1989년 천안문 사건과 그 이후 -역사의 중첩과 트라우마의 재생산

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The 1989 Tiananmen incident is generally regarded as a liberal democratic movement resisting dictatorship. The interpretation gained further momentum as it was viewed as the anti-dictatorial democratic movements in East Asia, and the anti-socialist revolutions in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. However, if you take a closer look at the development of the movement and the aspects of the resistance, the Tiananmen incident was a hybridized social movement with the class struggle and the democratic socialist movement within the socialist system.
Meanwhile, the 1989 Tiananmen incident is regarded as a democratic movement strongly influenced by the West since its reform and opening up, and in stark contrast to this, the Cultural Revolution is viewed as a totalitarian madness in which a dictator Mao Zedong mobilized the people to regain his power. However, if you look at the Tiananmen incident in the context of the movement for resistance from the base layer that appeared in modern Chinese history intermittently, you can see that it overlaps with the Cultural Revolution in many aspects. In particular, Deng Xiaoping and other old party leaders had traumas in the Cultural Revolution at the time, so they saw the Tiananmen incident as a renaissance of the Cultural Revolution and strongly mobilized state violence to suppress it.
The armed suppression of the Tiananmen incident in 1989 reduced the power of the stratum social forces, and China has changed into a neoliberal regime with Chinese characteristics that combines authoritarian rule and marketization. In the process, inequality and materialism have led to another new social movement in China, but the Chinese Communist Party has again imposed a strong crackdown on them due to the Tiananmen Square trauma. It is worth noting how the newly formed resistance movement will evolve in this overlap of history.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가며
• 2. 천안문에 드리운 문화대혁명의 그림자
• 3. 저항과 분열
• 4. 쇼크 독트린: 중국 특색의 신자유주의의 기원
• 5. 천안문 트라우마: 2019년 홍콩 시위와 중국의 노학연대
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 모리 가즈코, "현대 중국정치―글로벌 강대국의 초상" 한울아카데미 2013

2 아리프 딜릭, "텐안문(天安門)을 잊어라, 중국인들의 감정을 상하게 해서 새로운 ‘신중국’과의 거래를 놓치고 싶지 않으니까!" 중국근현대사학회 (62) : 251-273, 2014

3 하남석, "지방 시위를 통해본 1989 천안문 사건과 그 함의" 중국학연구회 (91) : 209-239, 2020

4 백승욱, "중국문화대혁명과 정치의 아포리아: 중앙문혁소조장 천보다와 조반의 시대" 그린비 2012

5 하남석, "애도의 정치학 : 근현대 동아시아의 죽음과 기억" 길 2017

6 데이비드 하비, "신자유주의" 한울아카데미 2007

7 나오미 클라인, "쇼크 독트린―자본주의 재앙의 도래" 살림Biz 2008

8 차태근, "새로운 아시아를 상상한다" 창비 2003

9 모리스 마이스너, "마오의 중국과 그 이후" 이산 2004

10 안치영, "덩샤오핑 시대의 탄생: 중국의 역사재평가와 개혁" 창비 2013

11 안치영, "고뇌하는 중국" 길 2006

12 왕샤오밍, "가까이 살피고 멀리 바라보기―왕샤오밍 문화연구" 문화과학사 2014

13 香港公會敎育中心, "工人起來了 : 工人自治聯合會運動一九八九" 香港公會敎育中心出版 1990

14 趙鼎新, "國家·社會關係與八九北京學運" 中文大學出版社 2007

15 전리군(첸리췬), "『모택동 시대와 포스트 모택동 시대 1949~2009』 하권" 한울아카데미 2012

16 鄧小平, "『鄧小平文選』 第三券" 人民出版社 1993

17 Andrew G. Walder, "Workers in the Tiananmen Protests: The Politics of the Beijing Workers’ Autonomous Federation" (29) : 1993

18 Zhang Liang, "The Tiananmen Papers" Public Affairs 2001

19 Louisa Lim, "The People’s Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited" Oxford University Press 2014

20 Yiching Wu, "The Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis" Harvard University Press 2014

21 Wang Shaoguang, "Research in the Political Economy Vol 13" 1992

22 Au Loong Yu, "China’s Rise: Strength and Fragility" Merlin Press 2012

23 장윤미, "89운동과 독립노조:베이징 노동자자치연합회를 중심으로" 아태지역연구센터 36 (36): 107-156, 2012