RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    리츠의 배당가능이익 관련 세무상 이슈 및 개선방안 = Tax Issues and Improvement Measures Related to Distributable Profits of REITs

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109355327

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have become an alternative investment to stocks and bonds due to their low volatility, high dividend yields, and liquidity. However, increased volatility in distributable profits due to tax issues has emerged, requiring investor caution. This study examines the tax issues related to REITs dividends through the recent case of Koramco Asset Trust, a prominent topic in the 2023 domestic REITs market. The tax authorities imposed additional corporate tax on Koramco Asset Trust, arguing that the carried-forward losses generated from depreciation, which is the source of excess dividends, should be excluded from income deductions. Koramco Asset Trust, however, asserted that there were no issues with income deductions based on the Real Estate Investment Company Act and ultimately concluded that income deduction was possible.
    As a corporation under the Real Estate Investment Company Act, REITs are obligated to pay corporate tax. However, if more than 90% of distributable profits are distributed as dividends, the amount is deducted from the taxable income, exempting the REITs from corporate tax. Therefore, the distributable profit of a REITs is crucial not only as the total amount of dividends paid to investors but also as the key criterion determining the eligibility for dividend income deduction.
    This significantly impacts the corporate tax expenses of REITs and is an essential factor in establishing dividend policies.
    The tax issues related to REIT dividends stem from differences in the perspectives between the Commercial Act, the Corporate Tax Act, and the disparity between the Corporate Tax Act and the Real Estate Investment Company Act regarding the calculation of distributable profits. The difference in the calculation of distributable profits between the Commercial Act and the Corporate Tax Act arises from their differing views on unrealized gains. Meanwhile, the difference between the Corporate Tax Act and the Real Estate Investment Company Act regarding distributable profits is due to the differing perspectives on whether it is permissible to distribute dividends in excess of retained earnings, which result from losses carried forward due to depreciation expenses.
    This study proposes two improvement directions. First, it suggests amending the Corporate Tax Act to align the scope of assets subject to unrealized gains with that of the Commercial Act. This amendment could alleviate the controversy surrounding the deductibility of income due to distributable profits. Second, it recommends revising the enforcement decree of the Corporate Tax Act to apply an exception where losses carried forward are not included in the current distributable profits during excess dividend distributions. This would help reduce the discrepancy between the Corporate Tax Act and the Real Estate Investment Company Act regarding distributable profits.
    This study aims to contribute to the long-term growth and stability of REITs’ dividend policies, thereby ensuring long-term returns for investors. It examines various cases involving tax issues related to distributable profits in REITs are examined to understand the calculation methods and reasons for conflicts among the relevant laws. Based on this analysis, a unified amendment to the tax law is proposed to resolve differences in the calculation of distributable profits, which is expected to help revitalize the domestic REIT market.
    번역하기

    Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have become an alternative investment to stocks and bonds due to their low volatility, high dividend yields, and liquidity. However, increased volatility in distributable profits due to tax issues has emerged, req...

    Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have become an alternative investment to stocks and bonds due to their low volatility, high dividend yields, and liquidity. However, increased volatility in distributable profits due to tax issues has emerged, requiring investor caution. This study examines the tax issues related to REITs dividends through the recent case of Koramco Asset Trust, a prominent topic in the 2023 domestic REITs market. The tax authorities imposed additional corporate tax on Koramco Asset Trust, arguing that the carried-forward losses generated from depreciation, which is the source of excess dividends, should be excluded from income deductions. Koramco Asset Trust, however, asserted that there were no issues with income deductions based on the Real Estate Investment Company Act and ultimately concluded that income deduction was possible.
    As a corporation under the Real Estate Investment Company Act, REITs are obligated to pay corporate tax. However, if more than 90% of distributable profits are distributed as dividends, the amount is deducted from the taxable income, exempting the REITs from corporate tax. Therefore, the distributable profit of a REITs is crucial not only as the total amount of dividends paid to investors but also as the key criterion determining the eligibility for dividend income deduction.
    This significantly impacts the corporate tax expenses of REITs and is an essential factor in establishing dividend policies.
    The tax issues related to REIT dividends stem from differences in the perspectives between the Commercial Act, the Corporate Tax Act, and the disparity between the Corporate Tax Act and the Real Estate Investment Company Act regarding the calculation of distributable profits. The difference in the calculation of distributable profits between the Commercial Act and the Corporate Tax Act arises from their differing views on unrealized gains. Meanwhile, the difference between the Corporate Tax Act and the Real Estate Investment Company Act regarding distributable profits is due to the differing perspectives on whether it is permissible to distribute dividends in excess of retained earnings, which result from losses carried forward due to depreciation expenses.
    This study proposes two improvement directions. First, it suggests amending the Corporate Tax Act to align the scope of assets subject to unrealized gains with that of the Commercial Act. This amendment could alleviate the controversy surrounding the deductibility of income due to distributable profits. Second, it recommends revising the enforcement decree of the Corporate Tax Act to apply an exception where losses carried forward are not included in the current distributable profits during excess dividend distributions. This would help reduce the discrepancy between the Corporate Tax Act and the Real Estate Investment Company Act regarding distributable profits.
    This study aims to contribute to the long-term growth and stability of REITs’ dividend policies, thereby ensuring long-term returns for investors. It examines various cases involving tax issues related to distributable profits in REITs are examined to understand the calculation methods and reasons for conflicts among the relevant laws. Based on this analysis, a unified amendment to the tax law is proposed to resolve differences in the calculation of distributable profits, which is expected to help revitalize the domestic REIT market.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김광윤, "최근 상법상 회계규정의 개정시안에 대한 비판적 고찰" 15 (15): 23-41, 2006

    2 심영, "주식회사의 배당가능이익 계산과 미실현이익" 33 (33): 43-71, 2014

    3 하미혜 ; 박경진 ; 유영태, "재무보고상 배당가능이익과 상법상의 배당가능이익의 차이에관한 연구" 24 (24): 317-345, 2015

    4 신현걸, "상법상 배당가능이익의 계산과 공시의 개선" 36 (36): 71-96, 2022

    5 박정우, "상법상 계산제도의 개선에 관한 연구" 10 : 91-118, 2002

    6 김수성 ; 최경진, "리츠(REITs)배당가능이익에 대한 세제의 문제점 및 개선방안" 9 (9): 77-107, 2024

    7 박정우, "기업회계제도의 법적규제에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 141-169, 1999

    8 김지홍, "기업회계원칙과 상법상의 기업회계규정에 나타난 차이인식 및 문제연구" 8 (8): 53-78, 1999

    9 김광윤 ; 강경진, "개정상법상 배당가능이익 계산제도의 문제점과 개선방향" (59) : 147-177, 2014

    1 김광윤, "최근 상법상 회계규정의 개정시안에 대한 비판적 고찰" 15 (15): 23-41, 2006

    2 심영, "주식회사의 배당가능이익 계산과 미실현이익" 33 (33): 43-71, 2014

    3 하미혜 ; 박경진 ; 유영태, "재무보고상 배당가능이익과 상법상의 배당가능이익의 차이에관한 연구" 24 (24): 317-345, 2015

    4 신현걸, "상법상 배당가능이익의 계산과 공시의 개선" 36 (36): 71-96, 2022

    5 박정우, "상법상 계산제도의 개선에 관한 연구" 10 : 91-118, 2002

    6 김수성 ; 최경진, "리츠(REITs)배당가능이익에 대한 세제의 문제점 및 개선방안" 9 (9): 77-107, 2024

    7 박정우, "기업회계제도의 법적규제에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 141-169, 1999

    8 김지홍, "기업회계원칙과 상법상의 기업회계규정에 나타난 차이인식 및 문제연구" 8 (8): 53-78, 1999

    9 김광윤 ; 강경진, "개정상법상 배당가능이익 계산제도의 문제점과 개선방향" (59) : 147-177, 2014

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼