During the 16th and 17th century, the law that dictated the social status of an offspring born from a humble-ordinary marriage to be determined by the social class occupied by the father of the offspring(奴良妻幷産 從父法), was generating many...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76268416
2008
Korean
노비소송(奴婢訴訟) ; 노양처병산법(奴良妻幷産法) ; 종부법(從父法) ; 압공위천(壓公爲賤) ; 압공위사(壓公爲私) ; 투탁(投托) ; 반주(叛主) ; Nobi/奴婢 Lawsuits ; the law regarding the social status of an offspring born from a humble-ordinary marriage ; the law dictating the social status of such offspring to be determined by the social class occupied by the father of the offspring ; forcing an ordinary figure to a lowly position ; claiming a public entity as a private property ; surrendering ; Banju
900
KCI등재
학술저널
253-283(31쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
During the 16th and 17th century, the law that dictated the social status of an offspring born from a humble-ordinary marriage to be determined by the social class occupied by the father of the offspring(奴良妻幷産 從父法), was generating many...
During the 16th and 17th century, the law that dictated the social status of an offspring born from a humble-ordinary marriage to be determined by the social class occupied by the father of the offspring(奴良妻幷産 從父法), was generating many causes for lawsuits involving Nobi workers. Over issues such as the social status of those kind of offsprings or the issue of ownership regarding those individual offsprings, the owners of Nobi figures and the Nobi worker themselves, severely clashed and collided with each other.
At the time, Nobi Owners actually encouraged the Nobi figures they owned to marry ordinary class females. They even had females from humble origins registered as entities occupying ordinary statuses, and arranged marriages between them and the Nobi figures they owned, and then claimed the offsprings born out of those marriages as entities under their ownership. In the meantime, the females occupying ordinary status often chose to forfeit their social status and claimed themselves as humble Nobi figures, and then surrendered to other households(他家) or recipients as public servants(公賤). Governmental offices or offices working for the royal family such as Naesu-sa or Seonggyun-gwan became refugees for such willfully surrendering figures.
The conflicts and clashes that continued between the Nobi owners and Nobi figures burst out in the form of legal lawsuits. And there were certain characteristics to be noted as well. Owners of the Nobi figures claimed that the spouses of the Nobi figures they owned were from ordinary origin, yet the Nobi figures refused to admit their social status as ordinary figures and instead argued that they were in fact Nobi figures. We can see here that the intentions of the Nobi owners, who wished to claim the ownership over the offsprings born out of ordinary-humble couples by observing the so-called ‘Determining the status of the child by the status of the father(從父)’ rule, and the intentions of the Nobi figures, who wished to escape the status of a private Nobi(私奴婢) in order to better their working condition(身役) and living situations, were clashing with each other.
목차 (Table of Contents)
고려초기의 관계(官階) 수여 양상과 광종대 문산계(文散階) 도입의 배경
식민지시대 합덕리의 토지소유관계와 구합덕본당의 농업경영