RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    주거권 보장을 위한 부동산 등기사항증명서 발급 수수료 무료화 방안 연구 - 공신력 부정 구조와 정보접근권의 관점에서

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110500058

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The real estate registration certificate in Korea is essential public notice information for tenants: it supports pre-lease risk checks, protects security deposits, helps prevent jeonse fraud, and serves as key evidence in disputes. Yet Korea denies the public reliability of registration while charging fees for viewing and issuing registration information, creating a financial barrier to the “mandatory verification” that citizens must perform to secure transactional safety. From a housing-rights perspective, this study examines the necessity and legitimacy of waiving (or quasi-waiving) issuance fees and compares alternative designs—universal fee waivers, housing-purpose conditional waivers, exemptions/vouchers for vulnerable groups, and free viewing with cost-based issuance—to propose policy and legislative options. Using 2018–2024 revenue from viewing fees, it also assesses fiscal implications and suggests replacement financing.
    번역하기

    The real estate registration certificate in Korea is essential public notice information for tenants: it supports pre-lease risk checks, protects security deposits, helps prevent jeonse fraud, and serves as key evidence in disputes. Yet Korea denies t...

    The real estate registration certificate in Korea is essential public notice information for tenants: it supports pre-lease risk checks, protects security deposits, helps prevent jeonse fraud, and serves as key evidence in disputes. Yet Korea denies the public reliability of registration while charging fees for viewing and issuing registration information, creating a financial barrier to the “mandatory verification” that citizens must perform to secure transactional safety. From a housing-rights perspective, this study examines the necessity and legitimacy of waiving (or quasi-waiving) issuance fees and compares alternative designs—universal fee waivers, housing-purpose conditional waivers, exemptions/vouchers for vulnerable groups, and free viewing with cost-based issuance—to propose policy and legislative options. Using 2018–2024 revenue from viewing fees, it also assesses fiscal implications and suggests replacement financing.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼