RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중국 감찰법상 유치 제도에 대한 소고- 피유치자의 인권 보호를 위한 문제점과 개선방안을 중심으로 - = A Study on the Detention Measures Stipulated in China's Supervision Law- Focusing on the Problems Arising from the Protection of Detainees' Human Rights and on the Corresponding Improvement Plan -

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    On March 20, 2018, the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress of China voted to adopt Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Supervision Law”), which means that the detention system has become a legitimate investigative tool for supervisory organs to restrict personal freedom in execution of duty. As a new mandatorily investigative tool and an important law-based method, detention measures assist supervisory organs in investigation and play a positive role in anti-corruption campaign.
    The Supervision Law stipulates the supervision actions of supervisory organs and supervisory personnel, the basic rights of the investigated persons, and the right relief of the improper detention system. However, the specific reverse applications of the detention system are not explicitly stipulated. Furthermore, as the Supervisory Law has been formally enacted and implemented for only two years, there are many problems arising from the implementation of the detention measures. I believe it is necessary to improve the legislative and judicial practice in the future.
    Through an analysis on the detention system stipulated in China’s Supervisory Law, this paper will identify the problems thereof, particularly concerning the protection of detainees’ human rights, and emphatically discuss the corresponding improvement plan in the future.
    번역하기

    On March 20, 2018, the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress of China voted to adopt Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Supervision Law”), which means that the detention system ha...

    On March 20, 2018, the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress of China voted to adopt Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Supervision Law”), which means that the detention system has become a legitimate investigative tool for supervisory organs to restrict personal freedom in execution of duty. As a new mandatorily investigative tool and an important law-based method, detention measures assist supervisory organs in investigation and play a positive role in anti-corruption campaign.
    The Supervision Law stipulates the supervision actions of supervisory organs and supervisory personnel, the basic rights of the investigated persons, and the right relief of the improper detention system. However, the specific reverse applications of the detention system are not explicitly stipulated. Furthermore, as the Supervisory Law has been formally enacted and implemented for only two years, there are many problems arising from the implementation of the detention measures. I believe it is necessary to improve the legislative and judicial practice in the future.
    Through an analysis on the detention system stipulated in China’s Supervisory Law, this paper will identify the problems thereof, particularly concerning the protection of detainees’ human rights, and emphatically discuss the corresponding improvement plan in the future.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 陈瑞华, "论监察委员会的调查权" 2018

    2 张异, "论留置措施的规范运用——以≪国家监察法≫ 为视角" 2018

    3 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察调查程序若干问题研究" 2018

    4 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察证据若干问题研究" 2018

    5 胡铭, "职务犯罪留置措施衔接刑事诉讼的基本逻辑" 2019

    6 朱玉玲, "监察调查中被调查人权利保障探析" 2020

    7 妥占荣, "监察留置中被留置人员权利保障问题研究" 2019

    8 马怀德, "监察法:新时代党和国家自我监督的重要规范" 紫光阁 2018

    9 闫康, "监察机关留置措施的规制问题研究" 2019

    10 王晓, "监察委员会的留置措施论要" 2017

    1 陈瑞华, "论监察委员会的调查权" 2018

    2 张异, "论留置措施的规范运用——以≪国家监察法≫ 为视角" 2018

    3 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察调查程序若干问题研究" 2018

    4 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察证据若干问题研究" 2018

    5 胡铭, "职务犯罪留置措施衔接刑事诉讼的基本逻辑" 2019

    6 朱玉玲, "监察调查中被调查人权利保障探析" 2020

    7 妥占荣, "监察留置中被留置人员权利保障问题研究" 2019

    8 马怀德, "监察法:新时代党和国家自我监督的重要规范" 紫光阁 2018

    9 闫康, "监察机关留置措施的规制问题研究" 2019

    10 王晓, "监察委员会的留置措施论要" 2017

    11 谭世贵, "监察体制改革中的留置措施:由来、性质及完善" 2018

    12 张咏涛, "留置措施的基本内涵与规范运行" 2018

    13 尹维达, "留置措施初探" 2017

    14 任康廷, "法治视野下留置措施研究" 2017

    15 刘艳红, "法治反腐视域下国家监察体制改革的新路径" 2018

    16 陈光中, "我国监察体制改革若干问题思考" 2017

    17 刘飞, "国家监察法(草案)为何不提倡律师过早介入初期调查[EB/OL]"

    18 马怀德, "国家监察体制改革的重要意义和主要任务" 2016

    19 陈光中, "关于我国监察体制改革的几点看法" 2017

    20 樊崇义, "全面构建刑诉法与监察法的衔接机制" 2018

    21 李龙, "全面推进依法治国视域下的人权保障" 2015

    22 马怀德, "中华人民共和国监察法理解和适用" 中国法制出版社 2018

    23 배기석, "「변호사비밀유지의무」의 완화 경향에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 51 (51): 31-53, 2010

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.56 0.56 0.72
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.7 0.866 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼