인터넷 댓글조작과 형사책임

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to introspect again the role of the criminal law at a time when it is said that numerous criminal and legal discussions are needed to develop the so called reply manipulation case that is shaking the nations political history. The research method considered the literature and precedents discussed in the past, and discussed the issue of subculture abuse caused by the internet, which is a product of convenience and affluence that came with the Forth industrial revolution through criminal law. Through a computer program, a discussion was held on what penalties would be imposed on the criminal law for attempting to manipulate public opinion by manipulating the so-called number of comments or Reaction. Question of whether the criminal law should further emphasize the need for a discussion on the need for a method to strengthen the preventive functions of the criminal law and expand the scope of punishment in order to address new causes of risk that came with the development of science. Without reflecting on whether such as government-inspired demonstration would be possible in todays world that was in the public perception of the authoritarian government of the past, it is a problem to see that the political goals of a particular group can be achieved by manipulating comments or creating public opinion on the Internet. The duty of criminal law is to protect the interests of the law. The role of the criminal law should be maintained the self limiting as far as possible in cases of violation or danger of the law. Still, it is a problem that the role of the criminal justice system today is too aggressive and is seen as a top tool rather than a last resort for solving problems. he role of the internet will be expanded further in the Hyper Connected society. To solve these problems, we should look forward to a change in the priority of other laws and policies other than criminal law.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유인창, "사이버명예훼손행위와 형사법적 대응방안" 한국컴퓨터정보학회 17 (17): 177-183, 2012

2 최정일, "사이버명예훼손죄의 구성요건 분석 및 형사법적 규제 방안에 대한 小考" 법학연구소 23 (23): 207-232, 2015

3 Ko Kun-Ho, "The Judiciary of Permissible Danger" 3-5, 1990

4 Park, Sang-ki, "The Criminal Law" Park Young-sa 177-187, 2005

5 Jeong Shin-kyo, "Systematic status of risk allowed under criminal law" 28 : 251-266, 2007

6 Kwok Byung-Sun, "Regulatory Problems and Countermeasures on Cyber Defamation" Korean Law Association 23 : 374-376, 2006

7 Lee, Jae-Sang, "Introduction to Criminal Law" Park Young-sa 207-218, 2014

8 kang Gu jin, "Duties in obstruction of business" 26 (26): 23-28,

9 Lee Jung Hoon, "Criminal Legal Considerations on Online Advertising Attacks" 14 (14): 77-110, 2012

10 Park, Kwang-min, "Crime identity of artificial intelligence robot and attribution of criminal responsibility" 20 (20): 153-178, 2017

11 Lee Soo-jin, "A question of the validity of the obligation and its requirements" 54 (54): 81-104, 2013

12 Kim Jong Duk, "A Study on the Constitutional Constitution to Prevent the Work of Camouflage Employment" 47 : 151-170, 2012

13 "2017 Crime White Paper" Legal Training Institute 151-155, 2018