early 20th-century ’’doubting antiquity” (疑古) school, they came to be regarded as figures that occupy an ambiguous space between myth and history, lacking clear historical substantiation.
      Influenced by this view, scholars in the West, Japan, and Korea have often approached Yao and Shun as mythic or legendary figures, or as elements of cultural memory, and have also explored how ancient texts employed the figure of the sage (聖人), including Yao and Shun, to convey deeper cultural and philosophical meanings. However, the mid-to-late 20th century saw a shift within Chinese academia, spurred by research on unearthed texts, toward efforts to substantiate the historical existence of Yao and Shun. Some interpretations have viewed Yao and Shun’s abdication of power as a reflection of political practices within tribal societies. Studies on the Records of the Grand Historian {Shiji), especially the ’’Annals of the Five Emperors(五帝本紀), have also been shaped by these perspectives. Since the 2000s, there has been an increasing trend of integrating archaeological findings with textual analysis in the study this chapter.
      This paper introduces and critically assesses the diverse perspectives on Yao and Shun’s narratives, including debates over le chronology of their stories. Ultimately, apart from a limited amber of studies, analyses of Yao, Shun, and related ancient Chinese sage narratives have largely been conducted piecemeal within individual texts, often preoccupied with the difficult question of their historical existence due to the absence of direct archaeological evidence. Moreover, ongoing debates over the compilation dates of lese texts have complicated attempts to reconstruct the evolution of Yao and Shun narratives throughout the pre-Qin period. A comprehensive study of the Yao, Shun, and sage king traditions, which occupy a central place in the pre-modem East Asian literary canon, is both timely and necessary.
      번역하기

      In pre-modem East Asian literature, the figure of the sage-king (聖王) occupies a singularly authoritative role as a model of governance. Among these figures, Yao and Shun stand out as frequent exemplars, yet questions surrounding their historicity ...

      In pre-modem East Asian literature, the figure of the sage-king (聖王) occupies a singularly authoritative role as a model of governance. Among these figures, Yao and Shun stand out as frequent exemplars, yet questions surrounding their historicity have fueled a longstanding scholarly debate since the advent of modem historiography. In traditional contexts, Yao and Shun were viewed as historical sage-rulers, but with the rise of the early 20th-century ’’doubting antiquity” (疑古) school, they came to be regarded as figures that occupy an ambiguous space between myth and history, lacking clear historical substantiation.
      Influenced by this view, scholars in the West, Japan, and Korea have often approached Yao and Shun as mythic or legendary figures, or as elements of cultural memory, and have also explored how ancient texts employed the figure of the sage (聖人), including Yao and Shun, to convey deeper cultural and philosophical meanings. However, the mid-to-late 20th century saw a shift within Chinese academia, spurred by research on unearthed texts, toward efforts to substantiate the historical existence of Yao and Shun. Some interpretations have viewed Yao and Shun’s abdication of power as a reflection of political practices within tribal societies. Studies on the Records of the Grand Historian {Shiji), especially the ’’Annals of the Five Emperors(五帝本紀), have also been shaped by these perspectives. Since the 2000s, there has been an increasing trend of integrating archaeological findings with textual analysis in the study this chapter.
      This paper introduces and critically assesses the diverse perspectives on Yao and Shun’s narratives, including debates over le chronology of their stories. Ultimately, apart from a limited amber of studies, analyses of Yao, Shun, and related ancient Chinese sage narratives have largely been conducted piecemeal within individual texts, often preoccupied with the difficult question of their historical existence due to the absence of direct archaeological evidence. Moreover, ongoing debates over the compilation dates of lese texts have complicated attempts to reconstruct the evolution of Yao and Shun narratives throughout the pre-Qin period. A comprehensive study of the Yao, Shun, and sage king traditions, which occupy a central place in the pre-modem East Asian literary canon, is both timely and necessary.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼