RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    부동산 공시가격 현실화 정책과 주택가격대별 재산세 편차의 변화 = The Realization of Real Estate Assessed Values and Changes in Property Tax Variations by House Price Level 25

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110267068

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    With the inauguration of the new government in 2025, various discussions on the reform of the asset tax system have emerged, including arguments for the necessity of increasing real estate holding taxes. This study conducts an empirical analysis of changes in property tax variations in 2020, a period marked by the most recent comprehensive and structural attempt to increase real estate holding taxes. Specifically, it examines how the policy aimed at raising property taxes through the “Realization of Published Prices” affected property tax disparities, which serve as a measure of tax equity.
    Utilizing the Difference-in-Differences (DID) methodology based on the Panel Study of Public Finance provided by the Korea Institute of Public Finance, this study analyzes the impact of the realization policy on property tax variations across housing price levels. The results indicate that following the implementation of the policy, the variation in property taxes for low-to-mid-priced housing was significantly reduced compared to high-priced housing. In other words, the policy functioned to alleviate tax burden imbalances in relatively lower price brackets, demonstrating effects consistent with the government’s stated goal of enhancing equity in assessed values relative to market prices.
    These empirical findings show that while the realization policy contributed to improving horizontal equity in the low-to-mid-priced segment, it conversely increased tax disparities in the high-priced segment, thereby affecting vertical equity. This suggests that prior to the policy, published prices were calculated without sufficient consideration for balance or equity, likely due to the multi-layered and pluralistic process of real estate price assessment. Therefore, when adjusting real estate holding taxes, focus should be placed not merely on the increase or decrease itself, but on improving the balance of assessed values across properties. Furthermore, it is essential to synchronize assessment methods across different property types, such as multi-family and single-family houses. In particular, more sophisticated policy designs are required for owners of low-to-mid-priced housing who may have lower tax-paying capacity. This study distinguishes itself from existing literature by quantitatively verifying the impact of the realization policy on the property tax structure across all housing types, including single-family homes. Furthermore, while previous studies have focused on the gap between published prices and market values, this research provides more direct policy implications for the equity of the holding tax system by analyzing how the realization policy influenced property tax disparity as a key outcome variable.
    번역하기

    With the inauguration of the new government in 2025, various discussions on the reform of the asset tax system have emerged, including arguments for the necessity of increasing real estate holding taxes. This study conducts an empirical analysis of ch...

    With the inauguration of the new government in 2025, various discussions on the reform of the asset tax system have emerged, including arguments for the necessity of increasing real estate holding taxes. This study conducts an empirical analysis of changes in property tax variations in 2020, a period marked by the most recent comprehensive and structural attempt to increase real estate holding taxes. Specifically, it examines how the policy aimed at raising property taxes through the “Realization of Published Prices” affected property tax disparities, which serve as a measure of tax equity.
    Utilizing the Difference-in-Differences (DID) methodology based on the Panel Study of Public Finance provided by the Korea Institute of Public Finance, this study analyzes the impact of the realization policy on property tax variations across housing price levels. The results indicate that following the implementation of the policy, the variation in property taxes for low-to-mid-priced housing was significantly reduced compared to high-priced housing. In other words, the policy functioned to alleviate tax burden imbalances in relatively lower price brackets, demonstrating effects consistent with the government’s stated goal of enhancing equity in assessed values relative to market prices.
    These empirical findings show that while the realization policy contributed to improving horizontal equity in the low-to-mid-priced segment, it conversely increased tax disparities in the high-priced segment, thereby affecting vertical equity. This suggests that prior to the policy, published prices were calculated without sufficient consideration for balance or equity, likely due to the multi-layered and pluralistic process of real estate price assessment. Therefore, when adjusting real estate holding taxes, focus should be placed not merely on the increase or decrease itself, but on improving the balance of assessed values across properties. Furthermore, it is essential to synchronize assessment methods across different property types, such as multi-family and single-family houses. In particular, more sophisticated policy designs are required for owners of low-to-mid-priced housing who may have lower tax-paying capacity. This study distinguishes itself from existing literature by quantitatively verifying the impact of the realization policy on the property tax structure across all housing types, including single-family homes. Furthermore, while previous studies have focused on the gap between published prices and market values, this research provides more direct policy implications for the equity of the holding tax system by analyzing how the realization policy influenced property tax disparity as a key outcome variable.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼