RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    메이지 이후 일본어 문법 용어의 성립과 품사분류표 = Formation of Grammatical Terms of Japanese Language after the Meiji Era and Part of Speech Classification Table

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101520936

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study outlined the part of speech classification in modern Japanese and dealt with the development of the part of speech classification table in current form. The current part of speech classification table of Japanese language is based on the part of speech classification table of Shinkichi Hashimoto. The part of speech classification table of Hashimoto can be generally divided into three parts; (A) the part to be cross-classified by the conflict of use and non-use such as self-reliance and accessories (Independent / included in Hashimoto’s table), (B) the part to be classified by function such as the subject and predicate and predicate-modifier, and (C) the part that indicates the part of speech such as a noun or a verb. (A) reflects the grammatical view of traditional Japanology, (B) the clause of the relationship of Hashimoto, and (C) the part of speech after Fumihiko Otsuki. The main text of the study examined how the contrasting concept used in (A) was brought from Chinese grammar into Japanese grammar and established as the grammatical concept of the Japanese language and how the eclecticism between Western grammar and Japanese grammar as well as the deviation from it took place regarding (C). This study went on to explain that the plan to correct the deviation of eclecticism emerged in the middle of the 20th year in the MeijiEra to form the part of speech classification table. The following shows the summary of each chapter. First, in “1. The introduction and modification of the terms from Chinese grammar to Japanese grammar”, it explained that concepts used to define the part of speech in Japanese grammar include ”詞/辭”, “體/用”, and “Conjugation”, that the contrasting concepts such as “True/False”, “Dynamic/Static”, and “Death/Life” in Chinese grammar were accepted after they were redefined through the scholars of Chinese classics during the Edo period, that the part of speech in traditional Japanese grammar had been generally divided into three categories such as 「Nouns / Verbs and Adverbs / Postpositions and Auxiliary Verbs」, and that the cross classification such as (A) would have not been used in traditional Japanese grammar to identify the part of speech. Second, in「2. Adaptation to Western grammar through English grammar」, it reviewed the definition of postpositions, auxiliary verbs, and exclamations centering on the Western grammar in the beginning of the Meji Era. It went on to explain that the postposition defined based on the proposition in English grammar expanded from whose that included case markers and some auxiliary postpositions to those that also included some connective postpositions such as「 て」and「つつ」, however, did not include ending propositions at the end of the sentence, that the auxiliary verb which was defined based on the auxiliary verb in English grammar includes the ending propositions such as 「ばや」 and 「なむ 」, that the exclamations included the ending propositions that are not used independently such as 「よ」 and 「な」, and that even Fumihiko Otsuki who pursued the eclecticism with traditional Japanese grammar also manifested the deviation of eclecticism in 「Grammar Guide」(1890). In 「3. Establishment of the Part of Speech Classification Table」, it explains that Otsuki’s definition of the part of speech (1890) is gradually propagated and that Otsuki’s “eclecticism” requires theoretical adjustment between Western grammar and traditional Japanese grammar. The grammar in the 1890’s can be considered to have accepted Otsuki’s part of speech classification which became the standard while promoted the theoretical coherence between Western grammar and traditional grammar. As a method to achieve coherence, the contrast in “independence / accessory” and “non-use/use” in the entire word was cross-classified to resolve “unvaried auxiliary verb” and “non-independent exclamation.” It also clearly explained the principle of the current part of speech classification table applying the cross-classification and that it was developed by presenting all parts of speech of Otsuki.
    번역하기

    This study outlined the part of speech classification in modern Japanese and dealt with the development of the part of speech classification table in current form. The current part of speech classification table of Japanese language is based on the pa...

    This study outlined the part of speech classification in modern Japanese and dealt with the development of the part of speech classification table in current form. The current part of speech classification table of Japanese language is based on the part of speech classification table of Shinkichi Hashimoto. The part of speech classification table of Hashimoto can be generally divided into three parts; (A) the part to be cross-classified by the conflict of use and non-use such as self-reliance and accessories (Independent / included in Hashimoto’s table), (B) the part to be classified by function such as the subject and predicate and predicate-modifier, and (C) the part that indicates the part of speech such as a noun or a verb. (A) reflects the grammatical view of traditional Japanology, (B) the clause of the relationship of Hashimoto, and (C) the part of speech after Fumihiko Otsuki. The main text of the study examined how the contrasting concept used in (A) was brought from Chinese grammar into Japanese grammar and established as the grammatical concept of the Japanese language and how the eclecticism between Western grammar and Japanese grammar as well as the deviation from it took place regarding (C). This study went on to explain that the plan to correct the deviation of eclecticism emerged in the middle of the 20th year in the MeijiEra to form the part of speech classification table. The following shows the summary of each chapter. First, in “1. The introduction and modification of the terms from Chinese grammar to Japanese grammar”, it explained that concepts used to define the part of speech in Japanese grammar include ”詞/辭”, “體/用”, and “Conjugation”, that the contrasting concepts such as “True/False”, “Dynamic/Static”, and “Death/Life” in Chinese grammar were accepted after they were redefined through the scholars of Chinese classics during the Edo period, that the part of speech in traditional Japanese grammar had been generally divided into three categories such as 「Nouns / Verbs and Adverbs / Postpositions and Auxiliary Verbs」, and that the cross classification such as (A) would have not been used in traditional Japanese grammar to identify the part of speech. Second, in「2. Adaptation to Western grammar through English grammar」, it reviewed the definition of postpositions, auxiliary verbs, and exclamations centering on the Western grammar in the beginning of the Meji Era. It went on to explain that the postposition defined based on the proposition in English grammar expanded from whose that included case markers and some auxiliary postpositions to those that also included some connective postpositions such as「 て」and「つつ」, however, did not include ending propositions at the end of the sentence, that the auxiliary verb which was defined based on the auxiliary verb in English grammar includes the ending propositions such as 「ばや」 and 「なむ 」, that the exclamations included the ending propositions that are not used independently such as 「よ」 and 「な」, and that even Fumihiko Otsuki who pursued the eclecticism with traditional Japanese grammar also manifested the deviation of eclecticism in 「Grammar Guide」(1890). In 「3. Establishment of the Part of Speech Classification Table」, it explains that Otsuki’s definition of the part of speech (1890) is gradually propagated and that Otsuki’s “eclecticism” requires theoretical adjustment between Western grammar and traditional Japanese grammar. The grammar in the 1890’s can be considered to have accepted Otsuki’s part of speech classification which became the standard while promoted the theoretical coherence between Western grammar and traditional grammar. As a method to achieve coherence, the contrast in “independence / accessory” and “non-use/use” in the entire word was cross-classified to resolve “unvaried auxiliary verb” and “non-independent exclamation.” It also clearly explained the principle of the current part of speech classification table applying the cross-classification and that it was developed by presenting all parts of speech of Otsuki.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼