RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Sharing Economy and Freedom of Occupation in Korean Constitution

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106349458

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As human beings get usually the means of living through their own physical and/or intellectual activities, it is normal that they have to be able to decide and exercise their own activities, so-called, freedom of occupation. It includes freedom of choice, freedom of exercising an occupation, freedom of business and enterprise, freedom of competitionIt, etc. And, it is not compatible, in principle, with planned economy order.








      Today, the development of science and technology requires the sharing of all information and goods. The introduction of a new system represents a challenge to the existing order, and resistance arises.








      Recently, in Korea, there has been a serious social conflicts between licensed taxi drivers and individual drivers sharing their cars through SNS. Sharing one’s car for a fee, as a type of sharing economy, it means an appearance of new type’s public transport like Uber taxi and one of a new job. It asks to share the taxi market between traditional taxi drivers and individual drivers offering their car to the public for a fee.
      Even though it is also a kind of constitutional requests to harmonize the two kinds of job, sharing means of transport can be advantageous for users through competition between them. And, it is doubtful whether we will be able to deny this time change.








      As KCC has already confirmed, it is impossible to reform the society, including the profession or the system, according to the needs of the public welfare if the legislator has to adhere to the existing order that has already been formed. Based on a certain degree of confidence protection, new changes must be actively accepted in legislation and in constitutional review, especially, in the field of freedom of occupation.
      번역하기

      As human beings get usually the means of living through their own physical and/or intellectual activities, it is normal that they have to be able to decide and exercise their own activities, so-called, freedom of occupation. It includes freedom of cho...

      As human beings get usually the means of living through their own physical and/or intellectual activities, it is normal that they have to be able to decide and exercise their own activities, so-called, freedom of occupation. It includes freedom of choice, freedom of exercising an occupation, freedom of business and enterprise, freedom of competitionIt, etc. And, it is not compatible, in principle, with planned economy order.








      Today, the development of science and technology requires the sharing of all information and goods. The introduction of a new system represents a challenge to the existing order, and resistance arises.








      Recently, in Korea, there has been a serious social conflicts between licensed taxi drivers and individual drivers sharing their cars through SNS. Sharing one’s car for a fee, as a type of sharing economy, it means an appearance of new type’s public transport like Uber taxi and one of a new job. It asks to share the taxi market between traditional taxi drivers and individual drivers offering their car to the public for a fee.
      Even though it is also a kind of constitutional requests to harmonize the two kinds of job, sharing means of transport can be advantageous for users through competition between them. And, it is doubtful whether we will be able to deny this time change.








      As KCC has already confirmed, it is impossible to reform the society, including the profession or the system, according to the needs of the public welfare if the legislator has to adhere to the existing order that has already been formed. Based on a certain degree of confidence protection, new changes must be actively accepted in legislation and in constitutional review, especially, in the field of freedom of occupation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이세주, "헌법재판소 결정에 나타난 기업의 자유에 대한 이해" 한국헌법학회 20 (20): 73-118, 2014

      2 이철호, "헌법상 직업선택의 자유와 공직자 취업 제한 문제" 한국헌법학회 8 (8): 179-209, 2002

      3 변해철, "한국 헌법에서의 경제" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 441-456, 2009

      4 송기춘, "공직자윤리법상 퇴직 후 취업제한에 관한 법적 논의 -공직자윤리법 제17조 등의 개정안에 대한 검토를 중심으로-" 한국헌법학회 17 (17): 209-240, 2011

      5 "www.moleg.go.kr"

      6 "www.klri.re.kr"

      7 "www.ccourt.go.kr"

      8 Lee, Seung Woo, "Freedom of choice of occupation and license system" Sekwang Publishing 2002

      9 Lee, Duk Yeon, "Freedom of Business and Constitutional Economic Order in Korea" 29 (29): 2000

      10 Sung, Nak-In, "Constitutional Law" 2019

      1 이세주, "헌법재판소 결정에 나타난 기업의 자유에 대한 이해" 한국헌법학회 20 (20): 73-118, 2014

      2 이철호, "헌법상 직업선택의 자유와 공직자 취업 제한 문제" 한국헌법학회 8 (8): 179-209, 2002

      3 변해철, "한국 헌법에서의 경제" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 441-456, 2009

      4 송기춘, "공직자윤리법상 퇴직 후 취업제한에 관한 법적 논의 -공직자윤리법 제17조 등의 개정안에 대한 검토를 중심으로-" 한국헌법학회 17 (17): 209-240, 2011

      5 "www.moleg.go.kr"

      6 "www.klri.re.kr"

      7 "www.ccourt.go.kr"

      8 Lee, Seung Woo, "Freedom of choice of occupation and license system" Sekwang Publishing 2002

      9 Lee, Duk Yeon, "Freedom of Business and Constitutional Economic Order in Korea" 29 (29): 2000

      10 Sung, Nak-In, "Constitutional Law" 2019

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.57 0.57 0.693 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼