RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Analysis of Distortion Mechanism of a Cold Work Tool Steel During Quenching and Deep Cryogenic Treatment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106174642

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The microstructure distribution and distortion behavior of a cold work tool steel cylindrical specimen with keyway afterquenching (QT) and deep cryogenic treatment (DCT) were evaluated in detail. Furthermore, from the viewpoints of thermaland volumetric strains, an attempt was made to reveal its distortion mechanism during QT and DCT. The results suggestthat DCT can effectively improve the dimensional stability of specimen and eliminate the distortion caused by QT. Duringthe QT and DCT processes, the bending direction and the curvature change of specimen are closely associated withthe competition between the thermal strain induced by thermal contraction and the volumetric strain caused by martensitetransformation. After DCT, the average thermal and volumetric strains of specimen are respectively about − 0.0051 mm/mm and 0.0049 mm/mm, which are decreased by about 100% and increased by around 25% compared with that of QT,respectively. During QT, the distortion behavior of specimen is governed primarily by the volumetric strain and it mainlyundergoes an expansion deformation. While, during DCT, the distortion behavior of specimen is dominated by the thermalstrain and it primarily encounters a contraction deformation. However, compared with the expansion deformation during QT,the contraction deformation of specimen during DCT is much more significant, which further proves that DCT is feasibleto improve the dimensional stability of specimen.
      번역하기

      The microstructure distribution and distortion behavior of a cold work tool steel cylindrical specimen with keyway afterquenching (QT) and deep cryogenic treatment (DCT) were evaluated in detail. Furthermore, from the viewpoints of thermaland volumetr...

      The microstructure distribution and distortion behavior of a cold work tool steel cylindrical specimen with keyway afterquenching (QT) and deep cryogenic treatment (DCT) were evaluated in detail. Furthermore, from the viewpoints of thermaland volumetric strains, an attempt was made to reveal its distortion mechanism during QT and DCT. The results suggestthat DCT can effectively improve the dimensional stability of specimen and eliminate the distortion caused by QT. Duringthe QT and DCT processes, the bending direction and the curvature change of specimen are closely associated withthe competition between the thermal strain induced by thermal contraction and the volumetric strain caused by martensitetransformation. After DCT, the average thermal and volumetric strains of specimen are respectively about − 0.0051 mm/mm and 0.0049 mm/mm, which are decreased by about 100% and increased by around 25% compared with that of QT,respectively. During QT, the distortion behavior of specimen is governed primarily by the volumetric strain and it mainlyundergoes an expansion deformation. While, during DCT, the distortion behavior of specimen is dominated by the thermalstrain and it primarily encounters a contraction deformation. However, compared with the expansion deformation during QT,the contraction deformation of specimen during DCT is much more significant, which further proves that DCT is feasibleto improve the dimensional stability of specimen.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 J.R. Cho, 153–154 : 476-481, 2004

      2 D. J. Kamody, 154 : 215-218, 1998

      3 A. Sugianto, 19 : 194-206, 2010

      4 M. Preciado, 176 : 41-44, 2006

      5 F. J. Da Silva, 261 : 674-685, 2006

      6 V. Leskovsek, 29 : 72-76, 2002

      7 H. Li, 662 : 356-362, 2016

      8 C. H. Surberg, 48 : 42-47, 2008

      9 M. Villa, 65 : 383-392, 2014

      10 M. Araghchi, 689 : 48-52, 2017

      1 J.R. Cho, 153–154 : 476-481, 2004

      2 D. J. Kamody, 154 : 215-218, 1998

      3 A. Sugianto, 19 : 194-206, 2010

      4 M. Preciado, 176 : 41-44, 2006

      5 F. J. Da Silva, 261 : 674-685, 2006

      6 V. Leskovsek, 29 : 72-76, 2002

      7 H. Li, 662 : 356-362, 2016

      8 C. H. Surberg, 48 : 42-47, 2008

      9 M. Villa, 65 : 383-392, 2014

      10 M. Araghchi, 689 : 48-52, 2017

      11 T. Sonar, 20 : 113-118, 2018

      12 M. Jung, 60 : 525-536, 2012

      13 D.K. Ju, 438–440 : 246-250, 2006

      14 A. Sugianto, 209 : 3597-3609, 2009

      15 H. H. Bok, 58 : 154-183, 2014

      16 D. N. Collins, 23 : 40-42, 1996

      17 D. Das, 22 : 474-480, 2007

      18 S. Zhirafar, 186 : 298-303, 2007

      19 V. G. Gavriljuk, 61 : 1705-1715, 2013

      20 S. H. Li, 732 : 167-177, 2018

      21 L. C. F. Canale, 24 : 4-52, 2005

      22 K. Arimoto, 4 : 168-186, 2009

      23 J. W. Li, 47 : 653-666, 2013

      24 J. W. Li, 23 : 4237-4250, 2014

      25 C. Şimşir, 44 : 588-600, 2008

      26 S. J. Lee, 56 : 1482-1490, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한금속ㆍ재료학회 -> 대한금속·재료학회 KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.05 0.91 1.31
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.03 0.86 0.678 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼