RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    대서양 세계의 형성과 ‘서구의 흥기’

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102967176

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recent historiography has stressed the need for a global perspective that surpasses the national borders of today. It is important to grasp how “the Atlantic World” was formed, especially in order to understand the development of the modern world. K. Pomeranz aroused disputes about the origin of the economic hegemony of the West over the rest of the world, setting the period of “the Great Divergence” at the end of the eighteenth century. Among the scholars who participated in the debate, D. Acemoglu drew our attention with his ingenious hypothesis of the First Great Divergence. He asserted that the Atlantic trade and the associated colonialism affected Europe not only directly, but also indirectly by inducing institutional change. Where “initial” political institutions placed significant checks on the monarchy, the growth of the Atlantic trade strengthened merchant groups by constraining the power of the monarchy. It helped merchants achieve political changes to protect their property rights. These changes were central to subsequent economic growth of the Northwestern countries such as England and the Netherlands, which came to link together and dominate the global seas.
    번역하기

    Recent historiography has stressed the need for a global perspective that surpasses the national borders of today. It is important to grasp how “the Atlantic World” was formed, especially in order to understand the development of the modern world....

    Recent historiography has stressed the need for a global perspective that surpasses the national borders of today. It is important to grasp how “the Atlantic World” was formed, especially in order to understand the development of the modern world. K. Pomeranz aroused disputes about the origin of the economic hegemony of the West over the rest of the world, setting the period of “the Great Divergence” at the end of the eighteenth century. Among the scholars who participated in the debate, D. Acemoglu drew our attention with his ingenious hypothesis of the First Great Divergence. He asserted that the Atlantic trade and the associated colonialism affected Europe not only directly, but also indirectly by inducing institutional change. Where “initial” political institutions placed significant checks on the monarchy, the growth of the Atlantic trade strengthened merchant groups by constraining the power of the monarchy. It helped merchants achieve political changes to protect their property rights. These changes were central to subsequent economic growth of the Northwestern countries such as England and the Netherlands, which came to link together and dominate the global seas.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 머리말
    • II. 대서양의 연결: 시각의 점검
    • III. 파괴와 네트워크의 형성
    • IV. 새로운 질서: 설탕과 노예
    • V. 대분기론에 대한 재검토: ‘대분기’와 ‘1차 대분기’
    • I. 머리말
    • II. 대서양의 연결: 시각의 점검
    • III. 파괴와 네트워크의 형성
    • IV. 새로운 질서: 설탕과 노예
    • V. 대분기론에 대한 재검토: ‘대분기’와 ‘1차 대분기’
    • VI. 두 이론의 절충
    • VII. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 주경철, "크리스토퍼 콜럼버스, 종말론적 신비주의자" 서울대학교출판문화원 2013

    2 강진아, "중국의 부상과 세계사의 재조명 -캘리포니아 학파에서 글로벌 헤게모니論까지-" 부산경남사학회 (80) : 145-186, 2011

    3 시드니 민츠, "설탕과 권력" 지호 1998

    4 페르낭 브로델, "물질문명과 자본주의" 도서출판까치 2004

    5 주경철, "문명과 바다" 산처럼 [서울] 2009

    6 주경철, "마녀, 서구 문명은 왜 마녀를 필요로 했는가" 생각의힘 2016

    7 주경철, "대항해시대" 서울대학교출판부 2008

    8 버나드 베일린, "대서양의 역사, 개념과 범주" 뿌리와이파리 2010

    9 이영석, "‘大分岐’와 근면혁명론" 호남사학회 (58) : 345-377, 2015

    10 Jan de Vries, "The economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600~1750" Cambridge University Press 1976

    1 주경철, "크리스토퍼 콜럼버스, 종말론적 신비주의자" 서울대학교출판문화원 2013

    2 강진아, "중국의 부상과 세계사의 재조명 -캘리포니아 학파에서 글로벌 헤게모니論까지-" 부산경남사학회 (80) : 145-186, 2011

    3 시드니 민츠, "설탕과 권력" 지호 1998

    4 페르낭 브로델, "물질문명과 자본주의" 도서출판까치 2004

    5 주경철, "문명과 바다" 산처럼 [서울] 2009

    6 주경철, "마녀, 서구 문명은 왜 마녀를 필요로 했는가" 생각의힘 2016

    7 주경철, "대항해시대" 서울대학교출판부 2008

    8 버나드 베일린, "대서양의 역사, 개념과 범주" 뿌리와이파리 2010

    9 이영석, "‘大分岐’와 근면혁명론" 호남사학회 (58) : 345-377, 2015

    10 Jan de Vries, "The economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600~1750" Cambridge University Press 1976

    11 Angus Maddison, "The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective" OECD, Development Center 2001

    12 David Watts, "The West Indies, Patterns of Development, Culture and Environmental Change since 1492" Cambridge University Press 1987

    13 Stanley L. Engerman, "The Slave Trade and British Capital Formation in the Eighteenth Century: A Comment on the Williams Thesis" 46 (46):

    14 Douglass C. North, "The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History" Cambridge University Press 1973

    15 Ward Barrett, "The Rise of Merchant Empires, Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern World, 1350~1750" Cambridge University Press 1990

    16 Daron Acemoglu, "The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Industrial Change, and Economic Growth" 95 (95):

    17 Immanuel M. Wallerstein, "The Modern World-System. 3 Volumes" Academic Press 1974

    18 Geoffrey Parker, "The Military Revolution, Military Innovation and the Rise of the West 1500~1800" Cambridge University Press 1996

    19 Kenneth Pomeranz, "The Great Divergence. China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World" Princeton University Press 2000

    20 Eric L. Jones, "The European Miracle: Environments, Economies, and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia" Cambridge University Press 1981

    21 Bartolome Las Casas, "The Devastation of the Indies: A Brief Account" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1965

    22 Robert Brenner, "The Civil War Politics of London’s Merchant Community" 58 :

    23 David Armitage, "The Age of Revolutions in Global Context" Palgrave 1760-1840, 2010

    24 Huguette, "Seville et l’Atlantique, 1504~1650"

    25 Robert Brenner, "Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550~1653" Verso 2003

    26 Geoffrey Parker, "Global Crisis: War, Climate Change and Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century" Yale University Press 2014

    27 Jan de Vries, "European Urbanization, 1500~1800" Harvard University Press 1984

    28 Patrick K. O’Brien, "European Economic Development: The Contribution of the Periphery" 35 (35):

    29 Andre G. Frank, "Dependent Accumulation and Underdevelopment" Macmillan 1978

    30 Paul Bairoch, "Cities, Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes" University of Chicago Press 1993

    31 Paul Bairoch, "Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present" University of Chicago Press 1988

    32 Eric Williams, "Capitalism and Slavery" University of North Carolina Press 1944

    33 Brian Manning, "Aristocrats, Plebeians, and Revolution in England, 1640~1660" Pluto Press 1996

    34 Joseph E. Inikori, "Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England: A study in International Trade and Economic Development" Cambridge University Press 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.05 1.05 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.75 1.505 0.51
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼