RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    土地利用規制와 土地公有化 方案에 관한 硏究

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T3544411

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 檀國大學校, 1991

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) : -- 檀國大學校 經營大學院 , 不動産學科 , '91년 8월

    • 발행연도

      1991

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      321 판사항(3)

    • DDC

      350.82326 판사항(19)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      107장 ; 26cm.

    • 소장기관
      • 가톨릭관동대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립목포대학교 도서관(도림캠퍼스) 소장기관정보
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 단국대학교 율곡기념도서관(천안) 소장기관정보
      • 단국대학교 퇴계기념도서관(중앙도서관) 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동양대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 신경주대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 한남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Land is the basic foundation of the state and provides its people vith the spaces for daily living and production activities.
    In the most of the modern welfare states, the development and preservation of the land space are the primary responsibilities of the state.
    The right of property of all citizens shall be guaranteed (constitution Para. 1 of Art. 23). However the property rights have been restricted by the laws of the land planning such as the Land Use and Manegement Law and the City Planning Law etc..
    These days, a nation or local government generalized the restriction of land use from the general viewpoint of urban and the land development.
    These gevernmental restrictions on private land property resulted in consideral property damages or disadvantages due to the legal inconsistency between the constitution and the subordinate position laws. Therefore, the methods to compensate or relief for damages have been intensively studied in light of the basic theory of laws.
    The concept and theoretical ground of the planning control of the living space has been written.
    The restrictions of land use on the ground of the administrative planning and the current actual status of the land use and its restrictions are also studied.
    Provided that the restrictions are not exceeding the scope of the social limitations, no compensation is required. However, the damages in some cases forcing sacrifices and exceeding the limitations are to be compensated. But, in fact, the compensation has not been implemented. Since there are no stipulated regulations or rules to the laws and ordinances. So the appropriate legislative enactment and the suitable administrative policy are required to enable the compensation.
    The compensation for the restriction of land use is different from the case of land expropriation. So the damages are not practically easy to determine the value and the scope of the compensations to make. Accordingly, the government measures to alleviate the damages are needed.
    According to the restrictions or controls of land use, the funds to compensate for the damages caused by the development Bay well be appropriated to the interest following the regional land development. This has been the prevailing practices in the advanced countries these days. It is rather desirable to nationalization the privately owned lands that are legally restricted within the green belts and the like as other nations are executing.
    As stated above, recently, the green belt zones in the urban area is threatened with the increasing development pressure caused by rapid urbanization and industrialization. The best alternative for this problem-solving is to establish the public ownership of the land property in the green belt areas. Therefore a widely acceptable method of obtaining the funds required for the public ownership of the private lands should be carefully worked out and carried out on the gradual basis considering the financial availability. The funds are to be raised from the development profits, the government's subsidy and issuing bonds.
    In conclusion, summarizing the study on the subject the transfer of the private ownership to the public should be considered, and the limitations and the various problem areas to be solved are poinded out in this study.
    번역하기

    The Land is the basic foundation of the state and provides its people vith the spaces for daily living and production activities. In the most of the modern welfare states, the development and preservation of the land space are the primary responsibil...

    The Land is the basic foundation of the state and provides its people vith the spaces for daily living and production activities.
    In the most of the modern welfare states, the development and preservation of the land space are the primary responsibilities of the state.
    The right of property of all citizens shall be guaranteed (constitution Para. 1 of Art. 23). However the property rights have been restricted by the laws of the land planning such as the Land Use and Manegement Law and the City Planning Law etc..
    These days, a nation or local government generalized the restriction of land use from the general viewpoint of urban and the land development.
    These gevernmental restrictions on private land property resulted in consideral property damages or disadvantages due to the legal inconsistency between the constitution and the subordinate position laws. Therefore, the methods to compensate or relief for damages have been intensively studied in light of the basic theory of laws.
    The concept and theoretical ground of the planning control of the living space has been written.
    The restrictions of land use on the ground of the administrative planning and the current actual status of the land use and its restrictions are also studied.
    Provided that the restrictions are not exceeding the scope of the social limitations, no compensation is required. However, the damages in some cases forcing sacrifices and exceeding the limitations are to be compensated. But, in fact, the compensation has not been implemented. Since there are no stipulated regulations or rules to the laws and ordinances. So the appropriate legislative enactment and the suitable administrative policy are required to enable the compensation.
    The compensation for the restriction of land use is different from the case of land expropriation. So the damages are not practically easy to determine the value and the scope of the compensations to make. Accordingly, the government measures to alleviate the damages are needed.
    According to the restrictions or controls of land use, the funds to compensate for the damages caused by the development Bay well be appropriated to the interest following the regional land development. This has been the prevailing practices in the advanced countries these days. It is rather desirable to nationalization the privately owned lands that are legally restricted within the green belts and the like as other nations are executing.
    As stated above, recently, the green belt zones in the urban area is threatened with the increasing development pressure caused by rapid urbanization and industrialization. The best alternative for this problem-solving is to establish the public ownership of the land property in the green belt areas. Therefore a widely acceptable method of obtaining the funds required for the public ownership of the private lands should be carefully worked out and carried out on the gradual basis considering the financial availability. The funds are to be raised from the development profits, the government's subsidy and issuing bonds.
    In conclusion, summarizing the study on the subject the transfer of the private ownership to the public should be considered, and the limitations and the various problem areas to be solved are poinded out in this study.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 目次 = ⅰ
    • 第 1 章 序論 = 1
    • 第 1 節 硏究의 目的 = 1
    • 第 2 節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
    • 第 2 章 土地利用規制에 관한 理論的 考察 = 5
    • 目次 = ⅰ
    • 第 1 章 序論 = 1
    • 第 1 節 硏究의 目的 = 1
    • 第 2 節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
    • 第 2 章 土地利用規制에 관한 理論的 考察 = 5
    • 第 1 節 土地利用規制의 必要性 = 5
    • Ⅰ. 土地利用規制의 必要性 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 土地利用規制의 根據 = 6
    • 1. 憲法上의 規定 = 6
    • 2. 法律上의 規定 = 7
    • Ⅲ. 우리나라의 土地利用計劃 및 規制의 沿革 = 9
    • 1. 日帝時代의 土地利用 = 9
    • 2. 解放以後의 土地利用 = 10
    • 3. 1970年代 以後의 土地利用 = 10
    • 第 2 節 土地利用의 計劃制限 = 11
    • Ⅰ. 計劃制限의 意義 = 11
    • 1. 計劃制限의 槪念 = 11
    • 2. 計劃制限과 生活空間規制行政 = 12
    • 3. 計劃制限과 行政計劃 = 13
    • 4. 計劃制限과 公用制限 = 15
    • Ⅱ. 計劃制限의 內容 = 17
    • 1. 一般的 制限 = 18
    • 2. 個別的 制限 = 20
    • Ⅲ. 計劃制限의 限界 = 34
    • 第 3 節 土地利用規制의 現況 = 35
    • Ⅰ. 土地利用現況 = 35
    • 1. 農耕地 = 36
    • 2. 山林地 = 38
    • 3. 工業用地 = 38
    • 4. 住居用地 = 39
    • 5. 公共用地 = 39
    • 6. 水面 其他 = 39
    • Ⅱ. 土地利用規制現況 = 40
    • 1. 都市計劃 樹立現況 = 40
    • 2. 國土利用計劃의 樹立現況 = 41
    • 3. 開發制限區域의 現況 = 43
    • 第 3 章 土地利用規制와 損失補償 = 45
    • 第 1 節 土地利用規制와 損失補償의 關係 = 46
    • Ⅰ. 損失補償의 實定法的 根據 = 46
    • 1. 學說 = 47
    • 2. 判例 = 49
    • 3. 結語 = 50
    • Ⅱ. 社會的 制約과 特別한 犧牲의 區別基準 = 51
    • 1. 形式的 基準設 = 51
    • 2. 實質的 基準設 = 52
    • 3. 折衷說 = 55
    • 4. 結語 = 55
    • 第 2 節 土地利用規制와 損失補償制度의 새로운 傾向 = 56
    • Ⅰ. 公用收用 法理의 새로운 動向 = 56
    • 1. 收用槪念의 擴大 = 56
    • 2. 公共性槪念의 擴大 = 57
    • Ⅱ. 收用類似의 侵害 = 58
    • 1. 槪念 = 58
    • 2. 土地利用規制와의 關係 = 59
    • Ⅲ. 受容的 損害 = 60
    • 第 3 節 土地利用規制와 損失補償 與否 = 61
    • Ⅰ. 計劃의 不適合으로 인한 損失補償 = 61
    • 1. 計劃의 不適合의 槪念 = 61
    • 2. 損失의 補償問題 = 62
    • Ⅱ. 計劃의 實施遲延의 인한 損失補償 = 63
    • 1. 計劃의 實施遲延의 槪念 = 63
    • 2. 損失의 補償問題 = 64
    • Ⅲ. 計劃의 變更?廢止로 인한 損失補償 = 65
    • 1. 計劃의 變更?廢止의 槪念 = 65
    • 2. 損失의 補償問題 = 65
    • Ⅳ. 市街化調整區域 指定으로 인한 損失補償 = 67
    • Ⅴ. 開發制限區域 指定으로 인한 損失補償 = 68
    • 第 4 節 地域利用規制에 따른 損失補償의 問題點 = 72
    • Ⅰ. 實定法上의 問題點 = 72
    • Ⅱ. 現實的인 問題點 = 73
    • 1. 開發損失補償 = 74
    • 2. 損失補償의 財源確保 = 75
    • Ⅲ. 問題解決의 새로운 動向 = 76
    • 第 4 章 開發制限區域內 土地公有化 方案 = 77
    • 第 1 節 土地公有化의 論理 = 77
    • Ⅰ. 土地公有化의 槪念 = 77
    • Ⅱ. 土地公有化의 合法性 = 79
    • 第 2 節 開發制限區域內 土地公有化의 必要性 = 80
    • 第 3 節 開發制限區域內 私有地 買入方案 = 83
    • Ⅰ. 私有地의 買入前提條件 = 84
    • Ⅱ. 私有地의 買入方式 = 85
    • 1. 地價補償證券에 의한 一時的 買入方式 = 86
    • 2. 私有權에 의한 部分的?段階的 買入方式 = 87
    • 3. 私有地의 買入價格 決定 = 89
    • 第 4 節 財源調達方案 = 91
    • Ⅰ. 國庫의 支援 = 91
    • Ⅱ. 開發利益의 還收金 = 92
    • Ⅲ. 公債의 發行 = 93
    • 第 5 章 結論 = 95
    • 參考文獻 = 98
    • ABSTRACT = 105
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼