RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Extensive Reading Assessments in Reading Classes in General English Programs at University Levels

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104736552

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study has explored how English reading assessments in general English programs are designed and managed, and also explores ideas of implementing an extensive reading approach in classes. For the analysis, the study employs twenty eight instructors teaching readings in general English programs at universities. In the data collection procedure, questionnaires, test analysis, and in-depth interview methods are used. The findings indicate that, although some instructors understand the role of extensive reading, most of the reading tests used in general English reading programs focus on an intensive reading approach, partly due to class sizes and also to practicality matters. The study presents the idea of using online communities and assessments in implementing extensive reading classes in practice.
    번역하기

    This study has explored how English reading assessments in general English programs are designed and managed, and also explores ideas of implementing an extensive reading approach in classes. For the analysis, the study employs twenty eight instructor...

    This study has explored how English reading assessments in general English programs are designed and managed, and also explores ideas of implementing an extensive reading approach in classes. For the analysis, the study employs twenty eight instructors teaching readings in general English programs at universities. In the data collection procedure, questionnaires, test analysis, and in-depth interview methods are used. The findings indicate that, although some instructors understand the role of extensive reading, most of the reading tests used in general English reading programs focus on an intensive reading approach, partly due to class sizes and also to practicality matters. The study presents the idea of using online communities and assessments in implementing extensive reading classes in practice.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김은정, "대학 교양영어 시험문제 출제양상" 한국영어교육학회 60 (60): 267-283, 2005

    2 Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough" 50 : 158-164, 1993

    3 Elley, W., "The impact of reading on second language learning" 19 : 53-67, 1983

    4 Krashen, S. D., "The comprehension hypothesis: Recent evidence" 51 : 17-29, 1997

    5 Nuttall, C., "Teaching reading skills in a foreign language" Heinemann 1982

    6 North, B., "Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales" 15 (15): 217-262, 1998

    7 Carver, R., "Reading rate: A review of research and theory" Academic Press 1990

    8 Oppenheim, A. N., "Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement" PsychoBable Books 1997

    9 Kim, C. B., "Proposals for testing freshman English reading" 33-82, 1988

    10 Krashen, S. D., "Principles and practice in second language acquisition" Pergamon Press 1982

    1 김은정, "대학 교양영어 시험문제 출제양상" 한국영어교육학회 60 (60): 267-283, 2005

    2 Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough" 50 : 158-164, 1993

    3 Elley, W., "The impact of reading on second language learning" 19 : 53-67, 1983

    4 Krashen, S. D., "The comprehension hypothesis: Recent evidence" 51 : 17-29, 1997

    5 Nuttall, C., "Teaching reading skills in a foreign language" Heinemann 1982

    6 North, B., "Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales" 15 (15): 217-262, 1998

    7 Carver, R., "Reading rate: A review of research and theory" Academic Press 1990

    8 Oppenheim, A. N., "Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement" PsychoBable Books 1997

    9 Kim, C. B., "Proposals for testing freshman English reading" 33-82, 1988

    10 Krashen, S. D., "Principles and practice in second language acquisition" Pergamon Press 1982

    11 Swain, M., "Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks" 58 : 44-63, 2001

    12 Hill, D., "Graded readers in English" 62 (62): 184-204, 2008

    13 Warning, R., "Graded and extensive reading: Questions and answers"

    14 White, J., "Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study, in: Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 85-113, 1998

    15 Krashen, S. D., "Free vocabulary reading: New research, applications, and controversies" Regional Language Center 19-21, 2004

    16 Mason, B., "Extensive reading in English as a foreign language" 25 (25): 91-102, 1997

    17 Yamashita, J., "Extensive reading and development of different aspects of L2 proficiency" 36 : 661-672, 2008

    18 Carrell, P. L., "Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting" 16 : 47-60, 1997

    19 Swain, M., "Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development, in: Input in second language acquisition" Newbury House 235-256, 1985

    20 Merriam, S. B., "Case study research in education: A qualitative approach" Jossey Bass 1988

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.76 0.75 1.472 0.11
    더보기
    해외이동버튼