RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      TAALES 프로그램을 활용하여 한국 대학생이 작성한 에세이에 나타난 어휘의 정교화 특성 비교 = The Relationship between Lexical Sophistication Features and English Proficiency for Korean College Students using TAALES Program

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107840728

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study investigates the relationship between lexical sophistication features and English proficiency for Korean college students. Essays from the ICNALE(International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English) corpus were analyzed, using TAALES program. In order to examine whether or not there are statistically significant differences in lexical sophistication features across three groups, MANOVA was conducted. Results showed that the lexical sophistication features were significantly affected by English proficiency level. Essays written by Korean students with different English proficiency levels can be differentiated in terms of various lexical sophistication features including content words frequency, content words familiarity, lexical decision mean reaction time function words, hypernymy verbs, word naming response time function words, age of acquisition content words.
      번역하기

      This study investigates the relationship between lexical sophistication features and English proficiency for Korean college students. Essays from the ICNALE(International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English) corpus were analyzed, using TAALES ...

      This study investigates the relationship between lexical sophistication features and English proficiency for Korean college students. Essays from the ICNALE(International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English) corpus were analyzed, using TAALES program. In order to examine whether or not there are statistically significant differences in lexical sophistication features across three groups, MANOVA was conducted. Results showed that the lexical sophistication features were significantly affected by English proficiency level. Essays written by Korean students with different English proficiency levels can be differentiated in terms of various lexical sophistication features including content words frequency, content words familiarity, lexical decision mean reaction time function words, hypernymy verbs, word naming response time function words, age of acquisition content words.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 전문기, "코메트릭스(Coh-Metrix)를 이용한 중학교 1학년 개정 영어 교과서의 코퍼스 언어학적 비교 분석" 팬코리아영어교육학회 21 (21): 265-292, 2009

      2 김정렬, "초중등 영어교육 연계성 문제: 영어교과서의 계열성을 중심으로" 언어교육원 50 (50): 161-184, 2014

      3 전문기, "자동화된 언어분석 프로그램을 활용한 중학교 영어교과서의 학년 간 연계성 분석" 현대영어교육학회 16 (16): 195-218, 2015

      4 송해성, "고등학교 영어 교과서 듣기 과업의학년별 연계성 연구" 한국영어어문교육학회 19 (19): 279-305, 2013

      5 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production" 16 : 307-322, 1995

      6 Yang, Byug-Hwa, "Understanding Multivariate Data Analysis" Communication Books 2006

      7 Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions" 4 : 139-155, 1995

      8 Kristopher Kyle, "The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing" Elsevier BV 34 : 12-24, 2016

      9 Coxhead, A., "The academic word list 10 years on: Research and teaching implications" 45 (45): 355-362, 2011

      10 Brown. D., "Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy" Pearson Longman 2010

      1 전문기, "코메트릭스(Coh-Metrix)를 이용한 중학교 1학년 개정 영어 교과서의 코퍼스 언어학적 비교 분석" 팬코리아영어교육학회 21 (21): 265-292, 2009

      2 김정렬, "초중등 영어교육 연계성 문제: 영어교과서의 계열성을 중심으로" 언어교육원 50 (50): 161-184, 2014

      3 전문기, "자동화된 언어분석 프로그램을 활용한 중학교 영어교과서의 학년 간 연계성 분석" 현대영어교육학회 16 (16): 195-218, 2015

      4 송해성, "고등학교 영어 교과서 듣기 과업의학년별 연계성 연구" 한국영어어문교육학회 19 (19): 279-305, 2013

      5 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production" 16 : 307-322, 1995

      6 Yang, Byug-Hwa, "Understanding Multivariate Data Analysis" Communication Books 2006

      7 Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions" 4 : 139-155, 1995

      8 Kristopher Kyle, "The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing" Elsevier BV 34 : 12-24, 2016

      9 Coxhead, A., "The academic word list 10 years on: Research and teaching implications" 45 (45): 355-362, 2011

      10 Brown. D., "Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy" Pearson Longman 2010

      11 Crossley, S. A., "Predicting second language writing proficiency: The role of cohesion, readability, and lexical difficulty" 35 : 115-135, 2012

      12 Guo, L., "Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study" 18 : 218-238, 2013

      13 Ellis, R., "Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings" 16 : 409-435, 1995

      14 Jung, Y., "Linguistic features in MELAB writing task performances" CaMLA 2013

      15 MINKYUNG KIM, "Lexical Sophistication as a Multidimensional Phenomenon: Relations to Second Language Lexical Proficiency, Development, and Writing Quality" Wiley 102 (102): 120-141, 2018

      16 Nation, P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" Cambridge University Press 2013

      17 Scott A. Crossley, "Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing" Elsevier BV 18 (18): 119-135, 2009

      18 정미경, "Coh-Metrix를 통한 한국인 EFL학습자와 영어 모국어 화자의 논설문 코퍼스에 나타난 언어적 특성 분석" 한국중원언어학회 (33) : 373-395, 2014

      19 Kyle, K., "Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and applications" 49 (49): 757-786, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼