RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Guided Instruction of Introducing Computational Thinking to Non-Computer Science Education Major Pre-Service Teachers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104586682

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Since ‘teaching coding’ or ‘programming’ classes for computational thinking (CT) education in K-12 are renowned around the world, a pre-service teachers’ readiness for integrating CT into their teaching subjects is important due to the fact that CT is considered to be another ‘R’ from algoRitm for 21st century literacy, in addition to the traditional 3R (Reading, Writhing, and Arithmetic) [2] and CT roles to other disciplines. With this rationale, we designed a guided instruction based CT course for pre-service teachers. We show the effectiveness of the program with respect to the teachers’ attitude toward combining CT into their teaching subjects, and mindset changes of learning computing connected with the career development of the teacher themselves. The research focused on the instructional methodology of teaching programing for non-Computer Science Education (CSE) majors who are not familiar with computer science for alleviating the cognitive load of first exposure to programming course under the CT concepts.
      번역하기

      Since ‘teaching coding’ or ‘programming’ classes for computational thinking (CT) education in K-12 are renowned around the world, a pre-service teachers’ readiness for integrating CT into their teaching subjects is important due to the fact ...

      Since ‘teaching coding’ or ‘programming’ classes for computational thinking (CT) education in K-12 are renowned around the world, a pre-service teachers’ readiness for integrating CT into their teaching subjects is important due to the fact that CT is considered to be another ‘R’ from algoRitm for 21st century literacy, in addition to the traditional 3R (Reading, Writhing, and Arithmetic) [2] and CT roles to other disciplines. With this rationale, we designed a guided instruction based CT course for pre-service teachers. We show the effectiveness of the program with respect to the teachers’ attitude toward combining CT into their teaching subjects, and mindset changes of learning computing connected with the career development of the teacher themselves. The research focused on the instructional methodology of teaching programing for non-Computer Science Education (CSE) majors who are not familiar with computer science for alleviating the cognitive load of first exposure to programming course under the CT concepts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 P. A. Kirschner, "Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work : an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching" 41 (41): 75-86, 2006

      2 S. Fincher, "What are We Doing When We Teach Programming?" 1999

      3 R. E. Clark, "Putting Students on the Path to Learning" (Spring) : 6-11, 2012

      4 P. K. Chilana, "Perceptions of non-CS majors in intro programming: The rise of the conversational programmer" 2015

      5 A. Yadav, "Introducing Computational Thinking in Education Courses" 2011

      6 M. Guzdial, "How we teach introductory computer science is wrong"

      7 "Computing Our Future, “Computer programming and coding Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe,”"

      8 "Computing Education Blog, What‟s the argument for becoming a computer science teacher?"

      9 Lee, F. Martin, "Computational thinking for youth in practice" 2 (2): 32-37, 2011

      10 S. Grover, "Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field" 422 (422): 38-43, 2013

      1 P. A. Kirschner, "Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work : an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching" 41 (41): 75-86, 2006

      2 S. Fincher, "What are We Doing When We Teach Programming?" 1999

      3 R. E. Clark, "Putting Students on the Path to Learning" (Spring) : 6-11, 2012

      4 P. K. Chilana, "Perceptions of non-CS majors in intro programming: The rise of the conversational programmer" 2015

      5 A. Yadav, "Introducing Computational Thinking in Education Courses" 2011

      6 M. Guzdial, "How we teach introductory computer science is wrong"

      7 "Computing Our Future, “Computer programming and coding Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe,”"

      8 "Computing Education Blog, What‟s the argument for becoming a computer science teacher?"

      9 Lee, F. Martin, "Computational thinking for youth in practice" 2 (2): 32-37, 2011

      10 S. Grover, "Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field" 422 (422): 38-43, 2013

      11 A. Yadav, "Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education" 14 (14): 5:1-5:16, 2014

      12 ISTE, "Computational Thinking Teacher Resources"

      13 Wing, J.M, "Computational Thinking Benefits Societies"

      14 Wing, J.M, "Computational Thinking" 49 (49): 33-35, 2006

      15 S. -Y. Park, "Cognitive Load Changes in Pre-Service Teachers with Computational Thinking Education1" 9 (9): 169-178, 2015

      16 Z. Jiang, "A Pedagogical Pattern for Teaching Computer Programming to Non-CS Majors" 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Institute of Webcasting, Internet and Telecommunication -> The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
      2010-06-21 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인터넷방송통신TV학회 -> 한국인터넷방송통신학회
      영문명 : Institute Of Webcasting, Internet Television And Telecommunication -> The Institute of Webcasting, Internet and Telecommunication
      2005-08-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인터넷방송/TV학회 -> 한국인터넷방송통신TV학회
      영문명 : Institute Of Webcasting, Internet Television And Telecommunication -> Institute Of Webcasting, Internet Television And Telecommunication
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼