RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국경을 넘어, 새로운 경계를 그리며 = Crossing Borders, Drawing Boundaries Contextualizing Rubens’s Man in Korean Costume

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Peter Paul Rubens’s depiction of a man wearing Korean costume of around 1617 figurel, in the collection of the J. Paul Getty Museum, has captured viewers" attention for centuries. This large drawing was copied in Rubens’s studio during his own life time and circulated as a reproductive print in the eighteenth century. Despite its renown, there has been no consensus as to why the drawing was made or whom it may depict-and, in particular, whether he was Korean. This article examines past interpretations of the Getty’s Man in Korean Costume, including the identifications of the figure as a Siamese ambassador, a Korean Jesuit, and former Korean slaves who traveled to Italy or the Netherlands. Exploring the missionary and mercantile contests in which Europeans had contact with Koreans in the early modern period, this essay offers a new explanation of how Rubens came to draw the attire of an Asian kingdom little-known to him. As there is no documentation of a Korean living in Antwerp, the city where Rubens lived and worked, the tantalizing possibility of the artist gaining knowledge of Korean costume would have likely come in the form of material goods-exotic imports brought back from Korea via China. A nuanced interpretation of drawings and paintings Rubens made for the Jesuits around 1617-1618 demonstrates how the Man in Korean Costume relates to the Jesuits’ appropriation of exotic costume to glorify their missionary work in China and Goa and assert their victory over “idolaters.” Seen in these contexts, Rubens’s compelling portrayal of Korean costume is neither a document of a historical event nor a portrait of clothing worn by a specific sitter. Drawing in a virtuosic manner, Rubens portrayed a figure in Korean costume the way his seventeenth-century European audience most likely would have imagined him-as alluringly exotic and foreign, a wonder to behold but defying categorization.
      번역하기

      Peter Paul Rubens’s depiction of a man wearing Korean costume of around 1617 figurel, in the collection of the J. Paul Getty Museum, has captured viewers" attention for centuries. This large drawing was copied in Rubens’s studio during his own lif...

      Peter Paul Rubens’s depiction of a man wearing Korean costume of around 1617 figurel, in the collection of the J. Paul Getty Museum, has captured viewers" attention for centuries. This large drawing was copied in Rubens’s studio during his own life time and circulated as a reproductive print in the eighteenth century. Despite its renown, there has been no consensus as to why the drawing was made or whom it may depict-and, in particular, whether he was Korean. This article examines past interpretations of the Getty’s Man in Korean Costume, including the identifications of the figure as a Siamese ambassador, a Korean Jesuit, and former Korean slaves who traveled to Italy or the Netherlands. Exploring the missionary and mercantile contests in which Europeans had contact with Koreans in the early modern period, this essay offers a new explanation of how Rubens came to draw the attire of an Asian kingdom little-known to him. As there is no documentation of a Korean living in Antwerp, the city where Rubens lived and worked, the tantalizing possibility of the artist gaining knowledge of Korean costume would have likely come in the form of material goods-exotic imports brought back from Korea via China. A nuanced interpretation of drawings and paintings Rubens made for the Jesuits around 1617-1618 demonstrates how the Man in Korean Costume relates to the Jesuits’ appropriation of exotic costume to glorify their missionary work in China and Goa and assert their victory over “idolaters.” Seen in these contexts, Rubens’s compelling portrayal of Korean costume is neither a document of a historical event nor a portrait of clothing worn by a specific sitter. Drawing in a virtuosic manner, Rubens portrayed a figure in Korean costume the way his seventeenth-century European audience most likely would have imagined him-as alluringly exotic and foreign, a wonder to behold but defying categorization.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼