RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Study of Alerter Strategy of Pragmatic Competence on Request in EFL College Learners

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104736553

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to investigate pragmatic competence on request for Korean college learners. 75 college students were divided into two groups by genders: male(39) and female(36). Six DCT items on request were provided for the students and asked to write down the answers in each situation. Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP) coding scheme (Blum-Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989) was used for written responses of request sequences. This study focused on the use of alerters in three speech units on request: alerters, head act, and supportive moves. Some strategies were heavily skewed to ‘attention getter’ and ‘title/role.’ A number of learners in both genders used ‘attention getter’ as their main strategies among eight alerters, and ‘title/role’ as a higher rate. They also made use of minor alerter strategies such as ‘surname,’ ‘first name,’ and ‘endearment term,’ though they showed somewhat different use in each gender. However, there was no occurrence in three alerters: ‘nickname,’ ‘offensive term,’ and ‘pronoun.’ Other alerter strategies were different depending on situations and genders. The results imply that students have drawback in the appropriate use of pragmatic abilities. Teachers in EFL classroom should teach various types of alerter strategies on request and reflect clear sociocultural factors in speech acts.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to investigate pragmatic competence on request for Korean college learners. 75 college students were divided into two groups by genders: male(39) and female(36). Six DCT items on request were provided for the students and ...

    The purpose of this study is to investigate pragmatic competence on request for Korean college learners. 75 college students were divided into two groups by genders: male(39) and female(36). Six DCT items on request were provided for the students and asked to write down the answers in each situation. Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP) coding scheme (Blum-Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989) was used for written responses of request sequences. This study focused on the use of alerters in three speech units on request: alerters, head act, and supportive moves. Some strategies were heavily skewed to ‘attention getter’ and ‘title/role.’ A number of learners in both genders used ‘attention getter’ as their main strategies among eight alerters, and ‘title/role’ as a higher rate. They also made use of minor alerter strategies such as ‘surname,’ ‘first name,’ and ‘endearment term,’ though they showed somewhat different use in each gender. However, there was no occurrence in three alerters: ‘nickname,’ ‘offensive term,’ and ‘pronoun.’ Other alerter strategies were different depending on situations and genders. The results imply that students have drawback in the appropriate use of pragmatic abilities. Teachers in EFL classroom should teach various types of alerter strategies on request and reflect clear sociocultural factors in speech acts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Kim, J., "“Could you calm down more?”: Requests and Korean ESL learners" 67-82, 1995

    2 Holmes, J., "Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman. In P. Lorenzo-Dus & N. Bou-Franch, 2003 Gender and politeness: Spanish and British undergraduates' perceptions of appropriate requests. In: Género, lenguaje y traducción, José Santaemilia (Ed.), Valencia: Universitat de Valencia/Dirección General de la Mujer, pp. 187-199. (ISBN 84-370-5730-2)"

    3 Blum-Kulka, S., "Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure" 8 : 165-180, 1986

    4 Takahashi, T., "The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English" 8 : 131-155, 1987

    5 Blum-Kulka, S., "The CCSARP coding manual, in: Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies" Ablex 273-294, 1989

    6 Stokoe, E. H., "Taking about gender. The conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse" 9 (9): 217-240, 2003

    7 Hassall, T., "Requests by Australian Learners of Indonesian. Unpublished doctoral thesis" Australian National University 1997

    8 Kasper, G., "Pragmatics in Language Teaching" Cambridge University Press 2001

    9 Takahashi, S., "Pragmatic transferability" 18 (18): 189-223, 1996

    10 Koike, D. A., "Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition: Speech acts in interlanguage" 73 : 79-89, 1989

    1 Kim, J., "“Could you calm down more?”: Requests and Korean ESL learners" 67-82, 1995

    2 Holmes, J., "Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman. In P. Lorenzo-Dus & N. Bou-Franch, 2003 Gender and politeness: Spanish and British undergraduates' perceptions of appropriate requests. In: Género, lenguaje y traducción, José Santaemilia (Ed.), Valencia: Universitat de Valencia/Dirección General de la Mujer, pp. 187-199. (ISBN 84-370-5730-2)"

    3 Blum-Kulka, S., "Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure" 8 : 165-180, 1986

    4 Takahashi, T., "The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English" 8 : 131-155, 1987

    5 Blum-Kulka, S., "The CCSARP coding manual, in: Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies" Ablex 273-294, 1989

    6 Stokoe, E. H., "Taking about gender. The conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse" 9 (9): 217-240, 2003

    7 Hassall, T., "Requests by Australian Learners of Indonesian. Unpublished doctoral thesis" Australian National University 1997

    8 Kasper, G., "Pragmatics in Language Teaching" Cambridge University Press 2001

    9 Takahashi, S., "Pragmatic transferability" 18 (18): 189-223, 1996

    10 Koike, D. A., "Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition: Speech acts in interlanguage" 73 : 79-89, 1989

    11 Takahashi. T., "Pragmatic Transferability of L1 Indirect Request Strategies Perceived by Japanese Learners of English" University of Hawaii at Manoa 1995

    12 Blum-Kulka, S., "Learning to say what you mean in a second language: A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language" 3 (3): 29-59, 1982

    13 Blum-Kulka, S., "Interpreting and performing speech acts in a second language and cross-cultural study of Hebrew and English, in: Sociolinguistics and language acquisition" Newbury House 36-55, 1983

    14 Faerch, C., "Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization, in: Crosscultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies" Ablex 221-247, 1989

    15 House, J., "Interlanguage pragmatics: Requesting in a foreign language, ㅑㅜ: Perspectives on language in performance" Narr 1250-1288, 1987

    16 Lorenzo-Dus, N., "Gender and politeness: Spanish and British undergraduates' perceptions of appropriate requests. In: Género, lenguaje y traducción, José Santaemilia (Ed.), Valencia: Universitat de Valencia/Dirección General de la Mujer, pp. 187-199. (ISBN 84-370-5730-2)"

    17 Suh, J., "ESL Korean learners' use of external and internal modifications in request realizations"

    18 House, J., "Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a second language" 18 : 225-252, 1996

    19 Takahashi, S., "Cross-linguistic Influence in Indirectness: The Case of English Directives Performed by Native Japanese Speakers. Unpublished manuscript. Department of English as a Second Language, University of Hawaii at Manoa. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. D. 370-439)"

    20 Rose, K., "An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development" 22 : 27-67, 2000

    21 Shinn, H., "A survey of sociolinguistic studies in Korea" 82 : 7-23, 1990

    22 심재황, "A Study of Supportive Moves on Request for Korean EFL Students" 21세기영어영문학회 21 (21): 207-229, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.76 0.75 1.472 0.11
    더보기
    해외이동버튼