RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      주요국가의 개도국에 대한 법제정비 지원 사업 = Major Donor Countries` Legal Technical Assistance to Developing Countries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892272

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The last several decades of economic assistance to developing countries has shown that such assistance cannot be successful without good governance in the recipient states. The most important component of good governance is the rule of law. In this regard, donor countries have emphasized the importance of the rule of law and legal reform aid, and has provided assistance in these areas to aid recipients. In particular, the transition of economies of former socialist countries and newly independent countries to market-based systems has reinforced this importance. The most active countries leading initiatives in the area of legal technical aid are the U.S., Japan, and Germany. This article introduces and examines these three countries`` aid to developing nations. Of the keenest interest to these donor countries has been how to enhance and improve the rule of law which facilitates market-based economics and democratic governance. These three countries have unique characteristics related to their own policies, the volume of aid they provide, and the legal assets they possess. The United States has been pioneer and has played the most important role in this area on the global level. Japan has payed more attention to this area in the Asian region. Germany has been also very active in providing legal aid thanks to its unique experience of unification and continental legal tradition. As Korea has increased the volume of ODA it provides and has expanded its global influence through economic and political development, we Koreans need to look at the activities of major donor countries and learn lessons from their experiences. In particular, in consideration of the future transition of the North Korean system to a market economy, this issue should be examined with more care.
      번역하기

      The last several decades of economic assistance to developing countries has shown that such assistance cannot be successful without good governance in the recipient states. The most important component of good governance is the rule of law. In this re...

      The last several decades of economic assistance to developing countries has shown that such assistance cannot be successful without good governance in the recipient states. The most important component of good governance is the rule of law. In this regard, donor countries have emphasized the importance of the rule of law and legal reform aid, and has provided assistance in these areas to aid recipients. In particular, the transition of economies of former socialist countries and newly independent countries to market-based systems has reinforced this importance. The most active countries leading initiatives in the area of legal technical aid are the U.S., Japan, and Germany. This article introduces and examines these three countries`` aid to developing nations. Of the keenest interest to these donor countries has been how to enhance and improve the rule of law which facilitates market-based economics and democratic governance. These three countries have unique characteristics related to their own policies, the volume of aid they provide, and the legal assets they possess. The United States has been pioneer and has played the most important role in this area on the global level. Japan has payed more attention to this area in the Asian region. Germany has been also very active in providing legal aid thanks to its unique experience of unification and continental legal tradition. As Korea has increased the volume of ODA it provides and has expanded its global influence through economic and political development, we Koreans need to look at the activities of major donor countries and learn lessons from their experiences. In particular, in consideration of the future transition of the North Korean system to a market economy, this issue should be examined with more care.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권오승, "체제전환국 법제정비지원" 서울대학교출판부 2006

      2 심동섭, "세계화와 법의 교류" 도서출판 해든 2006

      3 정순원, "북한경제 체제전환에 따른 법제구축에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 2007

      4 윤대규, "북한 경제개혁을 위한 새로운 패러다임: 개발협력의 이론과 실제" 한울 2006

      5 기획예산처, "『’08년 예산ㆍ기금안의 10대 특징』"

      6 국회예산정책처, "『2008년도 예산안 분석(Ⅳ)』"

      7 USAID, "“Summary Report,” United States Government Initiatives to Build Trade Related Capacity in Developing and Transition Countries(USAID, Oct. 2001)"

      8 Binh, Le Duy, "“Improving the Quality of Business Environment Reforms-The Example of the Reform of the Enterprise Law in Vietnam,” Promoting the Business and Investment Climate: Experiences of German Technical Assistance (Division of Economic Development and Employment, GTZ, 2005)"

      9 USAID, "“Europe and the New Independent States,” Budget Justification to the Congress for FY 2001(USAID, 2001)"

      10 USAID, "“Europe and the New Independent States,” Budget Justification to the Congress for FY 1998(USAID, 1998)"

      1 권오승, "체제전환국 법제정비지원" 서울대학교출판부 2006

      2 심동섭, "세계화와 법의 교류" 도서출판 해든 2006

      3 정순원, "북한경제 체제전환에 따른 법제구축에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 2007

      4 윤대규, "북한 경제개혁을 위한 새로운 패러다임: 개발협력의 이론과 실제" 한울 2006

      5 기획예산처, "『’08년 예산ㆍ기금안의 10대 특징』"

      6 국회예산정책처, "『2008년도 예산안 분석(Ⅳ)』"

      7 USAID, "“Summary Report,” United States Government Initiatives to Build Trade Related Capacity in Developing and Transition Countries(USAID, Oct. 2001)"

      8 Binh, Le Duy, "“Improving the Quality of Business Environment Reforms-The Example of the Reform of the Enterprise Law in Vietnam,” Promoting the Business and Investment Climate: Experiences of German Technical Assistance (Division of Economic Development and Employment, GTZ, 2005)"

      9 USAID, "“Europe and the New Independent States,” Budget Justification to the Congress for FY 2001(USAID, 2001)"

      10 USAID, "“Europe and the New Independent States,” Budget Justification to the Congress for FY 1998(USAID, 1998)"

      11 USAID, "“Europe and the New Independent States,” Budget Justification to the Congress for FY 1997(USAID, 1997)"

      12 USAID, "“Achievements in Building and Maintaining the Rule of Law,” Occasional Paper Series(Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID, 2002)"

      13 World Bank, "The World Bank and Legal Technical Assistance: Initial Lessons" The World Bank 1995

      14 GTZ, "The Road to Achieving the Millennium Development Goals(GTZ, 2005)"

      15 Trubek, David M., "The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal" Cambridge University Press 2006

      16 "Sevastik, Per ed., Legal Assistance to Developing Countries: Swedish Perspectives on the Rule of Law(Stockholm: Kluwer Law International, 1997)."

      17 "Norton, Joseph J. Evaluating Multilateral Legal Reform Programmes-Lessons From EBRD's Legal Transition Programme: Mid-Term Review(A World Bank Conference, 2001)."

      18 "Institute for International Cooperation (ICD) & JICA, The Kingdom of Cambodia: From Reconstruction to Sustainable Development(ICD & JICA, 2002)."

      19 World Bank, "Implementation Completion Report, Economic Law Reform Project, People's Republic of China(The World Bank, 2005)"

      20 BMZ, "Good Governance in German Development Cooperation: Position Paper(BMZ, 2002)"

      21 GTZ, "GTZ Annual Report 2003(GTZ, 2003)"

      22 USAID, "From Rule of Men to Rule of Law in Europe and Eurasia: A Synthesis of Eight Country Impact Assessments(USAID, Feb. 2004)"

      23 USAID, "Evaluation of the Rule of Law Program in Central and Eastern Europe and the New Independent States: The American Bar Association/ Central and Eastern Europe Law Initiative(ABA/CEELI)-Final Report(USAID, 1999)"

      24 Shihata, Ibrahim F. I., "Contemporary Reform: Essays on Legal, Judicial and Other Institutional Reforms Supported by the World Bank(Kluwer Law International, The Haugue, 1997)"

      25 USAID, "Commercial Legal Reform Assessment for Europe and Eurasia, Diagnostic Assessment Report for Albania(USAID, 2000)"

      26 USAID, "Building Trade Capacity in the Developing World(USAID, 2003)"

      27 Terutoshi, Yamashita, "Brief Introduction of Japan's Legal Assistance and the International Cooperation Department(ICD), Research and Training Institute(RATI), (Ministry of Justice, 2003)"

      28 JICA, "Basic Policy for Legal Assistance of Japan(JICA, 2001)"

      29 "BMZ, Legal and Judicial Reform in Development Cooperation(Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, BMZ, 2002)."

      30 USAID, "Assessment of USAID Commercial Law and Regulatory Reform Activities in Kyrgyz Republic(USAID, 2004)"

      31 USAID, "Assessment of USAID Commercial Law Reform Activities in Tajikistan (USAID, 2005)"

      32 JICA, "Approaches for Systemic Planning of Development Project: Trade and Investment Promotion(JICA, 2004)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼