RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    저작물의 디지털거래와 권리소진원칙

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101888273

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    More works may be gradually circulated under digital environment in the future. When we consider this point, the existing first sale doctrine limited to the transactions of tangible things will need to be extended. This paper has examined the tendency of legislations, precedents and theories in the foreign countries such as the United States of America and Germany. In so doing, the author has tried to suggest the standard of the interpretation and desirable development direction of the first sale doctrine prescribed in the copyright act and computer program protection act. Regarding the first sale doctrine, i.e. the freedom of resale, there currently exists discrimination between consumers who bought a book or CD in bookstore or record store and consumers who bought the same thing through internet. A legal status of a consumer who bought music or movies through digital transmission has been weaker than the person who bought CD or videotapes. The person who bought lawfully music through Internet can record this to CD-R and enjoy the music. But, he may not resell the CD-R as a used music CD to third persons, even if he doesn't want to more enjoy the music. Supposing that more works become digitalized gradually and the sale will be realized not by the traditional transfer of tangible things but by method of transmission, is it desirable that such legal situation has to be continued in the future? Unfortunately, current laws of most countries and international treaties regard this discrimination as rightful. Resale and private reproduction have been recognised as a freedom of consumers of copyrighted works for a long time. Persons who bought a book or CD can reproduce this for private use and can resale this to third persons later. Nobody can criticise any copyright infringement towards such acts. This consumer's freedom has been established like a custom. This consumer's freedom should be guaranteed under digital environment. The transaction ability of copyrighted works that consumers bought once should be guaranteed whether these are in the forms of tangible things or digital forms. Simply because the existence form of works is different, its transaction ability should not be limited by eternal distribution right of the copyright owner. There has been controversies on whether the transmission of digital works should be classified into the category of reproduction right, distribution right or the right of communication to the public. By several reasons, international treaties and most national laws came to classify this act into the category of the newly introduced transmission right as a kind of the right of communication to the public. But classifying it into the transmission right as a kind of intangible rights has caused another problem about the application of first sale doctrine which is subject of this treatise. From such viewpoint that copyrighted works as intellectual creations are sold, it can not be denied that on-line transmission is similar to distribution. It is not important what way the consumer has purchased in determining as to whether the distribution right is exhausted or not.
    번역하기

    More works may be gradually circulated under digital environment in the future. When we consider this point, the existing first sale doctrine limited to the transactions of tangible things will need to be extended. This paper has examined the tendency...

    More works may be gradually circulated under digital environment in the future. When we consider this point, the existing first sale doctrine limited to the transactions of tangible things will need to be extended. This paper has examined the tendency of legislations, precedents and theories in the foreign countries such as the United States of America and Germany. In so doing, the author has tried to suggest the standard of the interpretation and desirable development direction of the first sale doctrine prescribed in the copyright act and computer program protection act. Regarding the first sale doctrine, i.e. the freedom of resale, there currently exists discrimination between consumers who bought a book or CD in bookstore or record store and consumers who bought the same thing through internet. A legal status of a consumer who bought music or movies through digital transmission has been weaker than the person who bought CD or videotapes. The person who bought lawfully music through Internet can record this to CD-R and enjoy the music. But, he may not resell the CD-R as a used music CD to third persons, even if he doesn't want to more enjoy the music. Supposing that more works become digitalized gradually and the sale will be realized not by the traditional transfer of tangible things but by method of transmission, is it desirable that such legal situation has to be continued in the future? Unfortunately, current laws of most countries and international treaties regard this discrimination as rightful. Resale and private reproduction have been recognised as a freedom of consumers of copyrighted works for a long time. Persons who bought a book or CD can reproduce this for private use and can resale this to third persons later. Nobody can criticise any copyright infringement towards such acts. This consumer's freedom has been established like a custom. This consumer's freedom should be guaranteed under digital environment. The transaction ability of copyrighted works that consumers bought once should be guaranteed whether these are in the forms of tangible things or digital forms. Simply because the existence form of works is different, its transaction ability should not be limited by eternal distribution right of the copyright owner. There has been controversies on whether the transmission of digital works should be classified into the category of reproduction right, distribution right or the right of communication to the public. By several reasons, international treaties and most national laws came to classify this act into the category of the newly introduced transmission right as a kind of the right of communication to the public. But classifying it into the transmission right as a kind of intangible rights has caused another problem about the application of first sale doctrine which is subject of this treatise. From such viewpoint that copyrighted works as intellectual creations are sold, it can not be denied that on-line transmission is similar to distribution. It is not important what way the consumer has purchased in determining as to whether the distribution right is exhausted or not.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • II. 전통적 권리소진원칙
    • 1. 이론적 근거
    • 2. 적용요건
    • 3. 지역적 적용범위
    • I. 서론
    • II. 전통적 권리소진원칙
    • 1. 이론적 근거
    • 2. 적용요건
    • 3. 지역적 적용범위
    • III. 디지털 권리소진원칙
    • 1. 문제제기
    • 2. 전송의 저작권법상 취급
    • 3. 외국에서의 논의
    • 4. 디지털 권리소진원칙의 안정에 대한 사견
    • IV. 국제적 권리소진원칙
    • 1. 속지주의원칙
    • 2. 유럽에서의 법률상황
    • 3. 국제조약의 태도
    • 4. 문헌 빛 판례의 동향
    • 5. 디지털 저작물과 국제적 권리소진원칙
    • V. 결론 및 전망
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "컴퓨터프로그램보호법 중 개정법률 해설" 45 : 2-10, 1999년

    2 "지적소유권법" 1996

    3 "정보의 디지털화에 따른 저작재산권의 대응방향" 35 : 65-74, 1996년

    4 "정보사회에서의 유럽저작권법의 변화 - 정보사회에서의 저작권 및 저작인접권의 특정분야를 통일하기 위한 지침안을 중심으로 -" 4 : 63-94, 2000

    5 "저작권법원론" 1996

    6 "저작권법상 권리소진이론" 33 : 69-106, 2003년

    7 "저작권법개설" 1997

    8 "디지털환경에서의 IPR 최초판매의 원칙" 경원대학교 2003.4

    9 "디지털 시대의 저작권법 개정 방향에 관한 소고" 41 : 14-23, 1998년

    10 "디지털 송신과 인터넷상의 저작권문제" 42 : 2-10, 1998년

    1 "컴퓨터프로그램보호법 중 개정법률 해설" 45 : 2-10, 1999년

    2 "지적소유권법" 1996

    3 "정보의 디지털화에 따른 저작재산권의 대응방향" 35 : 65-74, 1996년

    4 "정보사회에서의 유럽저작권법의 변화 - 정보사회에서의 저작권 및 저작인접권의 특정분야를 통일하기 위한 지침안을 중심으로 -" 4 : 63-94, 2000

    5 "저작권법원론" 1996

    6 "저작권법상 권리소진이론" 33 : 69-106, 2003년

    7 "저작권법개설" 1997

    8 "디지털환경에서의 IPR 최초판매의 원칙" 경원대학교 2003.4

    9 "디지털 시대의 저작권법 개정 방향에 관한 소고" 41 : 14-23, 1998년

    10 "디지털 송신과 인터넷상의 저작권문제" 42 : 2-10, 1998년

    11 "권리소진이론에 관한 연구 : 저작권을 중심으로" 63 : 88-95, 2003년

    12 "권리소진이론에 관한 연구" 2003.2

    13 "개정 저작권법 해설" 49 : 2-11, 2000년

    14 "WIPO 저작권조약 및 실연음반조약 해설(下)" 38 : 4-15, 1997년

    15 "WIPO 저작권조약 및 실연음반조약 해설(上)" 37 : 4-12, 1997년

    16 "Verlagsrecht. Kommentar" 2001

    17 "Urheberrechtliche Erschpfungslehre und digitale Informa- tionstechnologie" 198-203, 2002

    18 "Urheberrecht. Kommentar" 1998

    19 "Urheberrecht. Kommentar" 1999

    20 "Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte im Internet" 2000

    21 "Urheberrecht im Internet: Buch- und CD-Verkauf" 1997

    22 "The EC Rental Directive One Year after its Adoption" 1993

    23 "National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Study Examining 17 U.S.C. Sections 109 and 117 Pursuant to Section 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act" U.S. Department of Commerce March2001

    24 "Internetrecht" 1998

    25 "Internetrecht" 1999

    26 "Handbuch des Urheberrechts" 1996

    27 "Green Paper - Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society" 1995

    28 "Gewerblicher Rechts- schutz und Urheberrecht im Internet" 645-657, 1996

    29 "Erschpfung des Senderechts?" ZUM 1986 638-656

    30 "Erschpfung Online? - Die aktuelle Problematik beim On-Demand-Vertrieb von Tontrgern im Lichte der Richtlinie zur Informationsgesellschaft" GRUR Int 2002

    31 "EG-Richtlinie zum Urheberrecht in der Informations- gesellschaft" GRUR Int 733-745, 2001

    32 "Don’t Judge a Sale by Its License: Software Transfers Under the First Sale Doctrine in the United States and the European Community" 36 : 2001

    33 "Die Rechte der Tontrgerhersteller in internationaler und rechtsvergleichender Sicht" 1999

    34 "Die Lehre von der Erschpfung des Verbreitungsrechts im Urheberrecht" 1964

    35 "Die Erschpfungsproblematik aus der Sicht des Gemein- schaftsrechts" GRUR Int 571-584, 2000

    36 "Der urheberrechtliche Schutz von Computerpro- grammen im Recht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Republik Korea" 1999

    37 "Der Erschpfungsgrundsatz im Urheberrecht und gewerb- lichen Rechtsschutz unter Bercksichtigung der Recht- sprechung des Europischen Gerichtshofes" 221-234, 1972

    38 "Der Erschpfungsgrundsatz des Urheberrechts im Online- Bereich" 2000

    39 "Datenbankvertrge" 1995

    40 "DMCA Section 104 Report: A Report of the Register of Copyrights Pursuant to § 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act" U.S. Copyright Office 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-08-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업재산권법학회 -> 한국지식재산학회
    영문명 : Korea Industrial Property Law Association -> Korea Intellectual Property Society
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-03-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업재산권법학회a -> 한국산업재산권법학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-07-31 학술지등록 한글명 : 산업재산권
    외국어명 : Journal of Industrial Property
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.81 0.81 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.69 0.759 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼