RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Comparison of oncologic outcomes of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to tumor location: perihilar cholangiocarcinoma versus distal bile duct cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108006577

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is distinguished into perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) and distal bile duct cancer (DBC). The studies for each subtype have been conducted separately. This study compared oncological outcomes between PHC and DBC.
      Methods: From 2001 to 2017, patients who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital for PHC or DBC were enrolled. T stage was reclassified for tumor extent as ‘confined to’ or ‘beyond’ the bile duct (BD). In survival analysis, stage matching was performed based on tumor extent and lymph node (LN) metastasis.
      Results: There were 680 patients enrolled: 295 with PHC and 385 with DBC. The R0 resection rate was higher in DBC (77.3% vs. 89.9%, P = 0.001). Tumors confined to BD were more common in PHC (61.7% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.001). The 5-year survival rate (5YSR) was higher in DBC patients (30.8% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.001). After stage matching, DBC patients showed better 5YSR for tumors confined to BD/LN(–) (47.1% vs. 64.3%), confined to BD/LN(+) (22.0% vs. 35.0%), beyond BD/LN(–) (21.9% vs. 49.8%), and beyond BD/LN(+) (9.6% vs. 26.9%). The overall recurrence rate was higher in PHC (59.7% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.045), with no difference in the recurrence types between two groups. Radiation therapy was effective for patients with advanced stage disease (5YSR: 35.8% vs. 29.5%, P = 0.022); adjuvant chemotherapy was effective for patients receiving R1 resection (5YSR: 37.3% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.040).
      Conclusion: Differences were identified in oncological outcomes between PHC and DBC, including pathologic findings and survival outcomes.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is distinguished into perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) and distal bile duct cancer (DBC). The studies for each subtype have been conducted separately. This study compared oncological outcomes between PHC and ...

      Purpose: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is distinguished into perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) and distal bile duct cancer (DBC). The studies for each subtype have been conducted separately. This study compared oncological outcomes between PHC and DBC.
      Methods: From 2001 to 2017, patients who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital for PHC or DBC were enrolled. T stage was reclassified for tumor extent as ‘confined to’ or ‘beyond’ the bile duct (BD). In survival analysis, stage matching was performed based on tumor extent and lymph node (LN) metastasis.
      Results: There were 680 patients enrolled: 295 with PHC and 385 with DBC. The R0 resection rate was higher in DBC (77.3% vs. 89.9%, P = 0.001). Tumors confined to BD were more common in PHC (61.7% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.001). The 5-year survival rate (5YSR) was higher in DBC patients (30.8% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.001). After stage matching, DBC patients showed better 5YSR for tumors confined to BD/LN(–) (47.1% vs. 64.3%), confined to BD/LN(+) (22.0% vs. 35.0%), beyond BD/LN(–) (21.9% vs. 49.8%), and beyond BD/LN(+) (9.6% vs. 26.9%). The overall recurrence rate was higher in PHC (59.7% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.045), with no difference in the recurrence types between two groups. Radiation therapy was effective for patients with advanced stage disease (5YSR: 35.8% vs. 29.5%, P = 0.022); adjuvant chemotherapy was effective for patients receiving R1 resection (5YSR: 37.3% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.040).
      Conclusion: Differences were identified in oncological outcomes between PHC and DBC, including pathologic findings and survival outcomes.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Wellner UF, "The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection : a metaanalysis for the 5-year survival" 47 : 271-279, 2017

      2 Edge SB, "The American Joint Committee on Cancer : the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM" 17 : 1471-1474, 2010

      3 Akamatsu N, "Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer : advances and current limitations" 2 : 94-107, 2011

      4 Reding R, "Surgical management of 552 carcinomas of the extrahepatic bile ducts (gallbladder and periampullary tumors excluded). Results of the French Surgical Association Survey" 213 : 236-241, 1991

      5 Tyson GL, "Secular trends in the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in the USA and the impact of misclassification" 59 : 3103-3110, 2014

      6 Sakamoto Y, "Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer : an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins" 137 : 396-402, 2005

      7 Hu HJ, "Prognostic factors and longterm outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma : a single-institution experience in China" 22 : 2601-2610, 2016

      8 Murakami Y, "Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma" 18 : 651-658, 2011

      9 Yoshida T, "Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer" 137 : 69-73, 2002

      10 Bird N, "Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma" 105 : 1408-1416, 2018

      1 Wellner UF, "The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection : a metaanalysis for the 5-year survival" 47 : 271-279, 2017

      2 Edge SB, "The American Joint Committee on Cancer : the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM" 17 : 1471-1474, 2010

      3 Akamatsu N, "Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer : advances and current limitations" 2 : 94-107, 2011

      4 Reding R, "Surgical management of 552 carcinomas of the extrahepatic bile ducts (gallbladder and periampullary tumors excluded). Results of the French Surgical Association Survey" 213 : 236-241, 1991

      5 Tyson GL, "Secular trends in the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in the USA and the impact of misclassification" 59 : 3103-3110, 2014

      6 Sakamoto Y, "Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer : an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins" 137 : 396-402, 2005

      7 Hu HJ, "Prognostic factors and longterm outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma : a single-institution experience in China" 22 : 2601-2610, 2016

      8 Murakami Y, "Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma" 18 : 651-658, 2011

      9 Yoshida T, "Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer" 137 : 69-73, 2002

      10 Bird N, "Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma" 105 : 1408-1416, 2018

      11 Waseem D, "Intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma : management and outcomes" 16 : 133-139, 2017

      12 Ercolani G, "Intrahepatic, peri-hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma : three different locations of the same tumor or three different tumors?" 41 : 1162-1169, 2015

      13 Bray F, "Global cancer statistics 2018 : GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36cancers in 185 countries" 68 : 394-424, 2018

      14 Esnaola NF, "Evaluation and management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma" 122 : 1349-1369, 2016

      15 Al Mahjoub A, "Epidemiology of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma in the French population" 31 : 678-684, 2019

      16 Ke Q, "Does high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the biliary duct margin affect the prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis" 17 : 211-, 2019

      17 Seyama Y, "Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer" 13 : 1505-1515, 2007

      18 Shin HR, "Comparison of incidence of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : focus on East and South-Eastern Asia" 11 : 1159-1166, 2010

      19 Razumilava N, "Classification, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma" 11 : 13-21, 2013

      20 Boris Blechacz, "Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Knowledge and New Developments" 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 11 (11): 13-26, 2017

      21 Nakeeb A, "Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors" 224 : 463-473, 1996

      22 DeOliveira ML, "Cholangiocarcinoma : thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution" 245 : 755-762, 2007

      23 Hoehn RS, "Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy is associated with improved survival for patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma" 22 (22): S1133-S1139, 2015

      24 Kim K, "Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after curative resection for extrahepatic bile duct cancer : a long-term single center experience" 35 : 136-140, 2012

      25 Jang JY, "Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection" 241 : 77-84, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-11-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한외과학회지 -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-12-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Surgical Society -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.39 0.21 0.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.56 0.328 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼