RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    충북 중원군 엄정면의 땅이름 연구  :  통일의 대상이 되었던 땅이름을 중심으로 = A Study of the Place Names of Eomjeong Borough in Joongwon Counry, Choonfchong Bukdo Province

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3149760

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The government, in a Central Committee on place names session on March 14, unified and promulgated each of the first 8 of the 46 place names of Eomjeong Borough in Joongwon County, Choongchong Bukdo Province, which have so far been called differently among its inhabitants. It was known that the government also plans to do likewise within this year by selecting five model boroughs in five provinces. The place names thus fixed are reportedly to be used compulsorily in cartography, conduct of administrative affairs, and school textbooks.
    Viewed in this context, the question of how to unify the diversely called regional names bears great significance. It appears that place names are made easily. Yet in these names dwell the soul and spirit of their users, and with time they become part of the local history and cannot be changed or disappear readily. Accordingly, if these place names handed down by word of mouth through thousnads of years are tampered with for the sake of mere administrative expediency in the course of their unification, it might result in burying alive all the living materials and soul of our history and culture.
    Deeply mindful of this, the writer, to be of some help in the approach to and process of unifying place names henceforth, shows what are the problems involved and in which direction to go in doing so, by examining the place names decided upon and promulgated and the ones soon to be unified.
    These problems have surfaced in the process of unifying district names :
    1.Low are the levels of knowledge and perceptive powers of the administrators involved in the task and the respondents to the questionnaires.
    2.Poor is the perception, that is, the perception of the significance of the Korean language, written and spoken, by the people involved in the task.
    3.No research is done at all into place names.
    4.Decisions are made on what is right or wrong, upon the basis of questionnaire results.
    5.In the course of the task, orthographical errors are occasionally made and place names are in danger of becoming quite different names from their original as a result, especially, of incorrectly transcribing them into Chinese characters.
    6.In some cases, no distinction is made between the upper and lower categories of place names.
    7.A place name is sometimes called in two different ways due to the discrepancy between spoken and written speech : spoken speech in the native Korean tongue and written speech in the Korean characters originating from Chinese characters (but, in this case also, mainly in Chinese characters).
    The following suggestions are offered :
    1.Place names be unified, based on native ones.
    2.Place names be written in the Korean alphabet.
    3.Place names be written in conformity with the Korean orthography.
    4.Place names coming direct from Chinese characters be changed into native ones.
    5.Place names written incorrectly on maps and their orthographical errors be corrected.
    6.Names not only of smaller districts but also larger administrative units (small village, large village, borough, township, county, city, province) be changed into native ones if possible and, if not, at least be written in the Korean alphabet.
    7.The urgency be felt to get the names of smaller places on the maps.
    We have our own writing system which fits our language system. But we have not utilized it to the fullest extent in many areas. The most conspicuous of all is the area of human names and place names. Even today, newspapers express all other things in Korean but use Chinese characters for both human and place names. There is no special reason for this.
    Now, though belatedly, we ought to win back what is our own, beginning with our human and regional names. For example, a place name like '가래올' should not be written deliberately in the Chinese characters '楸洞' but stand as 가래올, unifying both its spoken and written form. In this way we should utilize our national language, spoken and written, in a convenient manner. I believe that this is the way we nurture our culture and our national spirit.
    번역하기

    The government, in a Central Committee on place names session on March 14, unified and promulgated each of the first 8 of the 46 place names of Eomjeong Borough in Joongwon County, Choongchong Bukdo Province, which have so far been called differently ...

    The government, in a Central Committee on place names session on March 14, unified and promulgated each of the first 8 of the 46 place names of Eomjeong Borough in Joongwon County, Choongchong Bukdo Province, which have so far been called differently among its inhabitants. It was known that the government also plans to do likewise within this year by selecting five model boroughs in five provinces. The place names thus fixed are reportedly to be used compulsorily in cartography, conduct of administrative affairs, and school textbooks.
    Viewed in this context, the question of how to unify the diversely called regional names bears great significance. It appears that place names are made easily. Yet in these names dwell the soul and spirit of their users, and with time they become part of the local history and cannot be changed or disappear readily. Accordingly, if these place names handed down by word of mouth through thousnads of years are tampered with for the sake of mere administrative expediency in the course of their unification, it might result in burying alive all the living materials and soul of our history and culture.
    Deeply mindful of this, the writer, to be of some help in the approach to and process of unifying place names henceforth, shows what are the problems involved and in which direction to go in doing so, by examining the place names decided upon and promulgated and the ones soon to be unified.
    These problems have surfaced in the process of unifying district names :
    1.Low are the levels of knowledge and perceptive powers of the administrators involved in the task and the respondents to the questionnaires.
    2.Poor is the perception, that is, the perception of the significance of the Korean language, written and spoken, by the people involved in the task.
    3.No research is done at all into place names.
    4.Decisions are made on what is right or wrong, upon the basis of questionnaire results.
    5.In the course of the task, orthographical errors are occasionally made and place names are in danger of becoming quite different names from their original as a result, especially, of incorrectly transcribing them into Chinese characters.
    6.In some cases, no distinction is made between the upper and lower categories of place names.
    7.A place name is sometimes called in two different ways due to the discrepancy between spoken and written speech : spoken speech in the native Korean tongue and written speech in the Korean characters originating from Chinese characters (but, in this case also, mainly in Chinese characters).
    The following suggestions are offered :
    1.Place names be unified, based on native ones.
    2.Place names be written in the Korean alphabet.
    3.Place names be written in conformity with the Korean orthography.
    4.Place names coming direct from Chinese characters be changed into native ones.
    5.Place names written incorrectly on maps and their orthographical errors be corrected.
    6.Names not only of smaller districts but also larger administrative units (small village, large village, borough, township, county, city, province) be changed into native ones if possible and, if not, at least be written in the Korean alphabet.
    7.The urgency be felt to get the names of smaller places on the maps.
    We have our own writing system which fits our language system. But we have not utilized it to the fullest extent in many areas. The most conspicuous of all is the area of human names and place names. Even today, newspapers express all other things in Korean but use Chinese characters for both human and place names. There is no special reason for this.
    Now, though belatedly, we ought to win back what is our own, beginning with our human and regional names. For example, a place name like '가래올' should not be written deliberately in the Chinese characters '楸洞' but stand as 가래올, unifying both its spoken and written form. In this way we should utilize our national language, spoken and written, in a convenient manner. I believe that this is the way we nurture our culture and our national spirit.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.머리말
    • Ⅱ.중원군 및 엄정면의 연혁
    • Ⅲ.통일의 대상이 되었던 땅이름
    • Ⅳ.땅이름 통일의 과정에서 드러난 문제점
    • Ⅴ.제안
    • Ⅰ.머리말
    • Ⅱ.중원군 및 엄정면의 연혁
    • Ⅲ.통일의 대상이 되었던 땅이름
    • Ⅳ.땅이름 통일의 과정에서 드러난 문제점
    • Ⅴ.제안
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼