RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    재건축 규제완화에 대한 토지공법적 검토 = Review of the land public law for deregulation of reconstruction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108490292

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the metropolitan area, where housing sites are absolutely scarce, reconstruction is practically the only means of supplying housing. However, those who understand reconstruction simply as a means of increasing property and think negatively or who think that they must catch up with soaring real estate prices strengthen safety inspections to prevent the reconstruction project from proceeding in the first place, try to reduce the supply of housing through reconstruction by the sale price ceiling system and reconstruction charge. Therefore, in order to promote reconstruction, it is reasonable to remove the so-called three major nails (safety diagnosis, sale price ceiling system, and reconstruction charge) that hinder reconstruction.
    First, there are ways to lower structural safety standards and exempt safety diagnosis for buildings built before 1988, but now it is time to consider abolishing safety diagnosis boldly to revitalize the reconstruction project.
    Next, the sale price ceiling system for private housing sites should be abolished as soon as possible, as there is no longer any reason to exist, such as instability in real estate prices and reverse discrimination.
    Lastly, although some of the problems with the reconstruction charge have been removed through 2022. 9. 29. countermeasure, unconstitutional elements still remain. Therefore, it is worth considering removing the unconstitutionality through law revision or abolishing it at this chance.
    번역하기

    In the metropolitan area, where housing sites are absolutely scarce, reconstruction is practically the only means of supplying housing. However, those who understand reconstruction simply as a means of increasing property and think negatively or who t...

    In the metropolitan area, where housing sites are absolutely scarce, reconstruction is practically the only means of supplying housing. However, those who understand reconstruction simply as a means of increasing property and think negatively or who think that they must catch up with soaring real estate prices strengthen safety inspections to prevent the reconstruction project from proceeding in the first place, try to reduce the supply of housing through reconstruction by the sale price ceiling system and reconstruction charge. Therefore, in order to promote reconstruction, it is reasonable to remove the so-called three major nails (safety diagnosis, sale price ceiling system, and reconstruction charge) that hinder reconstruction.
    First, there are ways to lower structural safety standards and exempt safety diagnosis for buildings built before 1988, but now it is time to consider abolishing safety diagnosis boldly to revitalize the reconstruction project.
    Next, the sale price ceiling system for private housing sites should be abolished as soon as possible, as there is no longer any reason to exist, such as instability in real estate prices and reverse discrimination.
    Lastly, although some of the problems with the reconstruction charge have been removed through 2022. 9. 29. countermeasure, unconstitutional elements still remain. Therefore, it is worth considering removing the unconstitutionality through law revision or abolishing it at this chance.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서울행정법원 실무연구회, "행정소송의 이론과 실무 Ⅰ" 사법발전재단 2021

    2 정회근, "재건축사업의 초과이익환수제에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 96 : 43-73, 2021

    3 홍성진, "재건축사업 및 가로주택정비사업에서의 공공사업시행방식 적용에 따른 법적 쟁점- 2・4대책에 따른 수용과 매도청구의 경계 문제 -" 한국토지공법학회 95 : 45-71, 2021

    4 김진수, "재건축부담금 제도의 문제점 실증 연구" 한국토지공법학회 82 : 67-91, 2018

    5 정회근, "재개발․재건축사업시행의 판단기준인 노후․불량건축물에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 100 : 99-116, 2022

    6 성중탁, "도시정비사업의 법적 쟁점과 해설" 집문당 2016

    7 배명호, "공공재건축사업에 대한 법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 93 : 89-113, 2021

    8 김종보, "건설법의 이해" 피데스 2018

    1 서울행정법원 실무연구회, "행정소송의 이론과 실무 Ⅰ" 사법발전재단 2021

    2 정회근, "재건축사업의 초과이익환수제에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 96 : 43-73, 2021

    3 홍성진, "재건축사업 및 가로주택정비사업에서의 공공사업시행방식 적용에 따른 법적 쟁점- 2・4대책에 따른 수용과 매도청구의 경계 문제 -" 한국토지공법학회 95 : 45-71, 2021

    4 김진수, "재건축부담금 제도의 문제점 실증 연구" 한국토지공법학회 82 : 67-91, 2018

    5 정회근, "재개발․재건축사업시행의 판단기준인 노후․불량건축물에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 100 : 99-116, 2022

    6 성중탁, "도시정비사업의 법적 쟁점과 해설" 집문당 2016

    7 배명호, "공공재건축사업에 대한 법적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 93 : 89-113, 2021

    8 김종보, "건설법의 이해" 피데스 2018

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼