On March 20, 2018, the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress of China voted to adopt Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Supervision Law”), which means that the detention system ha...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107019892
2020
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
265-286(22쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
On March 20, 2018, the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress of China voted to adopt Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Supervision Law”), which means that the detention system ha...
On March 20, 2018, the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress of China voted to adopt Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Supervision Law”), which means that the detention system has become a legitimate investigative tool for supervisory organs to restrict personal freedom in execution of duty. As a new mandatorily investigative tool and an important law-based method, detention measures assist supervisory organs in investigation and play a positive role in anti-corruption campaign.
The Supervision Law stipulates the supervision actions of supervisory organs and supervisory personnel, the basic rights of the investigated persons, and the right relief of the improper detention system. However, the specific reverse applications of the detention system are not explicitly stipulated. Furthermore, as the Supervisory Law has been formally enacted and implemented for only two years, there are many problems arising from the implementation of the detention measures. I believe it is necessary to improve the legislative and judicial practice in the future.
Through an analysis on the detention system stipulated in China’s Supervisory Law, this paper will identify the problems thereof, particularly concerning the protection of detainees’ human rights, and emphatically discuss the corresponding improvement plan in the future.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 陈瑞华, "论监察委员会的调查权" 2018
2 张异, "论留置措施的规范运用——以≪国家监察法≫ 为视角" 2018
3 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察调查程序若干问题研究" 2018
4 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察证据若干问题研究" 2018
5 胡铭, "职务犯罪留置措施衔接刑事诉讼的基本逻辑" 2019
6 朱玉玲, "监察调查中被调查人权利保障探析" 2020
7 妥占荣, "监察留置中被留置人员权利保障问题研究" 2019
8 马怀德, "监察法:新时代党和国家自我监督的重要规范" 紫光阁 2018
9 闫康, "监察机关留置措施的规制问题研究" 2019
10 王晓, "监察委员会的留置措施论要" 2017
1 陈瑞华, "论监察委员会的调查权" 2018
2 张异, "论留置措施的规范运用——以≪国家监察法≫ 为视角" 2018
3 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察调查程序若干问题研究" 2018
4 陈卫东, "职务犯罪监察证据若干问题研究" 2018
5 胡铭, "职务犯罪留置措施衔接刑事诉讼的基本逻辑" 2019
6 朱玉玲, "监察调查中被调查人权利保障探析" 2020
7 妥占荣, "监察留置中被留置人员权利保障问题研究" 2019
8 马怀德, "监察法:新时代党和国家自我监督的重要规范" 紫光阁 2018
9 闫康, "监察机关留置措施的规制问题研究" 2019
10 王晓, "监察委员会的留置措施论要" 2017
11 谭世贵, "监察体制改革中的留置措施:由来、性质及完善" 2018
12 张咏涛, "留置措施的基本内涵与规范运行" 2018
13 尹维达, "留置措施初探" 2017
14 任康廷, "法治视野下留置措施研究" 2017
15 刘艳红, "法治反腐视域下国家监察体制改革的新路径" 2018
16 陈光中, "我国监察体制改革若干问题思考" 2017
17 刘飞, "国家监察法(草案)为何不提倡律师过早介入初期调查[EB/OL]"
18 马怀德, "国家监察体制改革的重要意义和主要任务" 2016
19 陈光中, "关于我国监察体制改革的几点看法" 2017
20 樊崇义, "全面构建刑诉法与监察法的衔接机制" 2018
21 李龙, "全面推进依法治国视域下的人权保障" 2015
22 马怀德, "中华人民共和国监察法理解和适用" 中国法制出版社 2018
23 배기석, "「변호사비밀유지의무」의 완화 경향에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 51 (51): 31-53, 2010
국민건강보험법 요양급여비용 지급보류처분 규정에 대한 고찰- 대전고등법원 2018누12938 위헌제청결정을 중심으로 -
정당국가적 현실과 자유위임의 원칙에 관한 연구 - 국회 위원회 위원의 사·보임행위에 관한 헌법재판소 결정을 중심으로 -
자동차등록의 직권말소제도에 대한 재평가 - 서울고등법원 2010. 11. 25. 선고, 2010누13298판결 -
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2012-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.72 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.75 | 0.7 | 0.866 | 0.2 |