RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      AIED 연구 동향 분석을 통한 교육과정 연구 방향 탐색 = Exploring the Directions of Curriculum Research through an Analysis of Research Trends in AIED

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110040596

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to analyze research trends on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) to identify the current status of related studies and to discuss future directions for curriculum research. The findings are as follows. First, the concept of AIED has expanded across various domains, including research fields, major educational tools, and instructional activities. Second, for the trend analysis of curriculum-related AIED research, analytical criteria were classified by year, research method, school level, research topic, and perspectives on AIED. Third, studies on AIED have steadily increased from 2018 to 2024. Fourth, qualitative research, particularly content analysis, accounts for the largest proportion of AIED-related studies. Fifth, AIED research is most actively conducted at the elementary school level. Sixth, AIED studies focusing on school subjects constitute the highest proportion, with Korean language, ethics, and practical arts (technology and home economics) being the most frequently examined subjects. Seventh, studies addressing AI as “content” appear more frequently than those examining AI as an “educational tool.” Based on these results, several implications are suggested. First, further studies are needed to develop diverse analytical criteria to better utilize AIED research as suitable data for curriculum studies. Second, research that approaches AIED from the academic perspective of curriculum studies is required. Third, curriculum research on AIED should employ a wider variety of research methods. Fourth, AIED research at the secondary education level needs to be further expanded. Finally, for systematic curriculum development related to AIED, balanced research on AI as “content” and AI as “tool” is necessary.
      번역하기

      This study aims to analyze research trends on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) to identify the current status of related studies and to discuss future directions for curriculum research. The findings are as follows. First, the concept of AI...

      This study aims to analyze research trends on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) to identify the current status of related studies and to discuss future directions for curriculum research. The findings are as follows. First, the concept of AIED has expanded across various domains, including research fields, major educational tools, and instructional activities. Second, for the trend analysis of curriculum-related AIED research, analytical criteria were classified by year, research method, school level, research topic, and perspectives on AIED. Third, studies on AIED have steadily increased from 2018 to 2024. Fourth, qualitative research, particularly content analysis, accounts for the largest proportion of AIED-related studies. Fifth, AIED research is most actively conducted at the elementary school level. Sixth, AIED studies focusing on school subjects constitute the highest proportion, with Korean language, ethics, and practical arts (technology and home economics) being the most frequently examined subjects. Seventh, studies addressing AI as “content” appear more frequently than those examining AI as an “educational tool.” Based on these results, several implications are suggested. First, further studies are needed to develop diverse analytical criteria to better utilize AIED research as suitable data for curriculum studies. Second, research that approaches AIED from the academic perspective of curriculum studies is required. Third, curriculum research on AIED should employ a wider variety of research methods. Fourth, AIED research at the secondary education level needs to be further expanded. Finally, for systematic curriculum development related to AIED, balanced research on AI as “content” and AI as “tool” is necessary.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼