RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      朝鮮申錫愚與淸人筆談考述 = Analysis onwritten discussions between Sin Xiyu from Chosun Dynasty and literati in Qing Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104865547

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article do a textual research on the content and features of written discussions between Sin Xiyu from Chosun dynasty and the literati of Qing dynasty. Sin Xiyu went to Qing with the identity of winter solstice ambassador in October 1860. He met a number of the literati in Qing Dynasty and left a great number of materilas, such as Yeon Heng Rok, letters, written discussions, poetries and so on. However, there were only four written discussions with six people including Lee Wenyuan, Shen Bincheng, Xie Zeng, Chen Gongshou, Song Shuxing and Song Shuxun. The contents of written discussions between Sin Xiyu and Lee Wenyuan were mianly about the family friendship between Sin Xiyu and Lee Boheng, bemoaning for Lee Boheng and enquiries related issues of Taiping movement.
      The contents of written discussions among Shen Xiyu, Shen Binchengand Xie Zeng were mainly about introduction to each other and making an appointment to catch up at Zhongheju on the 3rd of the first month of lunar year. The written discussions between Sin Xiyu and Chen gongshou were mainly about the admiration for Chen Gongshou, the return date of the emperor, contemporary issues about Taiping movement and the Nian army, and introduction of and Evaluation on famous painter Kin zhenxi and Zhao xilong who come from Chosun. The discussions between Sin Xiyu and Song Shuxing, Song Shuxun were mianly about what he saw and heard in Songjiazhuang on the way to Beijing. Song family was rich and built barriers to protect themselves from Qing’s entry. Many Chosun Dynasty ambassadors knew this story and they all visited Song. Sin XiYu mainly visited the building in songjiazhuang and inquired about their ancestors’ stories, related text materials and the issues for ritual and dressed.
      From the written discussions between Sin Xiyuan and literati in Qing Dynasty we can see that Sin Xiyu actively communicated with literati in Qing Dynasty, who have communicated with Chosun Dynasty, and new friends in Qing Dynasty. Furthermore, he also actively inquired the contemporary issues in Qing Dynasty. Although the written discussions are not long, it has rich contents. The written discussion between Sin Xiyuan and liberati in Qing Dynasty is signficiant to investigate literati communication between Qing and Chosun Dynasty in 19th century, to enrich communication between Qing and Chosun Dynasty, and to explore the truth and the details for social history at that time, with evidence. Therefore, they are of great literature value in studies about literati relationship History between China and Korea.
      번역하기

      This article do a textual research on the content and features of written discussions between Sin Xiyu from Chosun dynasty and the literati of Qing dynasty. Sin Xiyu went to Qing with the identity of winter solstice ambassador in October 1860. He met ...

      This article do a textual research on the content and features of written discussions between Sin Xiyu from Chosun dynasty and the literati of Qing dynasty. Sin Xiyu went to Qing with the identity of winter solstice ambassador in October 1860. He met a number of the literati in Qing Dynasty and left a great number of materilas, such as Yeon Heng Rok, letters, written discussions, poetries and so on. However, there were only four written discussions with six people including Lee Wenyuan, Shen Bincheng, Xie Zeng, Chen Gongshou, Song Shuxing and Song Shuxun. The contents of written discussions between Sin Xiyu and Lee Wenyuan were mianly about the family friendship between Sin Xiyu and Lee Boheng, bemoaning for Lee Boheng and enquiries related issues of Taiping movement.
      The contents of written discussions among Shen Xiyu, Shen Binchengand Xie Zeng were mainly about introduction to each other and making an appointment to catch up at Zhongheju on the 3rd of the first month of lunar year. The written discussions between Sin Xiyu and Chen gongshou were mainly about the admiration for Chen Gongshou, the return date of the emperor, contemporary issues about Taiping movement and the Nian army, and introduction of and Evaluation on famous painter Kin zhenxi and Zhao xilong who come from Chosun. The discussions between Sin Xiyu and Song Shuxing, Song Shuxun were mianly about what he saw and heard in Songjiazhuang on the way to Beijing. Song family was rich and built barriers to protect themselves from Qing’s entry. Many Chosun Dynasty ambassadors knew this story and they all visited Song. Sin XiYu mainly visited the building in songjiazhuang and inquired about their ancestors’ stories, related text materials and the issues for ritual and dressed.
      From the written discussions between Sin Xiyuan and literati in Qing Dynasty we can see that Sin Xiyu actively communicated with literati in Qing Dynasty, who have communicated with Chosun Dynasty, and new friends in Qing Dynasty. Furthermore, he also actively inquired the contemporary issues in Qing Dynasty. Although the written discussions are not long, it has rich contents. The written discussion between Sin Xiyuan and liberati in Qing Dynasty is signficiant to investigate literati communication between Qing and Chosun Dynasty in 19th century, to enrich communication between Qing and Chosun Dynasty, and to explore the truth and the details for social history at that time, with evidence. Therefore, they are of great literature value in studies about literati relationship History between China and Korea.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      本文考述了朝鮮文人申錫愚與淸朝文士的筆談內容及特點。申錫愚曾在1860年十月以冬至正使的身份岀使淸朝,結識了眾多淸朝人士,留下了燕行錄、尺牘、筆談、詩文等眾多資料,但是筆談資料卻只有4篇,筆談人物只有6人,分別爲李文源、沈秉成、謝增、程恭壽、宋舒惺與宋舒恂。 申錫愚與李文源的筆談內容主要談到申錫愚與李伯衡的世交以及對李伯衡的哀吊、探問太平天國運動相關問題。與沈秉成和謝增兩人的筆談,主要是相互通姓名,并約新正初三日再于中和局相見會談。與程恭壽的筆談主要涉及對程恭壽的欽慕之情,詢問皇帝回鑾時期以及太平天國與捻軍等時局情況,介紹很評價朝鮮著名書畫家金正喜與趙熙龍等內容。與宋舒惺、宋舒恂的筆談是在進入北京的途中經過宋家莊,宋氏家富豪築城壘,自保於淸人入關之時,朝鮮使臣多聞知其事跡,光顧者很多。申錫愚主要觀看了宋家莊舍城樓,并詢問其宋氏祖先事跡和相關文字資料、以及祭祀是的衣冠问题。 申錫愚與淸人的筆談中我們可以看到申錫愚積極結交與朝鮮人士有交情的淸人,主動結交新的淸朝友人,積極探詢淸朝時局情勢,雖然篇幅不長,但內容豐富等的筆談特點。申錫愚與淸人的筆談對於了解19世紀末中朝兩國文人的交流,豐富兩國文人交流內容,以及了解當時社會歷史真相與細節,有很好的補充和見證意義,因此對於中韓文人關係史研究具有寶貴的文獻價值。
      번역하기

      本文考述了朝鮮文人申錫愚與淸朝文士的筆談內容及特點。申錫愚曾在1860年十月以冬至正使的身份岀使淸朝,結識了眾多淸朝人士,留下了燕行錄、尺牘、筆談、詩文等眾多資料,但是筆談...

      本文考述了朝鮮文人申錫愚與淸朝文士的筆談內容及特點。申錫愚曾在1860年十月以冬至正使的身份岀使淸朝,結識了眾多淸朝人士,留下了燕行錄、尺牘、筆談、詩文等眾多資料,但是筆談資料卻只有4篇,筆談人物只有6人,分別爲李文源、沈秉成、謝增、程恭壽、宋舒惺與宋舒恂。 申錫愚與李文源的筆談內容主要談到申錫愚與李伯衡的世交以及對李伯衡的哀吊、探問太平天國運動相關問題。與沈秉成和謝增兩人的筆談,主要是相互通姓名,并約新正初三日再于中和局相見會談。與程恭壽的筆談主要涉及對程恭壽的欽慕之情,詢問皇帝回鑾時期以及太平天國與捻軍等時局情況,介紹很評價朝鮮著名書畫家金正喜與趙熙龍等內容。與宋舒惺、宋舒恂的筆談是在進入北京的途中經過宋家莊,宋氏家富豪築城壘,自保於淸人入關之時,朝鮮使臣多聞知其事跡,光顧者很多。申錫愚主要觀看了宋家莊舍城樓,并詢問其宋氏祖先事跡和相關文字資料、以及祭祀是的衣冠问题。 申錫愚與淸人的筆談中我們可以看到申錫愚積極結交與朝鮮人士有交情的淸人,主動結交新的淸朝友人,積極探詢淸朝時局情勢,雖然篇幅不長,但內容豐富等的筆談特點。申錫愚與淸人的筆談對於了解19世紀末中朝兩國文人的交流,豐富兩國文人交流內容,以及了解當時社會歷史真相與細節,有很好的補充和見證意義,因此對於中韓文人關係史研究具有寶貴的文獻價值。

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 천금매, "金永爵과 한중 척독교류의 새 자료 『中朝學士書翰錄』" 동양고전학회 (34) : 167-206, 2009

      2 장진영, "해장 신석우의 『입연기』 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2011

      3 金永爵, "邵亭詩稿"

      4 金永爵, "邵亭文稿"

      5 申錫愚, "海藏集"

      6 이관성, "海藏 申錫愚의 생애와 문학론" 우리한문학회 17 (17): 473-497, 2007

      7 김명호, "海藏 申錫愚의 『入燕記』에 대한 고찰" 한국고전문학회 (32) : 465-488, 2007

      8 허경진, "洪大容 집안에서 편집한『燕杭詩牘』" 열상고전연구회 (27) : 247-298, 2008

      9 申錫愚, "入燕記"

      10 "中朝學士書翰錄"

      1 천금매, "金永爵과 한중 척독교류의 새 자료 『中朝學士書翰錄』" 동양고전학회 (34) : 167-206, 2009

      2 장진영, "해장 신석우의 『입연기』 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2011

      3 金永爵, "邵亭詩稿"

      4 金永爵, "邵亭文稿"

      5 申錫愚, "海藏集"

      6 이관성, "海藏 申錫愚의 생애와 문학론" 우리한문학회 17 (17): 473-497, 2007

      7 김명호, "海藏 申錫愚의 『入燕記』에 대한 고찰" 한국고전문학회 (32) : 465-488, 2007

      8 허경진, "洪大容 집안에서 편집한『燕杭詩牘』" 열상고전연구회 (27) : 247-298, 2008

      9 申錫愚, "入燕記"

      10 "中朝學士書翰錄"

      11 千金梅, "18~19世紀朝中交流尺牘研究" 延世大學校 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-07-21 학회명변경 영문명 : Http://Www.Daedonghanmunhak.Co.Kr -> http://www.daedonghanmun.or.kr/ KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.61 0.61 1.492 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼